- About Archives
- About SAA
- Careers
- Education
- Publications
- Advocacy
- Membership
Question responses were provided via the Repository Profile Form by Katie Bednark, Consulting School Archivist at Nightingale-Bamford School, New York, NY on April 22, 2022.
Tool and version, if applicable
Preservica 6.4.1
Type of archives or special collection library?
K-12 independent school
How did your institution select this archival collection management tool?
When and why did you adopt this tool? What system did it replace (if any)?
In spring 2021, I was informed that I had to move my digital collection from Veridian by fall 2021, due to Veridian no longer supporting secure collections. I had just set up Veridian in late 2018 and had 2 TB of content. We signed the Preservica contract in October 2021.
I am still populating Preservica with the digital content that was on Veridian. It is currently used for preservation and (soon) internal access (our collection is not open to the public). As I become more adept at using Preservica and get more content loaded, this could expand, as I still need to integrate it with my ArchivesSpace catalog.
The org that hosted our Veridian platform provided a hard drive of our content including metadata files, plus a hard drive to keep as back up. I did some metadata cleanup and date reformatting to comply with Preservica's date format. Preservica offers six virtual training sessions (also available in recorded format) that I attended. My metadata was given to me in .CSV spreadsheets, which had to be run through a converter site that Preservica provided to create .metadata files for upload. Preservica also provided two Python codes for uploading content and metadata files - this is specific to our collection, which contains a TIF, PDF, and JP2 file for almost every asset and is not typically required where an asset consists of just one format and a metadata file. I do wish I'd better understood the internal workings of Preservica (difficulty of using a custom metadata schema versus Dublin Core or MODS) before starting. We use a custom schema and it required creating custom XML documents that had to be uploaded to Preservica. I wish I'd been able to speak to someone who had established Preservica in their (smallish) institution before starting.
Preservica's Solutions Architect that wrote the Python codes for uploading content had to answer quite a few questions from me as we went along. This was partly due to them imparting knowledge to me as we went along rather than letting me know what I'd need upfront. My internal IT wasn't able to assist due to the massive time commitment for uploading the files. Preservica also has a customer support system where users submit tickets online and a support person answers via email. It felt like I was flying solo a lot.
Storage is via cloud/Preservica, but all of the work must be done in-house, such as file uploads, metadata input, access site creation via Wordpress, and setting up the basic structure of your Preservica platform. With Veridian, we had an off-site host that did most of that.
Please describe significant post-implementation challenges using the administrative and/or public interfaces.
Six months after contract, my access site is still in development. I've had many challenges learning how to set up my Preservica platform and upload the large amount of content using their Python code. There's been a lot of one step forward, one (or two) steps backward, running into problems, consulting documentation and support, resolving the problem, running into a new problem. Also, I wish the files on the hard drive provided by Veridian had been organized differently in hindsight to make uploading faster and more orderly.
I intend to integrate Preservica with our ArchivesSpace catalog, but I don't know when this will happen due to the challenges and slow pace of initially uploading our digital assets to Preservica.
At the moment, it is not an improvement due to the challenges and slow pace of getting my data uploaded and useable. Eventually, I believe the preservation features will be an improvement and the integration with ArchivesSpace will hopefully reduce repetitive work and increase consistency.
There is some flexibility in the appearance of the Wordpress site used for access. The facets and filters are helpful.
Getting it established, set up, and initially loaded with our existing digital content. It does not apply OCR or the ability to transcribe records (I had to create a metadata field for my existing transcriptions).
Lessons Learned, or tip for prospective users?
I wish I'd been able to speak with someone who had set up Preservica at their institution. Set up will be much slower than you anticipate. Don't expect too much hand holding from Preservica. Learn about transforms, indexing, and Preservica's terminology before implementation. Organize your files for optimum ease in uploading, particularly if you have more than one format type per asset. Know what file formats are required for uploading and convert ahead of time if necessary.
More personalized assistance in getting set up and running, similar to the existing virtual training classes but on a personalized level. The training should be more in-depth. Documentation could be clearer at times. They could provide more advice on how to prepare for migration. I'd also like to see OCR included and a transcription field.