SAA's Governance Manual describes the organization's structure, officers, component groups, awards program, and student chapters, and includes the Constitution and Bylaws. See Appendix A for specific policies such as guidelines for SAA Websites, use of the SAA logo, choosing Annual Meeting sites, fundraising policy, etc.
The name of this organization shall be the Society of American Archivists. The Society is incorporated as a nonprofit organization under the laws of the District of Columbia.
The Society of American Archivists is a professional organization established to provide a means for effective cooperation among persons concerned with the documentation of human experience; to stimulate and to publish the results of research in archival administration and records management; to promote the adoption of sound principles and standards by all public and private agencies responsible for the preservation and administration of records; to foster a better public understanding of the nature and value of archival operations and holdings; to develop professional standards, particularly for the training of archivists, records managers, and custodians of private papers, and to improve the facilities and increase the opportunities for such training; to maintain and strengthen relations with historians, librarians, educators, public administrators, and others in allied disciplines; and to cooperate with other professional organizations, cultural and educational institutions, and international organizations having mutual interests in the preservation and use of recorded heritage.
A. There shall be several categories of membership.
1. Individual full membership shall be open to those who are or have been engaged in the custody, study, teaching, or control of records, archives, or private papers, or who wish to support the objectives of the Society. Full members are eligible to hold office in the Society; to hold any appointed position in the Society; to vote for officers, Councilors, and members of the Nominating Committee; to vote on all matters requiring a vote which come before the Society as a whole; to be members of constituent units of the Society; and to receive the benefits of the Society's programs and services.
2. Individual associate membership shall be limited to those who wish to support the objectives of the Society but who are either not professionally responsible for custody or control of records, archives, or private papers or who are not engaged in the study or teaching of archives. Associate members are eligible to be members of sections and task forces and to receive the benefits of the Society's programs and services.
3. Individual student membership shall be open to students in degree-conferring programs. Student members may vote for officers, Councilors, members of the Nominating Committee, and on all matters requiring a vote which come before the Society as a whole. Student members are eligible to hold any appointed position in the Society; to be members of constituent units of the Society; and to receive the benefits of the Society's programs and services.
4. Institutional membership shall be open to institutions or agencies responsible for or substantially interested in the custody, study, teaching, control, or use of records, archives, and/or private papers. Institutional members are eligible to receive the publications of the Society. Each institutional member may identify a primary contact person, who is eligible to vote, hold office, and serve on appointed groups.
5. Honorary membership, in recognition of eminent distinction in any of the fields of the Society's objectives, may be extended to any person chosen by a two-thirds vote of the full membership of the Council following nomination by at least ten (10) individual members. Honorary membership shall be for life, and honorary members shall not be required to pay dues or other assessments. They shall have all the privileges of individual full members. The number of honorary members shall not exceed ten (10) at any one time.
B. Dues
Changes in membership dues shall be determined by the Council.
C. Termination of Membership
The membership of any member may be terminated for good cause which may include, among other reasons, any one (1) or more of the following reasons:
1. Voluntary Termination:
Arrearage in dues, fees, assessments or other financial obligations to SAA for a period of thirty to sixty days after notice thereof has been sent to the member in arrears. Membership is subject to suspension or termination at the discretion of SAA under this provision.
2. Involuntary Termination:
A final decision by the Council that a member has violated the SAA Code of Ethics; the Code of Conduct; the Equal Opportunity/Non-discrimination Policy; and the SAA Statement on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
a. Any member whose membership has been involuntarily terminated shall be prohibited, from the date of termination, from: attending, presenting, or exhibiting at the SAA Annual Meeting; attending or teaching an SAA education course; authoring for SAA publications; receiving an SAA award or recognition; or participating on Section discussion lists or events.
b. Readmission. Any member whose membership was terminated involuntarily shall be eligible for readmission for membership in SAA by submitting a request to the SAA Council, provided that the basis for the original termination no longer exists.
To recognize sustained and outstanding achievements in pursuit of the goals of the profession and the work of the Society, there shall be a special class of individual members, known as Fellows of the Society of American Archivists, which shall consist of members elected to that class by a seventy-five (75) percent vote of the Committee on the Selection of Fellows. To be elected a Fellow, one must have been a member of the Society in good standing for at least seven (7) years, consecutively or non-consecutively.
A. Officers and the Council
1. Officers.
The officers of the Society shall be a President, a Vice President, a Treasurer, and an Executive Committee member. The President and Vice President shall serve terms of one (1) year each and shall take office at the conclusion of the annual business meeting following the election and shall be ineligible for immediate reelection. The Vice President shall automatically become President at the conclusion of the following year's annual business meeting or in case of a vacancy in the presidency. The Treasurer shall be elected for a term of three (3) years beginning at the conclusion of the annual business meeting following the election and shall be ineligible for immediate reelection.
a. The President shall direct and coordinate the affairs of the Society, preside at all business meetings of the Society, the Council, and its Executive Committee, and shall perform such duties as may be directed by the Council. The President may vote in any meeting of the Society at which they preside.
b. The Vice President shall perform the duties of the President in case the President is absent or incapacitated and, in case of a vacancy in the presidency, shall assume that office and hold it for the remainder of the term. In case of a vacancy in the vice presidency, the Council shall determine how to fill the vacancy.
c. The Treasurer shall be responsible for planning and formulating financial policy in consultation with the Finance Committee and the Executive Director; recommending such policies to the Council; reviewing the annual budget before its submission to the Finance Committee and to the Council; internal auditing of all Society financial operations; providing an annual report on the Society's finances; and investing special funds and endowments on the advice and consent of the Finance Committee and the Council. In the absence of the President and the Vice President, the Treasurer shall preside at business meeting(s) of the Society and meetings of the Council.
d. One councilor shall be elected from among the councilors in their second year of service for a term of one (1) year to serve on the Executive Committee.
2. Council
a. The government of the Society, the management of its affairs, and the regulation of its procedures, except as otherwise provided in this constitution and bylaws, shall be vested in a council. The Council shall consist of the President, Vice President, Treasurer, and nine (9) Councilors elected at-large by the Society. The Immediate Past President also serves as a non-voting, ex officio member of the Council. Three (3) of the nine (9) Councilors shall be elected in each annual election for terms of three (3) years. The nine (9) Councilors shall be ineligible for immediate reelection. If a vacancy shall occur among the Councilors or in any of the offices except the presidency, it may be filled by the Council according to the constitution and bylaws of the Society. The person designated shall hold the position through the end of the original term.
b. The Council shall meet at the Annual Meeting of the Society and shall hold such other meetings as it may determine. Special meetings of the Council for any purpose shall be called by the Executive Director on written request of the President or of three (3) members of the Council. Seven (7) members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. When meeting, a vote shall become the act of the Council on approval by a majority of those present and voting.
c. Executive Committee: The Executive Committee of the Council shall be composed of the President, the Vice President, the Treasurer, and one councilor who shall be elected from among the councilors in their second year of service for a term of one (1) year by the nine (9) councilors at the spring meeting of the Council. The President shall serve as chair of the Executive Committee and shall call the committee into session. The Executive Committee shall act for the Council in conducting the affairs of the Society between meetings of the Council and shall provide timely communication and consultation with the Council between meetings. The Executive Committee shall annually conduct a performance review of the Executive Director according to procedures mutually agreed to by the Executive Committee and the Executive Director and approved by the Council.
B. Duties of the Executive Director
1. The Executive Director shall manage the programs and activities of the Society and its staff. The Executive Director shall assist the President in establishing the agenda for the Council's meetings.
2. The Executive Director shall keep the minutes of the annual business meeting, Council meetings, and Executive Committee meetings; prepare and send notices; present at each annual business meeting a report of the activities of the Society; and perform such other duties as may be directed by the Council. The Executive Director shall have custody of and preserve the corporate seal of the Society and shall affix the seal under the direction of the President and the Council. The Executive Director shall, in consultation with the Treasurer, prepare the Society's annual budget for submission to the Executive Committee and the Council. The Executive Director shall receive and disburse all funds in the general operating budget of the Society and the funds in the various Society budgets supported by external grants, special projects, and endowments under guidelines established by the Council. Quarterly reports of all receipts and disbursements for all budgets shall be made to the Council by the Executive Director. According to guidelines established by the Council, the Executive Director shall hire, compensate, supervise, evaluate, and terminate all other persons employed by the Society.
C. Finances.
1. The Society's financial assets and activities shall be divided into funds reflecting general operations, special projects, endowments, and such other functional categories as the Council may establish from time to time. To further the aims and purposes of the profession, the Council may establish special projects funds set apart from the general operating and endowment funds and used only for the purposes for which they are or were established. The Council may establish permanent endowment funds from which only the earnings may be expended to further the aims of the Society.
2. The Council shall hold fiduciary responsibility for policy governing investment of funds and for care of other assets of the Society. Fiscal control of the funds and assets shall be maintained by such records and accounting system as may be prescribed by the Council in accordance with the constitution and bylaws, and existing guidelines. An annual audit of the financial affairs shall be made and a report of the audit published.
D. Election of Officers and Councilors
1. There shall be a Nominating Committee composed of five (5) members, two (2) of whom are selected at the spring meeting of the Council from among the councilors in their second year of service and three (3) of whom have been elected by the membership. The person receiving the most votes in the election by the membership shall serve as chair. In the event of a tie vote, the chair shall be appointed by the Vice President / President-Elect from among the three (3) elected members of the Committee.
2. The Nominating Committee shall canvass the membership for suggestions of possible nominees for the offices of Vice President, Treasurer, councilors, and Nominating Committee. The tabulated results of this advisory canvass shall be made available to any member of the Society upon request. The Nominating Committee shall try to achieve a broadly based, diverse election slate.
3. The Nominating Committee shall put forth a minimum of two (2) nominees from the eligible membership for each vacancy. The Nominating Committee shall notify the membership of the names of the nominees via the SAA website and through the January/February issue of the Society's newsletter. An eligible member may also be placed on the ballot by submission of a petition signed by five (5) percent of eligible voting members of the society. Such petitions must be submitted to the Executive Director at least 60 days prior to the election ballot opening.
4. The Nominating Committee shall issue an official ballot containing names of the candidates whom it has named, the candidates who have been nominated by petition, and blank space for write-in candidates. The ballot shall be accompanied by brief biographical sketches of the nominees, a diversity statement per the guidelines approved by the Council, and responses to questions posed by the nominating committee. Candidates may add a brief statement of the issues facing the Society and how they intend to deal with those issues.
5. Ballots shall be distributed to all eligible voting members according to a method and schedule approved by the Council. If no candidate for a vacancy receives a plurality of at least forty (40) percent of the membership voting, the Nominating Committee will conduct a run-off election under terms determined by the Council. In the event of a tie vote for the office of Vice President, both candidates will be deemed to have been elected and will serve successive terms. The Council will determine by lot which candidate will serve as Vice President in the first and as President in the second year. The other candidate will serve as Vice President in the second year and as President in the third year. In the event of a tie vote that affects the outcome of the election for any other office, the Council will determine by lot which candidate will serve.
6. All votes shall be tallied by at least three (3) individual members of the Society. The ballots and the tabulated results shall then be given to the Executive Director who shall immediately notify all candidates of election results. The names of the new officers, councilors, and members of the Nominating Committee shall be published online and in the next issue of the Society's newsletter and announced publicly at the annual business meeting. A member may obtain the vote count from the executive office of the Society.
7. In filling a vacancy for any councilor or officer other than the president under the terms of Article V., Section A.2.a., of the constitution and bylaws, the Council shall balance the will of the voting membership expressed in the most recent election cycle, the need for familiarity with issues being addressed by the Council, and the amount of time remaining in the term of the vacancy to be filled.
E. Appointments
The Council shall appoint a Executive Director who shall serve at its pleasure. Except when the Council or its Executive Committee is in executive session, the Executive Director shall attend the meetings of the Council, the Executive Committee, and the annual business meeting and keep their minutes, but shall not vote.
1. Except as otherwise specified in the constitution and bylaws, committees, boards, task forces, working groups, sections, and other units shall be created and terminated by the President with the advice and approval of the Council. Chairs of committees, boards, task forces, and working groups shall be appointed by the Vice President / President-Elect for terms of one year and may be appointed to a maximum of three consecutive terms except for such bodies for which the term and means of selection of chair are otherwise specified in the constitution and bylaws of the Society. Each committee, board, task force, working group, or other unit shall have guidelines approved and amended as necessary by the Council that set forth its purpose, size, composition, means of selection and length of terms of members and chair, reporting procedures, and duties and responsibilities. Each section shall select its own leaders and shall adopt standing rules defining its own governance provided that no section standing rules may be in conflict with the constitution and bylaws, or Governance Manual of the Society.
2. Student chapters may be initiated in academic institutions and approved by the Council. Each student chapter shall select its own leaders and adopt bylaws defining its own governance, provided that no student chapter bylaw may be in conflict with the constitution and bylaws or the Governance Manual of the Society.
In the event of grievances as specified below, there shall be a Grievance Committee. The Committee shall be composed of five members, each of whom must have served the Society as a councilor or as an elected officer within the past five years, but who may not be serving in such capacity at the time of the work of the Committee. Two members of the Committee shall be chosen by the Council, two members by the individual(s) filing/involved in the grievance, and the fifth member by decision of the first four members chosen. The fifth member will serve as chair of the Committee. The Committee shall hear grievances 1) between members of the Society and the Council, 2) between the Executive Director and the Council, 3) between the Executive Director and a staff member, and 4) such other grievances as may be referred to it by the Council. The decision of the Grievance Committee concerning matters involving the Executive Director shall be binding upon the parties to the dispute, provided that the decision is in accordance with applicable federal and state laws and the constitution and bylaws of the Society
The Council is authorized and directed to prepare, adopt, or amend such administrative guidelines, policies, and procedures as may be desirable to regularize the functions and operations of the Society's committees, task forces, boards, sections, representatives, awards, programs, and other activities. Adoption or amendment to the Governance Manual requires approval by a majority of the Council. No part of the Governance Manual may conflict with the Society's constitution and bylaws. The Governance Manual shall be maintained by the Executive Director and made available on the Society’s website.
I. Parliamentary Procedure
Robert's Rules of Order (latest revised edition) shall govern the proceedings of the Society, except as otherwise provided for in the constitution and bylaws and special rules of the Society.
J. Member Referenda
1. Resolution of motions filed with the Executive Director in accordance with Article IX of the Constitution and Bylaws shall be determined by member referendum.
2. The Council Executive Committee shall review and approve a briefing paper prior to the constitutionally specified distribution date for presentation of the constitution and bylaws amendments.
3. Copies of proposed constitution and bylaws amendments and briefing papers, prepared by the proposer(s) and/or by the Executive Director in accordance with Council guidelines, shall be distributed in accordance with Article IX of the Constitution and Bylaws and shall be presented 60 days prior to the referendum ballot opening. Presentation shall include information regarding the timing of the referendum on the proposed amendment, as specified in (6) and (7) of this bylaw.
4. All members shall be given the opportunity to participate in discussion and debate on items presented for referendum.
5. Notice of the referendum, along with copies of the documents specified in 3., shall be distributed by the Executive Director to eligible voting members.
6. For amendments proposed under Articles IX. and X. of the constitution that are determined by the Council to be time sensitive, the notice of the referendum specified in (5) shall occur no more than thirty (30) days after the motion is presented. Ballots shall be distributed to eligible voting members according to a method approved by the Council no fewer than sixty (60) days and no more than ninety (90) days after the motion is first presented.
7. For amendments proposed under Article IX. of the constitution and bylaws that are determined by the Council not to be time sensitive, the notice of the referendum specified in (5) shall occur no fewer than sixty (60) days prior to the availability of ballots for the annual election of officers, councilors, and elected members of the Nominating Committee. The referendum on such amendments shall be included as part of this annual ballot.1.
8. Approval of motions shall be determined by a majority vote for proposed amendments to the Constitution and Bylaws of those members voting in the referendum, provided that at least ten (10) percent of the eligible voting members shall have voted. A member may obtain the vote count from the Executive Director.
1. The Society shall hold an annual business meeting at such time and place as the Council shall determine, and special meetings may be called by a two-thirds (2/3rds) vote of the Council. Notice of each meeting of the Society shall be given by the Executive Director at least thirty (30) days before the date of the meeting.
At the beginning of the Society's annual business meeting, the President shall present the following rules for adoption by a majority vote of those members present and voting. Once adopted, the rules may be suspended or amended only by two-thirds (2/3rds) of members present and voting unless such suspension or amendment conflicts with the Society's constitution and bylaws. Notice of the rules of the business meeting shall be made in writing to all meeting attendees.
a. Full members, student members, and honorary members may vote at the Society's business meetings. Each institutional member may identify a primary contact person who is eligible to vote.
b. In any question of the membership status of an individual, the executive office roster of members for the month in which the annual meeting begins will be definitive.
c. All members may participate in discussions at the business meeting.
d. Persons seeking recognition from the chair shall identify themselves for the record, giving their names and institutional or other affiliation.
e. One hundred (100) individual members constitute a quorum.
f. Debate shall be limited to five minutes for each speaker; no speaker may have the floor twice until all who wish to speak have spoken.
g. At the beginning of the meeting the President will announce the agenda, call for additions or amendments, and call for a vote to approve the agenda. After the agenda has been adopted by the majority of the members present and voting, it can be departed from only by the general consent or by two-thirds vote if any members request a vote.
h. Should the business meeting be held virtually, where a quorum of eligible voting members cannot be confirmed nor an official vote taken, the rules of the business meeting shall be waived. Resolutions or other business brought forward by members will be handled separately as deemed appropriate by the Council and in accordance with the SAA constitution and bylaws.
i. Aside from the rules above, Robert's Rules of Order (latest revised edition) will govern the business meeting.
The records of the Society, of the Council, and of other units of the Society shall be preserved by the officers, Councilors, the Executive Director, and unit chairs, and shall be promptly turned over by them to their successors. Noncurrent records shall be appraised by direction of the Executive Director upon recommendation of the Society's archivist, those records of continuing value shall be placed for preservation in the Society's official archives, who shall determine a policy of access to these records.
In accordance with the laws of the District of Columbia (currently 29 D.C. Code 1047), the Society may be dissolved upon the vote of two-thirds (2/3rds) of the members present and voting at a meeting called for such purpose following notification at least ninety (90) days in advance of the meeting. In the event of dissolution, the Society's property, funds, and other assets shall pass to whatever agency or agencies may be designated by the Council in office at the time of dissolution.
Constitution: As amended August 1997, August 2010, August 2011, October 2016, March 2021, March 2023.
Bylaws: As amended November 3, 2006; August 10, 2009; August 27, 2011; June 3, 2016; October 28, 2016; March 2021; October 2023.
Approved by the Council: June 1991
Revised: July 2013
1 The source for Section II.A. is the Constitution of the Society of American Archivists, Article V.A.1.
2 This list of duties is based on Richard T. Ingram, Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards, Second Edition (BoardSource, 2009).
3 The source for Section II.B.2. is the Constitution of the Society of American Archivists, Article VII.
4 Per resolution adopted by the Council at its January 30-February 1, 1987, meeting and reaffirmed at the June 2-4, 1989 meeting.
5 Per resolution adopted by the Council at its June 5-7, 1987, meeting and reaffirmed at its June 2-4, 1989 meeting.
Article V of the Society's constitution states that the president serves a one-year term of office subsequent to a one-year term of office as vice president. The terms of office begin at the conclusion of the Annual Business Meeting after the election. Because the vice president automatically becomes president, the president is ineligible for immediate reelection. According to the SAA Foundation's bylaws, the SAA president also serves on the SAA Foundation Board of Directors in his or her capacity as an SAA Executive Committee member. Subsequent to serving one year as SAA president, the SAA immediate past president serves one year on the SAA Foundation Board of Directors.
Bylaw 1 of the Society's bylaws states, "The president shall direct and coordinate the affairs of the Society, preside at all business meetings of the Society, of the Council, and its Executive Committee, and shall perform such duties as may be directed by the Council."
1. Preside over the Society's business meeting at the Annual Meeting.
2. Serve as a member of and preside over meetings of the Council.
3. Serve as a member of and chair the Executive Committee. The president shall call the Committee into session.
4. May at his or her discretion appoint the chairs and the members of SAA committees, boards, task forces, and working groups, as well as representatives whose positions are created or become vacant during his or her term in office, according to the guidelines for each of these and SAA practice. Traditionally, the vice president / president-elect appoints representatives and chairs and members of SAA bodies who will commence their service at the beginning of his or her term as president. In general, the vice president fills vacancies occurring in mid-year in consultation with the president.
5. Create and terminate standing committees, task forces, and other groups with the advice and approval of the Council.
6. Direct representatives to outside committees and boards to present issues of importance or concern to the president, the executive director, the Council, or the Society at large before those committees and boards. The representatives shall bring the discussion of such issues by the outside committees and boards before the Executive Committee or the full Council for consideration and further advice.
7. Sign the current employment contract with the executive director.
8. Direct the search for a new executive director when necessary.
9. Appoint newly-elected Council members to Council committees.
Approved by Council: June 1991
Revised: January 1992, May 2011
Article V of the Society's constitution states that the vice president is elected and serves a one-year term of office. The term of office begins at the conclusion of the Annual Business Meeting after the election. The vice president shall automatically become president at the conclusion of the following year's Annual Meeting. According to the SAA Foundation's Bylaws, SAA vice president also serves on the SAA Foundation Board of Directors in his or her capacity as an SAA Executive Committee member.
Bylaw 1 of the Society's bylaws states "The vice president shall perform the duties of the president in case the president is absent or incapacitated and, in case of a vacancy in the presidency, shall assume that office and hold it for the remainder of the term."
1. Serve as a member of the Executive Committee.
2. Serve as a member of the Council.
3. In the absence of the president, preside at business meeting(s) of the Society and meetings of the Council.
4. Appoint the chairs and members of SAA committees, boards, task forces, working groups, and representatives according to the guidelines for each of these and SAA practice. Traditionally, the vice president / president-elect appoints representatives, chairs, and members of SAA bodies who will commence their service at the beginning of his or her term as president. The vice president fills vacancies occurring in mid-year in consultation with the president.
5. Appoint the chair and members of the Program Committee for the meeting over which he/she will preside as president.
6. Appoint the chair and members of the Host Committee for the meeting over which he/she will preside as president.
7. The vice president / president-elect appoints the chair of the Nominating Committee in the event of a tie for that office, according to the procedures in Bylaw 5.A.
Approved by Council: June 1991
Revised: January 1992, May 2011
Article V of the Society's constitution states that the treasurer shall be elected for a term of three (3) years beginning at the conclusion of the Annual Business Meeting following the election and shall be ineligible for immediate reelection. According to the SAA Foundation's bylaws, the SAA treasurer also serves on the SAA Foundation Board of Directors in his or her capacity as an SAA Executive Committee member.
Bylaw 1 of the Society states, "The treasurer shall be responsible for: planning and formulating financial policy in consultation with the Finance Committee and the Executive Director; recommending such policies to the Council; reviewing the annual budget before its submission to the Finance Committee and to the Council; internal auditing of all Society financial operations; providing an annual report on the Society's finances; and investing special funds and endowments on the advice and consent of the Finance Committee and the Council. In the absence of the president and vice president, the treasurer shall preside at business meeting(s) of the Society and meetings of the Council."
1. Serve as chair of the Finance Committee.
2. Prepare an annual treasurer's report. Present the report at the Annual Business Meeting and submit it for publication in The American Archivist.
3. In consultation with the Finance Committee and the Executive Director, recommend an annual budget to the Council.
4. Analyze all SAA financial statements. Report financial status, trends, and problems at each Council meeting. Make recommendations to the Executive Director and the Council.
5. Consult with the SAA office to assure that an annual audit is performed. Analyze audit results and report findings to the Council.
6. Working with the Finance Committee, oversee investment policy for special funds and endowments.
7. Hold the Society's copy of the current employment contract with the executive director.
8. Ensure that the annual giving program is undertaken by the executive director.
9. In the absence of the president and vice president, preside at business meeting(s) of the Society and meetings of the Council.
10. Work with the Council, the Finance Committee, and the executive director to achieve a balanced annual budget and an adequate reserve fund.
11. Together with the Council, approve all SAA proposals for external financial support before submission to the funding agencies.
12. Together with the Finance Committee and the Council, triennially review the dues structure to assure its sufficiency.
13. Serve as a member of the Executive Committee.
Approved by Council: June 1991; revised August 2009.
Approved by the Council: June 1991
Revised: May 2011, January 2012, July 2013, July 2014
1 The source for Section III.A.1 is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists, Bylaw 4.
2 The source for Section III.A.2 is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists Foundation, Article V, Section 5.2.1.
3 Unless otherwise noted, the source for Section III.B is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists, Bylaw 4.
4 Regarding investments, the Executive Committee acts in conjunction with the Finance Committee as specified in that Committee’s charge.
5 The language in Section III.B.1.d mirrors Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists, Bylaw 11, which originated as a proposed bylaw amendment adopted by Council at the May 24-26, 2011 meeting and approved by the membership at the August 2011 Annual Business Meeting.
6 SAA's Code of Conduct was adopted by the Council in an online vote in July 2014. A review cycle concurrent with that of SAA's Equal Opportunity/Non-Discrimination Policy was put in place, as well as a process for addressing violations.
The Council is responsible for the following3:
Approved by the Council: June 1991
Revised by Council: February 2003, May 2010, August 2010, January 2012, July 2013
1 Per a resolution adopted at the January 30-February 1, 1987, meeting of the Council, reaffirmed at the June 2-4, 1989, meeting, and amended at the June 11-14, 1992, and August 28, 2001, meetings.
2 Per Article V. of the SAA constitution.
3 Derived from Richard T. Ingram, Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards, Second Edition (BoardSource 2009).
4 The process for amending the SAA constitution is spelled out in X. Amendments.
5 The process for creating and amending the SAA bylaws is spelled out in Article IX. of the constitution.
6 See Bylaw 4.
I. Purpose
The Council Subcommittee to Review/Revise the Governance Manual reviews and revises the Governance Manual, taking as its charge both identifying long-needed updates and ensuring that new Council actions are reflected quickly in the relevant sections of the Manual.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The subcommittee shall consist of the Council's three second-year members.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Council Subcommittee reports to the SAA Council.
Approved by Council: August 25, 2008
According to the SAA Bylaws, 7.: "In the event of grievances as specified below, there shall be a personnel grievance committee."
"The committee shall hear grievances:
"The decision of the personnel grievance committee concerning matters involving the executive director shall be binding upon the parties to the dispute, provided that the decision is in accordance with applicable federal and state laws and the constitution and by-laws of the Society."
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
"The committee shall be composed of five members, each of whom must have served the Society as a councilor or as an elected officer within the past five years, but who may not be serving in such capacity at the time of the work of the committee. Two members of the committee shall be chosen by the Council, two members by the executive director, and the fifth member by decision of the first four members chosen. The fifth member will serve as chair of the committee."
The Personnel Grievance Committee reports to the SAA Council.
The SAA Executive Director also serves as executive director of the SAA Foundation (unless the Foundation executive director position is filled by another individual).2
The Executive Committee is required to conduct a performance review of the executive director annually according to procedures mutually agreed to by the Executive Committee and the executive director.3
Approved by the Council: June 1991
Revised: September 1994, May 2011, July 2013
1 The source for Section V.A. is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists, Bylaw 2, and directives from the Council.
2 The source for Section V.C.1 is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists Foundation, Bylaw V.
3 The source for section V.D.1 is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists, Bylaw 4.
Categories of SAA membership are defined in Section III.A. of SAA’s constitution: http://www2.archivists.org/governance/handbook/section1/constitution.
Benefits of SAA membership are described on the "Member Benefits" page: http://www2.archivists.org/membership.
Approved by the Council: August 2006
Revised: July 2013
Adopted by the Council: January 1995
Revised: July 2013
1 The source for Sections VII.A and B. is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists, Bylaw 6.
I. Purpose
Revised in January 2003, the charge of the joint committee is:
The ALA/SAA/AAM Joint Committee on Archives, Libraries, and Museums consists of 15 members, five from each association, with co-chairs appointed by each association biennially for two-year terms.
See also: The CALM Wiki
I. Purpose
The Editorial Board advises and assists the Editor of American Archivist in the editorial review and production of the journal and in establishing and implementing editorial policies and procedures for peer review of submitted manuscripts.
The Editorial Board also assists with the evaluation of the Journal Editor as requested by the Council.
II. Board Size, Length of Terms, and Selection
The Editorial Board consists of the Editor, who serves as chair of the board, the Reviews Editor, and twelve individual board members.
The Editor is appointed by the Council. The Editor's term is three years and customarily begins on or about January 1; however, the exact date on which the individual selected assumes the responsibilities of editorship is negotiated by the individual and the Executive Director. An incumbent Editor may be re-appointed for one additional term as Editor. An individual may not serve more than two consecutive terms, but may apply for the position at a later time.
The Reviews Editor is appointed for a three-year term by the Editor. The Reviews Editor may serve no more than two consecutive terms. The Reviews Editor is selected based on demonstrated excellent writing and editorial skills and knowledge of current research and writing in the archives field.
The twelve individuals comprising the board are appointed for four-year terms that are staggered so that one-fourth are appointed each year. At least one member of the Editorial Board shall be an international representative (that is, an individual who lives and works outside of the United States). Board members are nominated by the Editor and appointed by the SAA Vice President based on the list of nominees. In the event that the Vice President is unable to appoint a person nominated by the Editor, the Vice President asks the Editor to nominate another person for appointment. Individuals serving on the Editorial Board are selected because of their knowledge of archival theory, methodology, and practice; expertise in research strategies and methodologies; and experience in archival research and publication.
The Editorial Board also reflects a diversity of archival institutions and functional expertise and the demographic and geographic breadth of the profession. An individual may serve no more than two consecutive terms on the board.
The chair of the Publications Board serves as an ex officio member of the Editorial Board.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
A. The Editor
The Editor coordinates Editorial Board activities. To maintain the editorial independence of the journal as a peer-refereed professional journal, the Editor manages the manuscript review process and makes final decisions for publication. The Editor is responsible for the solicitation, selection, peer review, and final approval of articles, features, and photographs. He or she works with authors and prospective authors on necessary revisions, reviews page proofs before publication, and works closely with the Reviews Editor, a copyeditor, an indexer, and the SAA staff, who handle journal production and business matters.
The Editor uses the Editorial Board listserv as the principal means of communication with the Editorial Board about editorial activities, including, but not limited to, statistical summary of submissions and decisions about submissions, negotiations for special issues, special achievements, problems and needs, and suggestions for Editorial Board policies.
The Editor also serves as an ex officio member of the Publications Board.
B. Reviews Editor
The Reviews Editor works in conjunction with the Editor to commission review essays; selects books and exhibits (print and online) to review; assembles, maintains, and refreshes a stable of reviewers; assigns items to be reviewed and oversees the reviews process; and edits copy for the reviews section in each issue of the journal.
C. Individual Board Members
Individual Editorial Board members assist the Editor in developing and implementing editorial policies and procedures, encouraging submissions and soliciting manuscripts to be considered for publication in American Archivist, promoting content from current and recent issues, recommending other manuscript reviewers, reviewing manuscript submissions for possible publication in the journal, and contributing as needed with reviews of professional literature and resources.
Individual board members also assist with the review of the Editor’s performance and may assist in the search for a new Editor.
D. SAA Office
The SAA office coordinates production aspects of the journal and handles business matters, including:
IV. Meetings
The Editorial Board meets at least annually during SAA’s Annual Meeting.
The SAA Executive Director, Director of Publishing, and Editorial and Production Coordinator customarily participate in all meetings of the Editorial Board.
V. Budget
The Council, as part of its budget process, approves the budget (prepared by the SAA office) for American Archivist.
VI. Reporting and Editor Performance Evaluation Procedures
The Editor reports to the Council. The Editor submits a report three times a year in advance of each Council meeting. The report includes a summary of the Editor’s activities, the production of the journal, issues and concerns, and any changes to editorial policies and procedures.
The following procedures apply to the annual performance evaluation of the Editor, which isbased on performance criteria, goals and objectives, and a formal review process. The purpose of this process is to form a basis for considering renewal of the Editor’s contract, to provide feedback to the Editor, to discuss issues of common concern, and to recognize achievements. The Executive Director establishes a schedule for this evaluation process based on a timetable for renegotiation of the contract with the Editor.
The Executive Director shares with the Editor the statement of criteria for performance evaluation, stipulating elements considered appropriate and relevant for evaluating the Editor's performance on an annual basis. This statement must be reviewed and approved by the Council.
The Executive Director solicits written and/or oral comments on the Editor’s performance from the Editorial Board, Council liaison, various SAA staff, three authors who have recently published in the journal, an author in the process of publishing in the journal, and any others who are in a position to provide useful perspectives. Also to be considered are comments received from SAA members or any other information that the Council deems appropriate. The Editor also completes a self-evaluation.
The Executive Director compiles all feedback received and disseminates this information to the Editor and the Council. The Council reviews the feedback regarding the Editor's performance and takes appropriate action. If feasible, the Council conducts a conference call with the Editor; otherwise, the Council conveys conclusions to the Executive Director to share directly with the Editor.
In years in which the incumbent Editor is eligible for reappointment, the Executive Director contacts the incumbent Editor to determine if he or she is interested in serving a second term. If the Editor expresses such an interest, the matter is referred to the Council for evaluation. The Council makes a recommendation regarding reappointment of the Editor or directs the Executive Director to implement a search for a new Editor as outlined in VII. Editor Search Process.
VII. Editor Search Process
In years in which the incumbent Editor is ineligible for reappointment, is not offered reappointment, or chooses not to serve a second term, the Council and staff work together to conduct a search for a new Editor.
A. Qualifications of Editor
The Editor of American Archivist possesses the following qualifications:
B. Search Committee
In January of the year prior to the expiration of the incumbent Editor's term of office, the Executive Director:
The search committee reviews the applications, interviews candidates, and makes a recommendation to the Council on the selection of an Editor. (Should the search committee believe that there are no qualified candidates, or that additional qualified candidates are desirable, the committee is empowered to solicit additional nominations to supplement those already received.)
The Council, with due consideration of the selection committee's recommendation, makes the final decision.
Approved by the Council: February 5, 2005.
Revised: May 2014; June 2019.
I. Purpose
The Appointments Committee assists the vice-president/president-elect with the appointment process by identifying a pool of potential candidates for appointed positions to committees, boards, and tasks forces, and to official SAA representative positions. The Committee uses the volunteer self-nomination form, for those members who wish to be considered for appointments, and consults with current appointed group chairs for possible candidates. The Committee surveys the overall list of current and potential appointments to achieve quality, balance, and diversity of appointees both overall and within each unit. At the same time, the committee maintains an openness to appointing new people, especially through the early-career member program.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The committee consists of three to six members (including the committee chair and vice chair). The newly elected SAA vice president confirms the committee chair and appoints the vice chair prior to the Annual Meeting at which s/he takes office. The vice chair serves a one-year term. After the Annual Meeting, and upon confirmation, the vice-chair shall automatically serve as committee chair for a one-year term. Regular committee members serve for one-year to assist in the appointment process. Membership should reflect the diverse groups represented within SAA.
The immediate past chair of the Appointments Committee shall serve on the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows for a one-year term.
III. Reporting Procedures
After consulting the list of volunteers and leaders' recommendations, theCommittee prepares a list of possible candidates for each committee, task force, board, or representative position to assist the vice president in selecting nominees for these posts. The Vice President is responsible for contacting nominees to confirm acceptance of the appointment.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Appointments Committee is responsible for the following:
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1998. Revised: November 2016, May 2022, November 2023.
I. Purpose
The Archival Repatriation Committee works to ensure that the organization's services, activities, policies, communications, and products support the goal of supporting archivists in repatriating and receiving archival materials. It coordinates with various SAA entities, external organizations, and originating communities and monitors, evaluates, advocates for, and reports on matters relating to the repatriation of archival materials.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The committee consists of six members and two co-chairs, who are appointed by the SAA vice president/president-elect. The immediate past chair of the Native American Archives Section serves as a committee member for a one-year term. Committee members serve staggered three-year terms. The co-chairs shall serve staggered two-year terms. The vice president/president-elect shall appoint one committee member after consultation with the executive director of the Association of Tribal Archives, Libraries, and Museums.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
IV. Reporting Procedures
The Repatriation Committee reports to the Council and works closely with its Council liaison, the President, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council’s needs. The chair is responsible for submitting an annual report to the Council, and may also submit items for Council action or discussion and feedback as necessary. The chair also is responsible for ensuring that minutes of Repatriation Committee meetings are prepared and posted on the Repatriation Committee’s SAA-hosted website to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping requirements.
V. Meetings
The committee shall meet virtually as needed to conduct its work. The committee may conduct its business by email, telephone, or virtual meeting during the course of the year.
Approved by the SAA Council, May 2022.
I. Purpose
The Awards Committee has five major purposes:
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Awards Committee is composed of two committee co-chairs and the chairs of each of the awards subcommittees.
Annually the vice president/president-elect appoints one Awards Committee co-chair, who serves for one year as junior co-chair and one year as senior co-chair.
The selection, size, and length of term of each subcommittee is determined by the Council upon adoption of a new award and may be modified by the Council. Generally subcommittees comprise three members, each of whom serves for three years and as subcommittee chair in her/his third year. To ensure that appropriate expertise is represented on certain awards subcommittees, however, the Council has determined the following exceptions:
III. Reporting Procedures
Awards are announced during the SAA Annual Meeting, and on the SAA website and in the newsletter following the Annual Meeting. The co-chairs represent the Committee when meeting with other SAA committees and with the SAA Council and staff.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Awards Committee publicizes SAA awards through announcements in the SAA newsletter and in other publications as appropriate. It also may publicize the awards during SAA Annual Meetings or conduct other activities to make archivists more aware of SAA awards. The Committee also solicits nominations for SAA awards by contacting individuals, archives organizations, and other groups that may be aware of worthy nominees.
The Committee establishes a deadline for awards nominations to be sent to the committee chair. The Awards co-chairs distribute nominations to the appropriate subcommittee. Each subcommittee evaluates nominations it receives on the basis of written criteria and selects award winner(s) as appropriate. Policy questions regarding criteria or eligibility for an award may be directed to the Awards co-chairs, the SAA Executive Director, or the Council for clarification.
The Awards co-chairs, in conjunction with the Awards Committee and the SAA Executive Director, plan an appropriate awards ceremony for the SAA Annual Meeting. Typically the ceremony is led by the Awards Committee senior co-chair, with each subcommittee chair presenting the award for which he/she is responsible. In addition to presenting the award, the subcommittee chair prepares an awards citation that may be read at the ceremony.
From time to time, the Committee reviews awards criteria and procedures and recommends any revisions that may be appropriate. The Committee may recommend new awards for the Council's consideration. The Committee also evaluates awards and changes to guidelines proposed by members of the Society and makes recommendations to the Council concerning the proposals. Should new awards be approved, the Awards Committee is responsible for drafting appropriate award criteria and procedures.
V. Meetings
The Committee meets at the Society's Annual Meeting.
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1988
Revised: January 1993, January 2007, August 2011
See also
I. Purpose
The Committee on Education has four complementary purposes: 1) to assess the profession's educational needs; 2) to prepare and promote standards for archival education programs based in graduate schools; 3) to prepare and promote post-appointment and continuing education and training programs; and 4) to provide advice to the SAA Education Office.
The Committee on Education's work is based on the following assumptions:
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Committee on Education consists of eleven members (including a chair, vice chair, and immediate past chair) appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms. The vice chair is appointed by the Vice President normally from among the committee members serving the second year of their appointment. The vice chair assumes the chair in his or her third year on the committee. Following their term as chair, the immediate past chair shall serve an additional one-year term as an ex officio member of the committee. The chair of the Digital Archives Specialist Subcommittee and the SAA Education Director serve as ex officio members of the committee.
The membership of the committee shall include a mix of archival educators and practicing archivists with expertise in one or more of the ACE categories and in continuing education development.
The vice chair of the Committee on Education serves as an ex officio member of the Theodore Calvin Pease Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee and as an informal advisor to the Students and New Archives Professionals Section.
III. Reporting Procedures
The committee reports to the Council, providing a formal written report in the fall of each year and reporting on special initiatives as necessary or requested.
The committee works closely with the Education Director, serving in an advisory capacity in education-related projects and programs operated out of the executive office.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee on Education's charge is to review the needs for continuing education, assist the SAA Education Office in developing relevant programming, and provide guidance to the Society in this area. The tasks and responsibilities of the Committee include:
V. Meetings
The committee meets at the SAA Annual Meeting. The committee shall meet monthly; additional mid-year meetings are scheduled depending on the availability of financial resources.
Approved by the SAA Council: August 2008
Revised: January 1992, January 1998, May 2005, August 2008, May 2011, November 2016, May 2022.
I. Purpose
The Digital Archives Specialist (DAS) Subcommittee is responsible for ensuring that the Digital Archives Specialist curriculum remains up-to-date. Because the curriculum is likely to require frequent changes, the Subcommittee suggests and implements changes to the curriculum (including the examinations) as needed. In addition, the Subcommittee is responsible for ensuring the currency of the core competencies for a DAS certificate, overseeing the learning outcomes to ensure that they support the core competencies, and supporting the development of new courses.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Digital Archives Specialist (DAS) Subcommittee consists of ten members (including a chair) appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered four-year terms. Each year, a vice chair will be appointed from among the upcoming second-year members and will serve as vice chair in the second year, as chair in the third year, and as past chair in the fourth year of her/his term. The subcommittee chair serves as an ex officio member of the Committee on Education. The SAA Education Director serves as an ex officio member of the subcommittee.
The membership of the subcommittee shall comprise a mix of practicing archivists with e-records/digital experience and or knowledge, teaching experience, technical skills, expertise covering the archival spectrum, and administrative or supervisory experience. Ideally, the subcommittee as a whole will reflect individual and institutional diversity. The majority of members must have a DAS certificate to serve on the subcommittee. Exceptions may be made on a case-by-case basis.
Outgoing committee members will be granted a two-year grace period to allow adequate time for the necessary requirements to maintain and renew their DAS Certificate. Subcommittee members may not sit for the DAS Comprehensive Exam during their term on the subcommittee and must wait at least two year after their term ends to sit for the exam. Courses for which a committee member serves as a course shepherd (i.e. liaison) do not apply toward DAS Certificate renewal.
Members can expect to spend four to five hours per month on subcommittee work.
III. Reporting Procedures
The subcommittee reports to the Committee on Education, providing updates at each meeting and intermittently as appropriate.
The subcommittee works closely with the Education Director, serving in an advisory capacity on education-related projects and programs operated out of the executive office.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
V. Meetings
When resources are available, the subcommittee meets up to two times each year and via monthly conference calls.
Approved by the SAA Council: May 2011
Revised: April 2012, January 2014, June 2016, February 2017, May 2017.
I. Purpose
The Graduate Archival Education Subcommittee of the Committee on Education is charged with reviewing needs for graduate archival education, drafting and promulgating guidelines, and providing guidance to the Society in this area. The Subcommittee establishes its own agenda in conjunction with the Committee on Education, except as otherwise directed by the Council to perform specific tasks. Due to resource limitations, SAA and the GAE do not address accreditation issues.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The subcommittee consists of six members (including a chair and vice chair) appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms. The vice chair is appointed by the SAA Vice President normally from among the subcommittee members serving in the second year of appointment. The vice chair assumes the chair in her or his third year on the subcommittee.
The membership of the subcommittee shall include five archival educators and a student or new professional, all selected with an eye to including expertise, perspective, and community input from around the profession. The chair may bring on ad hoc volunteers for expertise as required. The chair serves as a member of the Committee on Education and as a liaison to the Archival Educators Section.
III. Reporting Procedures
The subcommittee reports to the Committee on Education. The subcommittee chair or designee provides updates during Committee conference calls and attends the Committee’s in-person meetings.
The subcommittee works closely with the Education Director, serving in an advisory capacity on education-related projects and programs operated out of the Executive Office.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Graduate Archival Education Subcommittee is charged with reviewing needs for graduate archival education, drafting and promulgating guidelines, and providing guidance to the Society in this area. Duties and responsibilities include:
V. Meetings
The Graduate Archival Education Subcommittee meets via monthly conference calls and may conduct in-person meetings when a need is demonstrated and financial resources are available.
Approved by the SAA Council: November 2016.
I. Purpose
The Committee on Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) advocates for and addresses issues related to ethical and professional conduct within the archival profession. CEPC supports and promotes the creation of education and outreach resources and programing relating to the Code of Ethics for Archivists and the Core Values of Archivists statement and periodically reviews each document for currency.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The CEPC consists of six members appointed by the SAA vice president for staggered three-year terms. Typically, two members are appointed annually. Two of the six members serve as co-chairs during their last two years on the committee. In consultation with the co-chairs, the SAA vice president appoints a junior co-chair from among the rising second-year committee members each year for a two-year term, so that the terms of the two co-chairs are staggered. Additionally, an Early-Career member will serve a one-year term. The co-chairs work with SAA personnel to select this member from the applicants.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
IV. Reporting Procedures
CEPC reports to the Council and works closely with its Council liaison, the President, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council’s needs. The co-chairs are responsible for submitting an annual report to the Council, and may also submit items for Council action or discussion and feedback as necessary. The co-chairs also are responsible for ensuring that minutes of CEPC meetings are prepared and posted on the CEPC’s SAA-hosted website to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping requirements.
Last Revised: June 2009; May 2014: July 2023
I. Purpose
The Committee provides strategic information and advice to the SAA Council to enhance SAA’s capacity to promote the value of archives and archivists to institutions, communities, and society. The Committee recommends to the SAA Council the public awareness priorities on which SAA should focus its attention and resources, within the context of the Society’s mission and strategic plan. In addition, the Committee works with staff and outside counsel to develop programs that promote the value and role(s) of archivists and archives nationwide.
The Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) is distinguished from the Committee on Advocacy and Public Policy (CAPP) by virtue of the audiences with which each group generally interacts and whose opinions it seeks to influence. CAPP generally is concerned with influencing legislative and regulatory (i.e., public policy) decisions of government at all levels; COPA generally is concerned with influencing opinions about the value of archivists and archives among the general public and stakeholder groups other than legislators and regulators (e.g., archives users, institutional resource allocators, etc.). The two committees may collaborate on identification of key audiences, messages, and mediums to ensure a coordinated approach to SAA’s priorities and communications.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term:
The Committee consists of eight members (including a chair and vice chair) who are appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms. The individual who is selected by the Vice President as vice chair, typically from among the third-year members, becomes vice chair in the fourth year of service and accedes to chair in the fifth year. Individuals may be reappointed to the Committee.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee has the following duties and responsibilities:
A. Acting proactively, the Committee:
B. Acting in cooperation with other organizations and groups:
C. Acting in response to requests or events, the Committee:
IV. Reporting
The Committee works closely with the President, its Council Liaison, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council's needs and is working in coordination with the staff office. In certain cases, when time is of the essence, Committee communications with the President and Executive Director may be discussed and acted upon solely by the Executive Committee.
Adopted by the SAA Council: March 17, 2014.
I. Purpose
The Committee’s purpose is to provide strategic information and advice to the SAA Council to enhance SAA’s capacity to address public policy issues and concerns affecting archivists, archives, the archival profession, and its stakeholders. The Committee recommends to the SAA Council the public policy priorities on which SAA should focus its attention and resources, within the context of the Society’s mission and strategic plan. Although the Committee's purview is broad, its overarching priorities are issues related to the preservation of and access to records of enduring value that affect archivists, archival institutions, and users of the archival record.
II. Size, Composition, Selection, and Length of Terms
The Committee consists of eight members. Six members are appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms; a vice chair and chair serve one-year terms.
The SAA Vice President appoints a vice chair from among the Committee members serving in their third year. That individual serves a fourth year as vice chair and accedes to chair in the fifth year. Individuals may be reappointed to the Committee.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee has the following duties and responsibilities:
A. Acting proactively, the Committee:
B. Acting in response to requests or events, the Committee:
IV. Reporting
The Committee works closely with the President, its Council Liaison, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council's needs and is working in coordination with the staff office. In certain cases, when time is of the essence, Committee communications with the President and Executive Director may be discussed and acted upon solely by the Executive Committee.
Approved by the SAA Council: September 2013
Name change to Committee on Public Policy (COPP) approved by the SAA Council: May 2016
I. Purpose
The Committee on Research, Data, and Assessment provides access to significant and useful data and research about SAA, American archives, and their users that evidence the value of archives for society and help us improve our services to SAA members and to our consumers. The Committee will work to conduct or support relevant research and to create, gather, and preserve data by directing and engaging in several areas of activity:
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Committee shall consist of a minimum of eleven appointed members (including two co-chairs) serving staggered three-year terms with the possibility of reappointment. The Vice President, on behalf of the Council and with the recommendation of the Committee, appoints new members and co-chairs. Because the Committee may benefit from members who possess specialized skills and abilities that may vary from time to time, a Request for Applicant-based process may be necessary to help surface the best candidates in any particular appointment cycle. Maximum Committee size is variable, depending on the number, nature, and complexity of the projects and activities in which the Committee is engaged at any particular time.
To better facilitate the Committee’s diverse work, members may be distributed among multiple project- or activity-based subcommittees, each of which is headed by a subcommittee chair appointed by the Committee co-chairs to repeatable annual terms. The Committee co-chairs may recommend that the SAA Council form (and disband) subcommittees from time to time, based on current needs.
The vice chair of the Committee on Education will serve as an ex officio member of the committee. The outgoing co-chair may serve as an ex officio member of the committee for up to one year after rotating off the committee.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Committee co-chairs shall submit a report for each Council meeting, summarizing current activities and projects and progress toward stated objectives. As directed by the Council, the Committee co-chairs may submit a written report upon the conclusion of specific projects.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee shall enjoy a great deal of latitude in developing and engaging in research projects and data accumulation. In so doing, the Committee must maintain frequent communication with the Council, which approves and advises on the Committee’s strategic directions, tactics, resources, activities, and projects. This communication is facilitated by the Committee co-chairs, who must ensure that the Council is aware of emergent planning and directional changes.
The Committee maintains responsibility for achieving its purpose by:
V. Meetings
The Committee shall conduct its business largely through email and conference calls. The Committee shall meet formally each year at the SAA Annual Meeting. Any additional in-person meetings that may be necessary shall occur only with Council approval and funding.
Approved by the SAA Council, November 2018, May 2022, August 2022.
I. Purpose
The Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows selects Fellows of the Society in accordance with criteria and procedures established and approved by the Council and in accordance with the Society's Constitution and Bylaws. From time to time the committee also performs other tasks assigned by the Council.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The committee is composed of the three most recent past presidents of the Society, three Fellows who are elected by the Council at its winter meeting and who serve one-year terms, and the immediate past chairs of the Appointments Committee and the Nominating Committee to serve one-year terms. Current members of the committee, current members of the Council, and Society staff members are not eligible for election. The past president who has served the longest on the committee serves as chair of the committee.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows elects new Fellows from individuals nominated by members of the Society. Individual members, primary contacts of institutional members, student members, and associate members are eligible to nominate SAA Fellows. The committee establishes a deadline for receipt of nominations well in advance of the Annual Meeting and develops a standard form for use in nominations in consultation with the Executive Director. The committee also ensures that the deadline is publicized and that the form is readily available. Nominations must include complete biographical information, including academic degrees and honors, pertinent professional and technical training, professional publications, Society activities, and a narrative description of the professional contributions that merit designation as a Fellow.
The Constitution provides that no more than five percent (5%) of the total individual membership reported at the last annual business meeting of the Society shall be elected as Fellows; that at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the members of the Committee on the Selection of Fellows must approve each candidate for a nomination to be approved; and that no member of the Society shall be elected a Fellow who has not been a full member of the Society in good standing for at least seven (7) years immediately preceding election. In approving nominations, the Committee shall be guided by achievement in each of the following criteria:
While serving on this committee standing members may not formally endorse the candidacies of any of the nominations for consideration by the committee, nor participate actively in organizing the submission of an individual nomination. Similarly, when accepting appointment to the committee, Fellows selected to serve by Council should be required to accept as a condition of service that they will not formally endorse the candidacies of any of the nominations for consideration by the committee, nor participate actively in organizing the submission of an individual nomination.
A 75% favorable vote by members of the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows is required for election as a Fellow.
GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS
Nominations should provide all the information necessary for evaluating the nominee. The evaluation should focus on the quality, quantity, and applicability of the nomination to the criteria. The evaluators should not “fill in” evidence that may be missing. This helps ensure that all nominations are evaluated from a common perspective. Evaluators may or may not personally know or be closely familiar with a nominee and their professional career, so in any given year, those who are on the evaluation committee could influence a decision if factors not included in the nomination are part of the assessment.
Focus of the award is for service to the Society of American Archivists. The nomination needs to demonstrate that the individual has made sufficient contributions to the Society to be named an SAA Fellow. This is an award that honors outstanding contributions through active participation in and efforts on behalf of SAA as well as to the broader archival profession. This is not an award for outstanding contributions to the archival profession nationally or in a region or state without demonstrable contributions to SAA as well. While a nominee’s activities in other venues strengthens the evidence in some of the criteria areas, they do not replace evidence of service in SAA. There are individuals who may be “well-known” but have not participated in the functions and activities of SAA. Such individuals may be appropriate for other awards such as the J. Franklin Jameson Archival Advocacy Award or distinguished recognition from the SAA Council.
Nominations should demonstrate the nominee meets all criteria. The nomination should demonstrate both how the nominee meets criteria as well as explaining the strengths and impact of their contributions. The nomination should not simply list those items, but explain in a clear and compelling manner how they are superior or exceptional. Nominees will likely have more contributions in some areas compared to others; the final decision to approve a nomination should be based on the whole of contributions demonstrating a significant overall contribution, while meeting the requirement of contributions in each criterion.
Letters provided should demonstrate the quality of the nominee’s contributions. Letters may come from a range of individuals including professional colleagues, individuals in other professions or communities, and users who have worked with or benefited from the nominee’s efforts. These letters do not need to be from Fellows, Past Presidents, or those who might be perceived as having status in SAA. The purpose is to demonstrate the quality of the nominee’s contributions, not restate how the individual meets the criteria.
Comparability of assessment. In evaluating each nomination, evaluators should strive to ensure that their assessments are consistent and comparable between nominations. An evaluator’s knowledge of an individual’s career, or their particular area of expertise and professional focus, should not lead to a more (or less) favorable assessment.
Recusal. Evaluators should recuse themselves from evaluating a nomination when they have a direct working relationship or other professional or personal relationship that may be perceived as too close for objectivity. This might include an individual’s supervisors, supervisees, partners in current or recent professional positions, or partners/spouses or other close relatives. Recusal by any member of the evaluation committee is not a negative factor for the evaluation, but reflects the intent to ensure fair evaluation for all.
See the SAA Governance Manual Section XI: Fellows for more information.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The committee chair informs the Executive Director of election results as soon as possible so that certificates may be prepared. The chair confidentially informs new Fellows of their election in advance of the Annual Meeting and publicly presents certificates to them at a ceremony at the Annual Meeting. The chair also ensures that nominators of other individuals are informed of the results of their nominations.
V. Meetings
The Committee consults by mail, telephone, and/or in person after nominations have been received so that each nominee's qualifications can be discussed and evaluated. The election of Fellows also may be held by telephone or in person, confirmed in writing, or by mail.
Approved by the SAA Council: February 1990
Revised: January 1992, August 2008, February 2010, March 2020, May 2022.
See also:
I. Purpose
The Diversity Committee works to ensure that the organization's services, activities, policies, communications, and products support the goal of a more diverse SAA and professional archival community. It functions as a catalyst for new diversity-related initiatives, developed in coordination with various SAA entities, and monitors, evaluates, advocates for, and reports on matters pertaining to the diversity of archival practitioners and documentation.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The committee consists of nine members, including the chair and vice chair, who are appointed by the SAA vice president/president-elect. Committee members serve staggered three-year terms. In consultation with the chair, the SAA vice president appoints a vice chair from among committee members with at least one year of experience on the committee. The vice chair serves a one-year term, then accedes to a one-year term as committee chair.
The chairs of the following member affinity groups with interests in diversity issues serve as ex officio members of the committee:
III. Duties and Responsibilities
IV. Reporting Procedures
The Diversity Committee reports to the Council and works closely with its Council liaison, the President, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council’s needs. The chair is responsible for submitting an annual report to the Council, and may also submit items for Council action or discussion and feedback as necessary. The chair also is responsible for ensuring that minutes of Diversity Committee meetings are prepared and posted on the Diversity Committee’s SAA-hosted website to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping requirements.
V. Meetings
The committee meets once per year at the Annual Meeting and may also meet mid-year when appropriate. In addition, the committee may conduct its business by e-mail or telephone during the course of the year.
Approved by the SAA Council: 2003
Revised: August 2006, February 2010, May 2014
I. Purpose
The Finance Committee is responsible for assisting the Council in meeting its fiduciary responsibilities by: monitoring the financial health of the organization, ensuring that its assets are protected, and providing advice and counsel to the SAA Treasurer and the Council on financial matters, including the investment program.
II. Size, Composition, Selection, and Length of Terms
The Finance Committee consists of six members: the SAA Treasurer (who serves as chair), the Executive Director, the Finance/Administration Director, and three SAA members appointed by the Vice President in consultation with the current Finance Committee members to determine what expertise is needed as appointments are made. The three appointed members of the Committee serve for staggered three-year terms, so that one individual is appointed by the Vice President each year. The Vice President may appoint a seventh member (as needed or appropriate) an individual who is not an SAA member or archivist, but who has special expertise in one or more aspects of financial management.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Finance Committee reports to each full meeting of the Council, typically via the Treasurer's formal written report, and also reports to the Council on special initiatives as necessary or requested.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Review the Society's financial policies and make recommendations to the Council as appropriate. Review and monitor the Society's income and expenditures, annually review SAA dues and dues revenue to assure SAA's long-term financial stability, and report to the Council on SAA's financial needs and stability. Ensure preparation of accurate, timely, and meaningful financial statements. Meet (via conference call) with the independent auditor annually and review the Annual Audit Report. Review bids, interview, and recommend to the Executive Committee the selection of the external auditor every three years. Review and monitor the Society's investments portfolio and report to the Council on the growth and stability of the investments. Recommend changes to the investment strategy and the Investment Policy as appropriate. Review bids, interview, and recommend to the Executive Committee the selection of one or more investment consultants every three years.
V. Meetings
The Committee meets via conference call 1) after receipt of each quarterly report, in order to discuss the Society's financial standing; 2) prior to submission of a draft annual budget for Council review and adoption, in order to ensure that the draft budget is responsible and reasonable; 3) annually with the external auditor, in order to receive and discuss the Annual Audit Report; and 4) as needed with the investment consultant(s), in order to monitor investment performance.
Approved by the SAA Council: August 2009
Revised: May 2010
I. Purpose
Working closely with the SAA Executive Director and staff, the Host Committee serves as an advisory group to, and onsite extension of, the conference staff. Committee members provide their knowledge of the local area and its history and ideas for the non-program-related arrangements associated with the Annual Meeting.
The conference staff works with Committee members’ suggestions, the SAA Council-adopted budget, and the input of the SAA President and other leaders and staff to explore options and make final decisions and arrangements. Committee members also contribute promotional information (including articles, photographs, and online-only information about the host city) and serve on site as registration personnel.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The SAA Vice President / President-Elect appoints the chair and members of the Host Committee for the meeting over which he/she presides as president. The chair recommends members of the Host Committee from the geographic area in which the Annual Meeting is being held. The chair may wish to designate one or more co- or deputy chairs. The Host Committee is appointed one year or more before the Annual Meeting and serves through that meeting. Members of the Host Committee must be members of SAA, although non-SAA members may be asked to advise or assist the committee.
Host Committees generally establish subcommittees to facilitate their work. The number and responsibilities of these subcommittees is left up to the needs and wishes of each Host Committee.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Host Committee chair submits a report to the SAA Council (at the Annual Meeting or soon thereafter for online consideration) that addresses the extent to which Host Committee activities addressed diversity issues, evaluates the success of the Host Committee work process over the course of the year, and outlines issues encountered or to be addressed by future Host Committees. The Host Committee chair or co-chairs should be available to advise the incoming chair/co-chairs of the next year’s Committee to ensure transfer of knowledge.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Executive Director and conference staff are responsible for:
The Host Committee’s primary duties are the following:
A. Identify, research, and recommend:
B. Help promote the meeting and supply articles, images, and other written materials.
The Host Committee works closely with the SAA Executive Director and staff throughout the year prior to and during the Annual Meeting. Activities led by the Host Committee include but are not limited to:
C. Collect, compile, and use available communication mechanisms (social media, conference website, materials in the registration area) to present local information to potential Annual Meeting registrants. The Host Committee should develop and post actively on an Annual Meeting blog, which should include links to Annual Meeting information tracked and publicized by staff on the SAA website (such as repository tours and session information), as well as the following local information:
D. Coordinate and supply volunteers (both Host Committee members and other volunteers) for staffing of the “Advance Registration” desk during conference hours.
SAA is not able to waive registration fees for Host Committee members or other volunteers.
V. Meetings
The Host Committee meets as many times as is necessary before the Annual Meeting. SAA staff members attend some of these meetings. Meetings may be conducted in the host city, via conference call, or via alternative remote meeting technologies.
Approved by the SAA Council: September 1988
Revised: June 1992, December 2012
I. Purpose
The Membership Committee cooperates with the SAA Executive Director, staff, and the Council to provide advice and counsel on matters of membership recruitment and retention.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Membership Committee shall be composed of a chair, a vice chair/chair-elect, and six additional members to serve in staggered three-year terms. The chair of the Diversity Committee serves as an ex officio member. Standing subcommittees shall be appointed by the chair as needed and shall be chaired by a committee member.
The composition of the committee shall represent as broadly as possible all constituencies within the Society. The committee chair submits recommendations of prospective committee members to SAA's vice president/president-elect for consideration, as well as the name of a third-year committee member to serve as its next vice chair. The vice chair will serve a one-year term, followed by a one-year term as chair.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Membership Committee chair and vice chair must submit an annual report to the Council by December 31. The committee works closely with the SAA Executive Director and staff throughout the year as needed.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Membership Committee is responsible for the following:
V. Meetings
The Membership Committee meets at least once during the Annual Meeting and at other times, if necessary.
Approved by the SAA Council: January 1988
Revised: June 1992, June 1997, September 2004; December 2009
See also:
Membership Committee website
I. Purpose
The Mosaic Program Advisory Group provides ongoing support for the Association of Research Libraries/Society of American Archivists Mosaic Program, which provides financial support, practical work experience, mentoring, career placement assistance, and leadership development to individuals who are from traditionally underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups. The Mosaic Program work is funded by a three-year, $487,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
II. Task Force Selection, Size, and Length of Term
Following an open call for participation, the SAA Vice President/President-Elect will appoint five SAA members of varying levels of experience within the profession. One of those individuals will serve as the chair of the Advisory Group. Another of those individuals will serve as the chair of the Mosaic Program Selection Committee. All appointments are effective from July 1, 2013, to May 31, 2016
III. Reporting Procedures
The Advisory Group will submit periodic reports to the Project Director on a schedule that ensures that all IMLS grant reporting requirements are fulfilled.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Advisory Group members will contribute their time and perform all functions as extra-professional activities.
The Advisory Group will:
Establish the selection criteria for Mosaic Scholars, within the parameters outlined in the grant application.
Provide input on drafts of calls for applicants, marketing materials, and mentor training materials (e.g., webinars).
Work with the site coordinator from each partner institution to recruit on-site internship supervisors.
Work with the site coordinator from each partner institution to recruit on-site mentors.
In consultation with the SAA Executive Director, the SAA Program Coordinator, and the Project Director, develop the curriculum for the annual Mosaic Program Leadership Symposium to be held in conjunction with the SAA Annual Meeting.
Work with the Project Director and assigned staff to establish a “career placement service” that will, with the cooperation of mentors, develop programs and services to facilitate effective transitions into the professional workforce for all program participants.
Work with the Project Director and Program Coordinator to develop and monitor outcomes-based assessment of the program.
V. Meetings
The Advisory Group will accomplish its work primarily via email, conference call, and/or other electronic means and may meet in conjunction with the SAA Annual Meeting (although funding is not provided for a face-to-face meeting).
I. Purpose
The Mosaic Program Selection Committee is responsible for reviewing applications and selecting each cohort of Mosaic Scholars (five individuals in each of three years).
II. Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Selection Committee comprises five individuals. Following an open call for participation, the SAA Vice President/President-Elect will appoint to the Committee three SAA members of varying levels of experience within the profession. The Association of Research Libraries will appoint two individuals to the Committee. The chair of the Selection Committee will also serve as a member of the Mosaic Program Advisory Group. All appointments are effective from July 1, 2013, through May 31, 2016.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Selection Committee will submit periodic reports to the Mosaic Program Advisory Group and Project Director on a schedule that ensures that applicants receive prompt notification and all grant reporting requirements are fulfilled.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Selection Committee members will contribute their time and perform all functions as extra-professional activities.
The Selection Committee will:
Review the applications received in response to the call for applicants issued for each cohort (2013, 2014, and 2015) based on selection criteria established by the Mosaic Program Advisory Group within the parameters outlined in the grant application.
Provide timely reports of its decisions to ensure that all applicants receive prompt notification.
V. Meetings
The Selection Committee will accomplish its work via email, conference call, and/or other electronic means.
I. Purpose
In accordance with the SAA Bylaws, the Nominating Committee selects a slate of candidates to present for membership vote; provides information about the slate of candidates for the SAA Newsletter; drafts questions for inclusion in the candidates' statements; prepares a final report; and reports the election results at the annual business meeting.
II. Committee Selection, Size, Length of Terms
The Nominating Committee is composed of five members who serve for one year. Three members are elected each year by the membership from a slate submitted by the outgoing Nominating Committee and from any petition and write-in candidates submitted by the membership. Two of the three second-year Council members are selected by lot at the spring meeting of the Council to complete this committee. The vice president/president-elect appoints the chair of the Nominating Committee in the event of a tie for that office, according to the procedures in Bylaw 5.A.
The immediate past chair of the Nominating Committee shall serve on the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows for a one-year term.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The committee selects a slate of two candidates for each of the following offices: vice president/president-elect, three members of Council, and three Nominating Committee members. Two candidates for the office of Treasurer are chosen every third year.
Prior to the Annual Meeting, the chair obtains information from the SAA office and/or the SAA Archives regarding the preferential ballot, previous candidate slates, and election results. The Chair sends this information, along with copies of the Nominating Committee Guidelines and Information Sheets for Nominees to the other committee members. She/he also schedules committee meetings at the Annual Meeting, develops meeting agendas, and assigns responsibilities to committee members (e.g., to prepare lists of possible candidates or to contact various groups for suggestions).
The committee normally meets twice during the Annual Meeting. The first meeting, scheduled early in the week, should result in a slate of candidates for each office, a list of alternates, and a draft of the questions for the candidates' statements. (Because so much of the committee's work is completed during the Annual Meeting, if a Nominating Committee Open House is held, it should be scheduled early, perhaps prior to the first committee meeting, so that it can serve as an effective means for securing additional nominations.) The period between the two meetings of the committee is used by committee members to contact prospective candidates, inform them of the duties/ obligations of running for office, provide them with copies of the Information Sheet for Nominees, and secure commitments from as many of them as possible. The second meeting includes preparation of the final slate, the development of plans for contacting any candidates not yet committed, and approval of questions for candidates. A list of suggestions for nominations to be forwarded to the next year's committee also may be prepared at this meeting.
If alternate candidates must be approached after the Annual Meeting, the committee may reconvene by conference call. The final slate is circulated among the committee members for review, and the chair formally writes all candidates to confirm nomination prior to submitting the slate and list of candidates' questions to the Executive Director. The final slate is to be published in the SAA Newsletter. The SAA office handles the preparation and distribution of the ballot and arranges for the tabulation of election results by the Ballot Committee. The Executive Director informs each of the candidates of the results of the election.
The chair of the committee prepares a final report and submits it to the Council.
The chair reports the election results at the following annual business meeting.
IV. Criteria for Selection of Candidates
All candidates must be Individual members of SAA. Although no other formal criteria are listed for candidates, most committees strive for a balanced slate in terms of gender, geographical area, types and size of candidates repositories, and professional interests. The committee may wish to use past service on the Council as a requirement for selection of vice presidential candidates, and active participation in SAA as a requirement for candidates for the Council.
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1988.
Revised: May 2022.
I. Purpose
The Program Committee selects, oversees, and reports on the education sessions for the Annual Meeting for which it is established. It maintains liaison with the SAA President, appropriate SAA staff, and the Host Committee.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
III. Reporting Procedures
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
In reaching its decisions on these questions, the Program Committee will follow the Council-adopted "Principles and Priorities for Continuously Improving the SAA Annual Meeting" (August 2013) and the recommendations of the 2011-2013 Annual Meeting Task Force in its final report to the Council (May 2013).
Approved by the SAA Council: September 1988
Revised: August 2005, August 2013, November 2023,
I. Purpose
The Student Program Subcommittee reviews and selects graduate student paper proposals and oversees selection and/or judging of student posters for the annual meeting for which it is established. The Student Program Subcommittee is also charged with formulating applicable policy recommendations, as necessary, for the effective management of graduate student paper and poster sessions.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
III. Reporting Procedures
The Student Program Subcommittee reports to the Program Committee chair/co-chairs.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Approved by Council: January 2006
Revised: August 2008, January 2013
I. Purpose
The purpose of the Publications Board and Publications Editor is to ensure that the Society's non-serial publications serve the needs of its members. The Publications Board assists the Publications Editor by establishing overall policy direction, goals, and priorities for the non-serial publications program; approving manuscripts; and monitoring publications to ensure consistently high quality. The Publications Board also assists with the evaluation of the Publications Editor as requested by the Council.
II. Board Size, Length of Terms, and Selection
The Publications Board consists of the Publications Editor, who serves as chair of the board, and eight individual board members.
The Publications Editor's term of office, assuming satisfactory performance, is three years, with an option of reappointment for one additional three-year term.
The eight individual board members are appointed for four-year terms that are staggered so that one-fourth of the members are appointed each year. The Publications Editor recommends new members for appointment by the SAA Vice President. The Vice President bears ultimate responsibility for appointing board members to ensure that they represent diverse knowledge areas and constituencies within SAA. The Publications Editor's recommendations, however, bear considerable weight in this appointment process. An individual may serve no more than two consecutive terms.
The chair of The American Archivist Editorial Board will serve as an ex officio member of the Publications Board.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
A. Publications Editor
The role of the Publications Editor is to set a vision and provide philosophical and strategic direction for the program, acquire manuscripts, maintain a clear and transparent review process, direct the work of the Publications Board, cultivate partnerships with other professional associations, and seek external financial support (with the Council's permission) for specific projects.
The Publications Editor also serves as an ex officio member of The American Archivist Editorial Board.
B. Publications Board
The Publications Board assists the Publications Editor to:
C. SAA Office
The SAA office coordinates the physical production and mechanical aspects of the publishing program, including:
IV. Meetings
The Publications Board typically meets twice each year, once at the Annual Meeting and once at the midpoint of the fiscal year (provided funding is available). The Council liaison, Editor of American Archivist, Executive Director, Director of Publishing, and Production Manager participate in all meetings of the Publications Board.
V. Budget
The SAA Council, as part of its budget process, approves the publications program budget, which is prepared by the SAA office.
VI. Reporting and Performance Evaluation Procedures for Editor
The Publications Editor reports directly to the Council, and is required to submit written reports three times a year to the Council. The Council also may request that the Publications Editor attend and present a verbal report in conjunction with the Annual Meeting.
If the Council expresses concern about the performance of the Publications Editor, it will charge the Executive Director to gather information so that the Council can conduct a more detailed performance review. Such a performance review would include feedback from Publications Board members, the Director of Publishing, authors, and other individuals as appropriate.
In years in which the incumbent Publications Editor is eligible for reappointment, the Executive Director will contact the incumbent Publications Editor to determine if he or she is interested in serving a second term. If the Publications Editor expresses such an interest, the matter will be referred to the Council. After reviewing the Publications Editor's performance based on the position description and consulting such individuals as it deems appropriate, the Council will determine whether it wishes to offer the Publications Editor reappointment to a second term or will direct the Executive Director to implement a search for a new Publications Editor.
Approved by the Council September 29, 2006.
Revised by the Council: June 2012.
I. Purpose
The Standards Committee is responsible for initiating and facilitating the development of standards;* providing review and comment on standards that are relevant to archival theory and practice; educating the archives community about the value and role of standards; maintaining and updating the SAA Standards Portal; and partnering with related information management professional organizations on standards of mutual concern and interest.
* For the purposes of this document, the term "standards" includes standards, technical standards, conventions, rules, guidelines, and best practices. See Standards Development and Review for more information.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Standards Committee consists of nine appointed members (including two co-chairs) appointed by the SAA vice president / president-elect for staggered three-year terms. The Committee also shall include ex officio members, including chairs of all technical subcommittees and development and review teams that report to the Standards Committee, representatives of other SAA groups whose interests and activities closely interact with those of the Standards Committee, and members who serve as SAA's representatives to external organizations that deal with matters within the Committee's area of concern. Ex officio members shall include:
The SAA vice president / president-elect annually appoints three members based on recommendations from the Standards Committee co-chairs, whose terms begin at the end of the Annual Meeting. The co-chairs are appointed for staggered two-year terms, and are normally appointed based on the recommendation of the co-chairs by the vice president / president-elect from among the current and previous members of the Committee. Following the co-chair's two-year appointment, the co-chair shall become an ex officio member for one year.
Technical subcommittees. The Standards Committee may recommend that the SAA Council form (and disband) technical subcommittees. The SAA Council may charge a technical subcommittee to oversee SAA-developed standards. Technical subcommittees are responsible for the maintenance and review of the assigned standard (which requires that they monitor all feedback and calls for revision of the standard) and for promoting the standard and educating appropriate communities about it. Technical subcommittee chairs serve as regular or ex officio members of the Standards Committee.
With the recommendations of the Standards Committee co-chairs, the SAA vice president / president-elect appoints technical subcommittee chairs and members. Technical subcommittee members must have expertise related to the standard that they are responsible for maintaining. Technical subcommittees are ongoing as long as the adoped standard remains in use. Technical subcommittee chairs serve as regular or ex officio members of the Standards Committee.
Development and review teams. The Standards Committee may recommend that the SAA Council form (and disband) development and review teams to research and develop a specific standard, review a specific standard, study the need for a standard, or address a particular topic. Development and review teams are ad hoc and will be charged for an appropriate period of time as determined by the Council in consultation with the Standards Committee, not to exceed three years, and with the possibility of renewal.
With the recommendations of the Standards Committee co-chairs, the SAA vice president / president-elect appoints development and review team chairs and members. Development and review team members must have expertise related to the topic being addressed, and will most often be from the group that proposed the original project. Development and review team chairs serve as regular or ex officio members of the Standards Committee.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Standards Committee reports to the Council, providing a formal written report annually and reporting on special initiatives as necessary or requested. The co-chairs are responsible for coordinating the formulation and evaluation of the annual report and other planning documents as needed in consultation with Standards Committee members. The chair of each current technical subcommittee and development and review team is responsible for preparing and submitting an annual report of the group's activities to the Standards Committee co-chairs.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill its mission as described above, the Standards Committee is specifically charged to:
VI. Meetings
The Standards Committee meets once per year at the SAA annual meeting. Depending on operational need and contingent on SAA Council funding, the Committee or subgroups of it may meet midyear. Periodic conference call meetings may be scheduled as needed. Although regular meetings are open to any SAA member who wishes to attend, the Committee shall also hold public meetings as needed at the SAA annual meeting to report on the progress of ongoing standards development or to review projects and to receive questions and suggestions.
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1991 (for a period of three years); June 1992, extended to June 1995
Revised: June 1998, February 2010, January 2011, January 2012, August 2013, November 2018.
A primary responsibility of the Standards Committee is to oversee the process of initiating, developing, reviewing, and approving all standards developed by the Society of American Archivists through its subgroups, as well as reviewing standards submitted by external groups to SAA for its endorsement.
The Standards Committee works with groups on standards and standards-related projects from the initiation of the proposal, through development or review, to submission of the standard to the SAA Council for final approval.
For additional information about Standards Committee procedures:
The SAA Standards Committee defines a “standard” to be an industry agreement that establishes qualities or practices that make possible sharing of information, development of common vocabularies and practices, and more effective interaction among archivists, librarians, records managers, information managers, preservation administrators, historians, and other allied professionals. SAA standards must be approved by the SAA Council and they are maintained and periodically reviewed by professionals in the community.
Standards of many types are now central to archival practice. This document will generally use the term “standards” to refer to all of these types, including standards used in automated information systems, in preservation management, and in other technical areas, as well as standards and guidelines relating to professional practice.
Standards can take many forms:
The Standards Committee will not be concerned with the creation and maintenance of thesauri.
The Society of American Archivists recognizes the central importance of consensus to the development of standards. However, consensus on a specific standard may not always equate with unanimous and unqualified approval by all concerned, for in most cases this will be difficult to achieve.
The Standards Committee procedures for standards development within SAA mandate broad review of any proposed standard by all groups, both inside and outside of SAA, that have an interest in the standard. Important features of the review process are:
The Standards Committee is concerned both with the development of new standards and with the process of standards maintenance and review.
The best possible effort will be made to ensure that all reasonable opinions are considered in the development process and that most disputes are resolved before a document is deemed ready for the Council's consideration as an SAA standard.
Final adoption of a document as an SAA standard rests with the Council of the Society of American Archivists.
Once a standard is adopted, an ongoing technical subcommittee of the Standards Committee is assigned maintenance responsibilities to ensure that the document is promulgated widely, monitored in its application, and reviewed (and, if necessary, revised) on a regular schedule.
The Standards Committee has prepared detailed procedures for standards development and review.
SAA also plays an important role as a participant in work undertaken by other organizations that develop technical standards, such as the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and the Association for Information and Image Management (AIIM).
One of SAA’s core values is ensuring the diversity of its membership and leaders, the profession, and the archival record. We expect SAA-endorsed standards to reflect this commitment to a diverse and inclusive profession. Groups working on standards revisions or development are expected to articulate how the standard/revision addresses individual, institutional, or geographic diversity, or supports the development, inclusion, and stewardship of a diverse profession or cultural record.
The Standards Committee is ready to assist any SAA subgroup or outside organization to devise a strategy for developing a new standard or for reviewing and/or revising an existing document so that it can be considered for formal adoption as an SAA standard. Please contact the co-chairs of the Standards Committee for further information. [Member Roster]
Approved by SAA Council: June 1995
Revised: February 2010, January 2012, October 2023, June 2024
¹ The Standards Committee has modified the best practice definition from: A Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology. Retrieved May 26, 2009, from: http://www.archivists.org/glossary/term_details.asp?DefinitionKey=1770
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
SAAStandardsWorkflow_20231012.pdf | 71.38 KB |
Standards Committee_ Standard Creation_Revision_Outline_20231012.docx.pdf | 70.16 KB |
SAA Standards Process Flow Chart.pdf | 29.21 KB |
Standard Creation_Revision_Outline_v3_20240625.pdf | 76.05 KB |
Proposals must be submitted by official groups within the SAA (including committees, technical subcommittees, boards, sections, task forces, and working groups). Individuals interested in the development of a standard may consult with the Standards Committee about groups that are appropriate for submission of a standards proposal.
Complete and submit the Proposal for Standards Development form. The form requires the following information:
I.B.1. Acknowledge receipt of the proposal to the individuals who submitted it and notify the Standards Committee of the proposal submission.
I.B.2. Distribute copies of the proposal to the other members of the Standards Committee, including the subgroup chairs and the SAA Council liaison. Subgroup chairs may distribute the proposal to their technical subcommittee or development and review team for comment.
I.B.3. Collect comments and suggestions from members of the Standards Committee and other subgroups to which the proposal was distributed.
I.B.4. If comments warrant further discussion, arrange for communications to determine if there is a consensus to endorse the proposal.
The Standards Committee will take a formal vote in response to the proposal, and will take one of the following actions in response to a proposal, as appropriate:
The Standards Committee will return to the proposing group a proposal that is incomplete or that requires revision and request that it be revised and resubmitted.
Reasons for returning the proposal may include, but are not limited to:
This process ideally occurs no more than once, but may occur more than once if needed.
The Standards Committee may decline to recommend undertaking a standards project because:
The Standards Committee will forward all declined proposals to the SAA Council along with the reason why the Standards Committee does not recommend the proposal. The proposing group may file an appeal with the SAA Council within 60 days of notification by the Committee.
If the Standards Committee is satisfied with the proposal, it will be submitted with a recommendation by the Committee to the Council for final approval. The Standards Committee will send the Standard Proposal Form and any accompanying correspondence or other documentation to the SAA Council for approval to undertake the project.
For standards already maintained by an existing technical subcommittee or other appointed group, the Standards Committee co-chairs will prepare a draft charge based on the revision proposal and review it with the appointed group’s co-chairs. Upon finalizing that plan, the appointed group shall proceed with its work.
For standards without an existing technical subcommittee or other group, the Standards Committee co-chairs will prepare a draft charge for the development and review team and make recommendations for its membership. In most cases, the members of the proposing group will be included in the recommendation for membership of the development and review team. The charge must then be approved by the SAA Council before the SAA vice president / president-elect appoints the chair(s) and members of the development and review team. Once the standard is adopted, the team will be disbanded by the SAA Council and the Council will either assign the standard to an existing component group or create a technical subcommittee to maintain and review the adopted standard (see V.C.I.).
The Standards Committee co-chairs will notify the co-chairs of the proposing group(s) of the approval of the project. Subsequently, the co-chairs of the group(s) responsible for developing the standard will publish a “Notice of Intention to Initiate a Standards Development Project” via all appropriate SAA communication channels. This step is taken to notify the membership that a project will soon be under way and to solicit comments and participation from interested parties. Any comments will be sent to both the Standards Committee co-chairs and the co-chairs of the proposing group. Official project approval will be granted automatically 30 days after publication of the "Notice" unless the comments received by the Standards Committee co-chairs are such that the proposal warrants reconsideration, in which case the Committee will refer the proposal and comments back to the proposing group for review and response.
In the course of developing a new standard, development and review teams shall complete the following actions:
The development and review team will engage in extensive consultation with interested parties inside and outside of SAA that are essential to the development of standards, and must submit to the Standards Committee evidence that such consultation has taken place. The development and review team must address all written comments sent to the group and all comments made at an SAA open meeting. The Standards Committee will assist the development and review team in publicizing the project and identifying consultants.
Consultation should be pursued through several means, such as:
Once it has completed the consultation process and prepared the final draft of the standard, the development and review team will compile a package to forward to the Standards Committee for its review. This package will include:
III.B.1. Full text of the proposed standard.
III.B.2. Introductory narrative.
This section, which should not exceed 1,000 words, must include the scope of application, in particular:
The development and review team must submit documentation that the consultation process has taken place and that a reasonable agreement has been reached on the contents and intent of the proposed standard. This evidence may take the form of:
The development and review team must recommend a plan for maintenance and review of the standard it has developed. Standards developed by SAA will be assigned to a component group, such as a technical subcommittee, for necessary maintenance and review. Each will be either assigned to a review cycle of no more than 5 years, or approved for ongoing review. At the end of a set review cycle, the SAA Council will be asked by the Standards Committee to reaffirm, revise, or rescind the standard. The "Maintenance and Review Plan" will suggest the appropriate subgroup for assignment and type of review process. (See V.C. - V.E.)
The package should be prepared in and sent to the Standards Committee in PDF format attached to an email to the co-chairs, or by another method deemed acceptable by all parties.
In the event that the development and review team fails to reach general agreement on a draft standard or, for whatever reason, chooses to discontinue its work on the proposed standard, it shall notify the Standards Committee that it has abandoned the project. The Standards Committee shall publish a notice in appropriate SAA media that the project has been discontinued.
Upon receiving the final draft package from the development and review team, the Standards Committee will take the following actions:
The Standards Committee will review the package to ensure that it is complete and that adequate consultation and review have taken place. It may return the package to the development and review team if significant elements (as enumerated in III.B) are missing for revisions. Reasons for returning the package may include, but are not limited to:
This process ideally occurs no more than once, but may occur more than once if needed.
IV.B.1. Publication of revised draft standard.
Based on the substance of the revisions, the potential breadth of impact, and any apparent remaining substantive conflicts on content, the Standards Committee may determine that the entire revised text should be published via an appropriate medium in order to ensure the broadest possible participation in and awareness of the standards development process. The Standards Committee will accept written comments on the revised draft addressed to the Standards Committee co-chairs within 30 days of publication of the revised draft or notice of the availability of the revised draft.
If additional comments received after publication of the revision indicate widespread disagreement about the revised draft within the SAA membership, the Committee may determine that the draft should be referred back to the development and review team for response. Substantive changes to the draft standard as a result of these additional comments may require publication of a new "Notice of Completion" and notification or publication of a new revised draft.
The Standards Committee may determine that issues raised in the additional comments were already addressed adequately during the development and consultation process. The Standards Committee will then publish the notice of completion and forward the package to the SAA Council.
IV B.2. Notice of project completion.
When the final draft package is deemed complete, the Standards Committee will work with SAA staff to publish a notice in the appropriate SAA communication channels announcing that the standards development project has been completed and the draft standard has been forwarded to the Council. (See IV.C.)
At the conclusion of the development process, the Standards Committee will send to the SAA Council a report on the process and a recommendation.
IV.C.1. Recommendation to consider adoption.
When the Standards Committee is satisfied that the development and consultation process has been completed satisfactorily it will, after publication of the notice, forward the package to the SAA Council with a recommendation that the Council consider adopting the draft document as an official standard of the Society of American Archivists.
IV.C.2. Report on "irreconcilable differences."
After reviewing all documentation, the Standards Committee may determine that disagreements raised represent substantive irreconcilable differences of views or professional positions. In this situation, the Standards Committee will forward the package to the SAA Council with an explanation of the remaining problems and, depending on the type of standard and breadth of impact, may or may not recommend that the Council consider adopting the draft as an official standard of the Society of American Archivists.
The Standards Committee shall ensure that the following actions are taken for each standard that is formally adopted by the SAA Council. Often the group that developed the standard will be actively involved in or have primary responsibility for these activities.
V.A.1. Full text in the SAA newsletter.
The preferred method of publication will be to publish the full text of the adopted standard in the Society’s newsletter and on the SAA website.
V.A.2. Notice of availability in newsletter.
Some standards may be too long to publish in the newsletter. For these, a notice of their approval and a summary of their contents will be published in the next SAA newsletter and/or on the SAA website, along with information about how to obtain a copy from the SAA website.
V.A.3. Added to Standards Portal webpage.
SAA staff will post all formally adopted standards on the Standards Portal webpage with the following information: 1) the name of the standard, 2) a description of the standard, 3) a link to the full text of the standard or a description of where the standard can be obtained, 4) the date on which the standard was adopted, 5) next review date of the standard, 6) information about how comments and feedback for revision can be submitted, and 7) any additional supporting documents or information.
V.B.1. Notice to heads of allied professional organizations.
The SAA president and/or executive director will send a letter and copy of the adopted standard to all interested outside organizations to notify them of SAA's action. The Standards Committee will assist the group that developed the standard in drafting the letter and identifying which groups to contact.
V.B.2. Press release to editors of professional journals and newsletters.
The executive director will, in cooperation with the Standards Committee and development and review team, ensure that a press release is distributed to editors of allied professional journals and newsletters to announce the development and approval of the standard, providing its full text when possible.
V.B.3. Other publicity.
For standards of interest beyond professional circles, the executive director, Standards Committee, and development and review team will determine how best to publicize their approval. Working in concert with the Program and Education committees and the SAA staff, the Standards Committee will assist the subgroup in developing workshops, conference sessions, or public forums on the new standard.
Immediately upon adoption of an SAA standard, the following actions shall occur:
V.C.1. Component group responsible for maintenance and review assigned.
As part of the approval process, the SAA Council will assign the standard to an ongoing SAA component group for maintenance and review or create a technical subcommittee. If a new technical subcommittee is to be created, the Standards Committee co-chairs will prepare a draft charge for the subcommittee and make recommendations for its membership. In most cases, the members of the development and review team who were actively involved in the development of the standards will be included in the recommendation for membership of the technical subcommittee. The charge must then be approved by the SAA Council before the vice president / president-elect appoints the chair(s) and members of the subcommittee.
V.C.2. Review cycle set.
All adopted SAA standards will be either assigned a review cycle of no more than five years, with a formal review commencing no later than three years following adoption or reaffirmation (section V.D.), or approved for ongoing review (section V.E.). However, in both situations, comments and revisions to the standard and proposals to revise adopted standards may be submitted at any time. At the end of an assigned review cycle, the SAA Council will be asked to reaffirm, agree to revise, or rescind the standard.
V.C.3. Monitoring and promulgating use begins.
The maintaining component group will be responsible for promoting the proper and effective use of the standard and will regularly obtain comments and feedback on the standard for future review and revision.
At least two years before the review cycle expires, the Standards Committee will notify the maintaining component group that it should initiate a formal review of the content and use of the standard. The following actions shall be taken:
V.D.1. Review plan prepared.
In consultation with the Standards Committee, the component group will prepare a plan that will ensure consensus using the same kinds of broadly based consultation and review that occurred when the standard was originally developed. The plan may include:
V.D.2. Standards Committee and SAA Council review plan.
The component group will submit the plan to the Standards Committee, at which point the Standards Committee will decide whether the review process is adequate. If significant financial resources are required for review, the Standards Committee will forward the plan to the SAA Council with a recommendation for funding.
V.D.3. Recommendation to revise, reaffirm, or rescind the standard.
Once the review plan has been approved, the technical subcommittee will commence the formal review. When adequate consultation has taken place, the technical subcommittee will recommend one of the following:
Once the review plan has been approved, the component group will commence the formal review. When adequate consultation has taken place, the technical subcommittee will recommend one of the following:
V.D.4. Recommendation to the SAA Council
The maintaining component group will submit a package to the Standards Committee containing its recommendation to reaffirm, revise, or rescind the standard along with documentation about the review process (as in III.). If the component group recommends revision, the group will also submit a completed proposal form (as in I.A.2.).
V.D.5. The Standards Committee will review the package to ensure that the review plan was adequate. Assuming that no procedural questions remain unresolved, it will forward the package to the Council with the recommendation to reaffirm, revise, or rescind.
V.D.6. The SAA Council votes on whether to reaffirm, revise, or rescind the standard.
If the Council votes to revise the standard, the component group will continue the revision work. Once the revision has been completed, the component group will follow the same process for submission and approval of a new standard, as outlined in sections III.B. and later.
If the Council reaffirms the standard, a new review cycle will be set, which may be shorter than five years. A new component group may be appointed, if necessary. The component group and the Standards Committee will inform all relevant parties that the standard has been reaffirmed and does not require revision at this time.
Should the Council vote to rescind the standard, the component group and the Standards Committee will inform all relevant parties that the standard has been rescinded. The Standards Committee will then either remove the standard from the standards webpage or mark the standard as "rescinded."
V.D.7. Notice and publication of reaffirmed, revised, or rescinded standards.
An information dissemination process similar to that outlined under V.A. and V.B. for new standards will be followed to ensure broad awareness of SAA actions concerning reaffirmed, revised, and rescinded standards.
Proposed revisions to a standard approved for ongoing review are reviewed and addressed as they are received by the assigned component group. Ongoing review is particularly conducive to standards that are electronically published and thus easy to update. Major or minor proposed changes can be submitted at any time.
In order to respond adequately and in a timely manner to proposals for change, the following actions should be taken:
V.E.1. Proposal for changes received.
Proposals may be submitted by SAA component groups (i.e., sections, committees, task forces, or working groups), by interested external organizations (e.g., the Rare Books and Manuscripts Section), or by individuals, or may be generated by the technical subcommittee itself. Proposals should include the following elements:
All proposals should be submitted to the component group responsible for the maintenance of the standard.
V.E.2. Component group reviews proposals.
Upon receiving a proposal, the component group responsible shall:
Conduct a preliminary review of the proposed change request to ensure that it is complete. Incomplete proposals will be returned to the submitting body. If there are no missing elements to the documentation, the component group will acknowledge receipt to the proposer.
Evaluate if the proposed change should be considered a major or minor change.[1]
[1] These definitions were inspired by Semantic Versioning, but do not completely align with the versioning guidelines put forth by it.
[2] In this context, a major change is a single significant change to the standard. This is distinct from a major revision, which is a revision to the standard as a whole or several major changes. Major revision requires utilizing the cyclical revision procedures (see V.E.7 for major revisions to continuous revision standards).
V.E.3. Consultation with other SAA subgroups and external organizations.
For proposals classified as major changes, external groups, particularly those directly impacted by a proposal, must be consulted during the review process. This should include informing the Standards Committee co-chairs of the proposal submission. Consultation should be pursued through several means, which may include:
For proposals classified as minor changes, consultation with external groups is optional.
V.E.4. Recommendation to revise the standard.
Based on comments received from the community, the component group may either reject the proposal, or develop a recommendation for changes to the standard. The draft changes may be based on both the original proposal and amendments developed during the review process. Change proposals should document changes in the standard in relation to the current text. Significant changes in the initial proposal by the component group may require an additional period of consultation. The review and consultation process should be completed within six months of the submission of a proposal.
For major changes, once the draft changes have been finalized, the proposal packet should be forwarded to the Standards Committee together with documentation of the submission and consultation process. For minor changes, complete and submit to the Standards Committee the Minor Changes Form.
V.E.5. Standards Committee review of recommended changes.
For proposals submitted as major changes, the Standards Committee will review the package to ensure that it is complete and that adequate consultation and review have taken place. It may return the package to the component group if significant elements are missing.
For proposals submitted as minor changes, the Standards Committee will review the package to ensure it is complete and meets the qualifications for a minor change. It may return the package to the component group if significant elements are missing or if it identifies the change as constituting a major change, in which case the component group must follow procedures for revising a major change.
The SAA Council authorizes the Standards Committee to accept minor changes to official standards of the Society of American Archivists. Decisions must be reported in a timely manner to the SAA Council, which reserves the right to roll back the change.
V.E.6. Recommendation to the SAA Council.
For proposed major changes, the Standards Committee will send to the SAA Council a report on the process and a recommendation. This may be either a recommendation to consider implementation of the draft changes, or a recommendation against adoption. The decision to accept changes to official standards of the Society of American Archivists can only be made by the SAA Council.
When the draft changes documentation is deemed complete, the Standards Committee will publish a notice in the appropriate SAA media announcing that the draft changes have been forwarded to the Council.
V.E.6. Promulgation of revised standard.
If a major draft change is accepted by the SAA Council, or a minor change is accepted by the Standards Committee, the Standards Committee will publish a notice of the approval of the changes in the appropriate SAA media.
V.E.7. Major revisions or rescinding the standard.
In addition to managing proposals for revision, the component group may also determine that the standard is no longer relevant or has been superseded, and may recommend that the standard be considered for major revisions or rescinded. The guidelines for cyclical review should be followed in developing such recommendations (see section V.D.). The SAA Council may also establish a deadline for reviewing the applicability and maintenance of standards at their discretion.
In some cases the SAA Council may initiate, or encourage/approve a component group to initiate, the standards development process for best practices documents without seeking prior approval from the Standards Committee. In these cases a subgroup of the Council functions as the standard development and review team and the standards approval process begins at step III as described above.
SAA Expert Groups (as identified by the Council) may also create best practice and/or guidelines that support the mission of the Society and its members. In these cases the Expert Group functions as the standards development and review team and the standards approval process begins at Step III. The Expert Group will notify the Standards Committee co-chairs when they begin a revision process.
Revised June 1995, February 2010, January 2012, August 2013, May 2014, July 2016, January 2021, June 2024.
This outline is designed to help Society of American Archivists (SAA) sections or groups who are sponsoring the creation of a new standard or the revision of an existing standard. This is not a substitute for the Procedures for Review and Approval of an SAA-Developed Standard, but it is designed to help navigate the process. References to the Procedures are included throughout the list, for more detailed information with the section and subsection number (ex: I.A. or III.C.1)
Please note: This outline is not for the Procedures for SAA Endorsement of an External Standard. That is a different (and slightly shorter) process designed for SAA approval of standards created or revised by external groups, task forces with representation from multiple organizations, or other non-SAA developed documentation.
1. The proposing group(s) (which must be an official SAA group) must complete the proposal for standards development (I.A.)
a. Note: Occasionally, creation or revision may begin with a different workflow, under the auspices of SAA Council. “Fast-tracked procedures” (VI) may be initiated by Council, but are still subject to review by Standards Committee, beginning with Section III of the Procedures and should follow the outline below starting at step 3.
2. Standards Committee reviews the proposal and may be in communication with the proposing group(s) for additional details (II.A)
3. Standards Committee recommends for Council to approve creation/revision process and forwards it to Council according to their meeting schedule/deadline for agenda items.
4. Once Council has agreed that a proposal is approved for creation/revision, the Standards Development Process (III) begins. The group appointed to do the creation/revision will:
a. Consult with SAA groups and external organizations (III.A). This process should be documented for the submission packet later.
b. Draft the new or revised standard and supporting documentation (III.B) OR submit a notice of project abandonment (III.C).
c. Submit the packet (draft and supporting documentation) to Standards.
5. Standards Committee reviews the submission packet and may be in communication with the group leading the creation/revision for additional details or information (IV.A).
6. Once the packet is complete, Standards Committee will make a recommendation and forward it to Council according to their meeting schedule/deadline for agenda items.
7. Once the packet has been recommended to Council for approval of the creation/revision and Council has agreed, the group leading the creation/revision:
a. Will work with the Standards Committee and SAA Webmaster to add or update the standard on the Standards Portal (V.A.3).
b. Will assist in developing information to release through different channels to share the new or revised standard (V.B)
c. May participate in managing the revision cycle or ongoing maintenance (depending on how the standard is managed) (V.C.2). Details on cyclical review (V.D) and on-going review (V.E.) are part of the procedures.
8. Celebrate your success!
Continuous Revision Note
Some standards are on a continuous revision cycle and major and minor changes may be proposed at any time without a full revision proposal.
1. Technical subcommittees responsible for standards under continuous revision may submit a minor change to the Standards Committee as per Section V.E.2 using the minor change request form. Minor changes are approved by the Standards Committee and submitted to Council for notification at the end of each year, as part of the annual report.
2. The technical subcommittees responsible for standards under continuous revision may submit a major change to one or more parts of the standard following the guidance in Section V.D.
V.2 reviewed and approved by the Standards Committee, October 2023
Proposals must be submitted by official groups within the SAA. Individuals who are interested in submitting a proposal for the endorsement of an external standard may consult with the Standards Committee on appropriate groups to which they may wish to submit a proposal.
I.A. The proposing group shall:
Complete and submit the PROPOSAL FOR ENDORSEMENT OF AN EXTERNAL STANDARD form. The form shall include:
I.B. The Standards Committee co-chairs shall:
I.B.1. Acknowledge receipt of the ENDORSEMENT PROPOSAL FORM to the proposing body and notify the Standards Committee of the proposal submission.
I.B.2. Distribute copies of the ENDORSEMENT PROPOSAL FORM to the other members of the Standards Committee, including the subgroup chairs and the SAA Council liaison. Subgroup chairs may distribute the proposal to their technical subcommittee or development and review team for comment.
I.B.3. Collect comments and suggestions from members of the Standards Committee and other subgroups to which the proposal was distributed.
I.B.4. If comments warrant further discussion, arrange for a discussion to determine whether there is a consensus to endorse the standard.
The Standards Committee will take a formal vote in response to the proposal, and will take one of the following actions in response to a proposal, as appropriate:
II.A. Return for revision.
The Standards Committee will return to the submitting group a proposal form that is incomplete or that requires revision and request that it be revised and resubmitted.
II.B. Decline.
The Standards Committee may decline the endorsement of an external standard because: 1) the external standard is in direct conflict with an SAA-adopted standard or policy; 2) there is insufficient demand or potential benefit to SAA members; 3) the standard is not widely adopted or used in the archives field; or 4) the review process does not allow for SAA contribution or comment.
II.C. Endorse.
If the Standards Committee agrees that the external standard has benefit to the SAA community, it will recommend the standard to the SAA Council for endorsement. If the SAA Council endorses the standard, the Standards Committee will then take the following actions:
Adopted by the SAA Council: February 2010, January 2012
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee on Archival Facilities Guidelines (TS-AFG) of the SAA Standards Committee oversees the ongoing maintenance and development of Archives and Special Collections Facilities: Guidelines for Archivists, Librarians, Architects, and Engineers (“Facilities standard”), a standard adopted by SAA. The Technical Subcommittee also investigates the feasibility of expansion of the Facilities standard to a national standard and/or a multi-organizational standard.
II. Subcommittee Selection, Size, and Length of Term:
TS-AFG shall be charged for five years, beginning August 2010, or until revisions to the Facilities standard are completed as described in the Procedures for Review and Approval of an SAA-Developed Standard. [TS-AFG's original length of term was extended to August 2016 by the SAA Executive Committee on July 27, 2015. The term was further extended to August 2018 by the SAA Council in November 2016. The term was further extended to August 2020 by the SAA Council in February 2019. The term was further extended to August 2022 by the SAA Council in November 2020. The term was extended to July 2024 by the SAA Council in November 2023] After revision work is completed, if the Facilities standard continues to be an approved standard of SAA, the TS-AFG shall be re-charged for a subsequent review cycle.
The members and chair(s) of the TS-AFG shall be appointed for the length of time necessary to complete revisions to the Facilities standard, which shall not exceed five years.
The Technical Subcommittee shall be composed of five to nine individuals, including the chair(s), to be recommended by the Standards Committee for appointment by the Vice President. The chair(s) and at least four other member of the Subcommittee shall be a member of SAA with demonstrated experience in archival facility issues. However, the Technical Subcommittee may include one to three members from other professions who have significant knowledge of and experience with archival facilities.
Ex officio members of the TS-AFG shall include the following:
III. Reporting Procedures:
The chair(s) of the TS-AFG shall report at least annually to the chair(s) of the SAA Standards Committee at the SAA Annual Meeting. If extramural funding is obtained by the SAA, the chair(s) shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that reporting requirements of SAA and funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities:
To fulfill its mission as described above, the TS-AFG is specifically charged to:
V. Meetings:
The TS-AFG shall carry out its charges primarily via electronic mail, regular mail, and conference calls. It may meet at the SAA Annual Meeting and as necessary provided that SAA Council-approved funding is available.
Revised by the SAA Council: January 2011; December 2013; July 2015; November 2016; February 2019; November 2020; November 2023.
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee for Describing Archives: A Content Standard (TS-DACS) of the SAA Standards Committee is responsible for overseeing the timely and ongoing intellectual and technical maintenance and development of Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS). DACS is an output-neutral set of rules for describing archives, personal papers, and manuscript collections, and can be applied to all material types. DACS is compatible with ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description, 2nd ed. (International Council on Archives, 1999) and ISAAR(CPF): International Standard Archival Authority Records for Corporate Bodies, Persons and Families, 2nd ed. (International Council on Archives, 2003). DACS is an SAA-approved standard; documentation for DACS is available through the Society of American Archivists at http://www.archivists.org/governance/standards/dacs.asp .
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The technical subcommittee shall be composed of ten regular members and two co-chairs. All members shall be appointed by the SAA Vice President/President-Elect for staggered three-year terms so that a minimum of two individuals are appointed by the Vice President each year. All members must demonstrate significant knowledge of and experience with archival description generally, and with DACS specifically.
All members of TS-DACS shall be recommended by the Standards Committee for appointment by the SAA Vice President. The chair(s) will be selected from existing TSDACS membership and appointed for a three year term. The chair(s) and members of TS-DACS may be reappointed for one consecutive term.
Ex officio members of the Technical Subcommittee on DACS shall include the following if they are not regular members of the subcommittee:
III. Reporting Procedures
The chair(s) of the Technical Subcommittee on DACS shall report at least annually to the chair(s) of the SAA Standards Committee on the occasion of the SAA Annual Meeting. If extramural funding is obtained by SAA, the chair(s) shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that the reporting requirements of SAA and the funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill this mission, TS-DACS is specifically charged to:
TS-DACS shall work within the guidelines for ongoing review of an SAA-adopted standard, and may develop more detailed procedures for meeting those requirements.
VI. Meetings
TS-DACS shall carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, regular mail, and conference calls. It shall meet at the SAA Annual Meeting and as necessary, provided that SAA Council-approved funding is available.
Approved by the SAA Council: February 2010
Revised: January 2011; August 2013; February 2017; March 2024;
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee for Encoded Archival Standards (TS-EAS) is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of EAD and EAC-CPF, including all schemas and related code, as well as the development of future companion standards, such as the proposed Encoded Archival Context for Functions. Its membership will be sufficient to encompass the necessary domain expertise for each standard and schema development, and will include broad international representation including SAA members and other professionals from the international archival community. The members of the committee will foster the thoughtful evolution of archival encoding standards on behalf of and in consultation with the global archival community and in close collaboration with the International Council on Archives Experts Group on Archival Description.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The technical subcommittee shall be composed of between fifteen and twenty-five members (excluding two co-chairs) appointed by the SAA Vice President / President-Elect for staggered three-year terms so that a minimum of three individuals are appointed by the Vice President each year. The committee will reflect the international nature of the standards it develops, and will include balanced representation from its user communities. A majority of the committee members will be members of SAA unless sufficient expertise is not available within the SAA membership, in which case the composition of the committee may be adjusted at the discretion of the Council. All members shall demonstrate significant knowledge of and experience with archival schemas generally, and with EAD and EAC-CPF specifically. The chairs and members of TS-EAS may be reappointed.
The Technical Subcommittee for Encoded Archival Standards co-chairs will be appointed by the SAA Vice President / President-Elect, and serve as the primary contact between TS-EAS, SAA, the Standards Committee, and other related organizations. At least one co-chair will be a member of SAA.
Ex officio members of TS-EAS shall include the following if they are not regular members of the subcommittee:
III. Reporting Procedures
The co-chairs of TS-EAS shall report at least annually to the chairs of the SAA Standards Committee. They will coordinate meeting logistics at the SAA annual meeting and elsewhere, establish TS-EAS priorities and agendas, work with related SAA section leaders, and oversee and support the work of various TS-EAS standard leads. If extramural funding is obtained by SAA, the co-chairs shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that the reporting requirements of SAA and the funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Within TS-EAS, a member will be designated by the co-chairs as the lead for each standard being maintained or developed. Each standard lead will be responsible, with the support of the co-chairs, for soliciting and compiling comments, logging bugs, leading discussion of proposed changes, articulating and justifying changes to the international community, and coordinating as necessary with other standard leads. There will also be a lead for schema design who will be responsible, with the support of the co-chairs, for coordinating work on schemas and related code and maintaining appropriate GitHub repositories. The TS-EAS co-chairs will also designate a committee member to serve as a secretary, responsible for taking and distributing meeting minutes.
Additional ad hoc subgroups within TS-EAS may be formed to address specific issues on a project basis (e.g., a tag library editorial team).
VI. Meetings
TS-EAS shall carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, regular mail, and on-line meetings. To ensure the inclusion of all members, TS-EAS shall meet in a hybrid setting at the SAA annual meeting and as necessary with funding from SAA or from extramural sources (with prior approval by the SAA Council).
Approved by the SAA Council: November 2015, Revised May 2023
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee on Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning (TS-GRD) of the SAA Standards Committee is responsible for overseeing the timely and ongoing maintenance, review, promotion, outreach, and education-related to the and development of Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning. These guidelines provide resources, recommended procedures, and other information for archivists who may be involved in reviewing their institutional holdings. Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning is an SAA-approved standard and is available via the SAA Standards Portal (http://www2.archivists.org/standards/).
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The TS-GRD was charged for five years, beginning August 2012, to develop the standard, with the charge expiring at the SAA Annual Meeting of the fifth year. The Guidelines continue to be an approved standard of SAA. In May 2017, the Council extended the technical subcommittee for another 5-year review cycle, to be completed by August 2022. In 2022, the Council approved an extension of the second review cycle to August 2025.
The technical subcommittee shall be composed of five to eight individuals, including the Chair and Vice-chair, to be recommended by the Standards Committee for appointment by the Vice President. The Chair of the second review cycle will serve until August 2023. A Vice Chair will be appointed for a three-year term beginning August 2022: the first year as Vice Chair, and the second and third years as Chair. All members shall demonstrate significant knowledge of and experience with archival appraisal, reappraisal, reprocessing, and/or deaccessioning. Members and chairs may be reappointed to the TS-GRD for two consecutive review cycles, but at least two new SAA members must be appointed per review cycle.
Ex officio members of the Technical Subcommittee for Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning shall include the following if they are not regular members of the Subcommittee:
III. Reporting Procedures
The chair(s) of the TS-GRD shall report at least annually to the chair(s) of the SAA Standards Committee on the occasion of the SAA Annual Meeting. If extramural funding is obtained by SAA, the chair (or co-chairs) shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that the reporting requirements of SAA and the funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill this mission, the TS-GRD is specifically charged to:
VI. Meetings
The TS-GRD shall carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, and conference calls. It shall meet at the SAA Annual Meeting and as necessary with funding from SAA or from extramural sources (with prior approval by the SAA Council.
Adopted by the SAA Council: May 23, 2012. Revised: May 2017. June 2023.
A. Purpose
Adopted by Council: June 1991
Revised: June 1992, August 2007, July 2013, November 2014
I. Purpose
The Archival Worker Labor Task Force is responsible for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing archival worker labor (including students and interns) issues that SAA can impact for the purpose of building long-term structural support among archival workers, SAA, and other organizations for secure and equitable labor conditions for all archival workers.
II. Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Task Force is charged for a three-year period beginning in August 2023, with a final report with recommendations due to the Council no later than September 2026. The Task Force will consist of nine members (one of whom will serve as chair). Of these members, one will be appointed from among the SAA Foundation Class B board members, one will be a non-member, and one will be a former member of the Task Force on Archival Compensation.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Task Force will prepare an interim status report for the Council’s Fall 2024 & 2025 meetings and a final written report with recommendations for the Council’s Summer 2026 meeting.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill its purpose as described above, the Task Force is charged with:
Identifying what labor issues SAA should assist with;
Identifying funding sources, including SAA’s relationship with the SAA Foundation;
Determining risks associated with SAA responses and funding;
Determining the most effective mechanisms for managing and distributing resources (including educational ones) and collaborating with other actors; and
Assessing the impact on SAA staff.
Investigating compensation for volunteer work done for SAA.
The Task Force should investigate these issues, identify actions SAA should take and prioritize them, and report back to the SAA Council. The Task Force should seek assistance from non-member experts as needed.
V. Meetings
The Task Force shall meet virtually as needed to conduct its work. The Task Force may conduct its business by email, telephone, or virtual meeting during the year.
Approved by the SAA Council in May 2023.
I. Purpose
The
Membership Funding and Pathways for Diverse Archives Workers Task Force will
·
By December 2024 (FY25), draft a plan for ongoing
funding to support memberships and annual meeting attendance scholarships for
diverse archives workers, including retention and engagement (phase 1)
and
·
By July 2025, make recommendations to the Council on
a plan, program, or track focused on building accessible leadership pathways
for diverse archives workers (phase 2).
The
plan and recommendation will consider the Society’s Strategic Plan 2023-2025
and the DEIA Work Plan and be informed by existing goals and strategies
developed by SAA component groups – specifically the Diversity Committee, the
Membership Committee, and the SAA Foundation.
The
plan and recommendations will be focused in their approach to secure funding
and provide clear and accessible membership and leadership pathways for diverse
archives workers. They will outline ways to reduce barriers to participation in
the Society – specifically through funding memberships and annual meeting
attendance costs for diverse archives workers.
The
plan and recommendations will be first implemented in FY25, with the goal of
the first round of membership and annual meeting funding being distributed
during that fiscal year. A second phase–focused on accessible leadership
pathways for diverse archives workers– is to be implemented subsequently.
II. Task Force Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The
task force will consist of eight members who will be appointed by the SAA Vice
President/President-Elect. The chair will be selected by the task force from
among the current task force members. The Task Force members’ terms will end in
August 2027.
Representatives
from the component groups and sections shall serve on the Task Force are listed
below:
Awards
Committee, chair or designee
Diversity Committee, chair or designee
Membership Committee, chair or designee
Treasurer, chair or designee
SAA Foundation Development Committee, chair or designee
Accessibility and Disability Section, chair or designee
Diverse Sexuality and Gender Section, chair or designee
Native American Archives Section,
III. Duties and Responsibilities
·
By December 2024, draft a plan and approach for funding
memberships and annual meeting attendance scholarships for diverse archives
workers, including retention and engagement, starting in FY25.
·
By July 2025, make recommendations to the SAA Council on a
plan, program, or track focused on building accessible leadership pathways for
diverse archives workers.
·
Consult with allied professional groups funding similar
programs. Examples include– but are not limited to– ACRL and the American
Society of Association Executives Diversity Executive Leadership Program.
·
Consult with SAA component groups who have implemented
similar programs. Examples include– but are not limited to– the Native American
Archives Section, the Harold T. Pinkett Student of Color Award, the Brenda S.
Banks Travel Award, and the Mosaic Scholarship.
·
Make recommendations to the SAA Council on necessary
actions to ensure continued participation of– and secure funding for– diverse
archives workers.
·
Explore options for securing ongoing funding for these
programs.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The Membership Funding and Pathways for Diverse Archives
Workers Task Force reports to the Council and works closely with its Council
liaison, the President, and the Chief Executive Officer to ensure that it is
responsive to the Council’s needs.
The chair is responsible for submitting a mid-term update
and annual report to the Council, a phase 1 report and recommendation by
December 2024, a phase 2 report and recommendation by the summer 2025 the SAA
Council meeting and may also submit items for Council action or discussion and
feedback as necessary.
The chair is also responsible for ensuring that minutes of
the Task Force’s meetings are prepared and posted on the Task Force’s microsite
to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping
requirements.
V. Meetings
The Task Force shall meet virtually as needed to conduct
its work. The Task Force may conduct its business by email, telephone, or
virtual meeting during the course of the year.
Adopted by Council: May 2022
I. Purpose
The Archival Compensation Task Force is responsible for 1) identifying issues related to archival compensation, including benefits, salary negotiations, working conditions, etc.; 2) studying and evaluating archival compensation in its entirety using past, current, and new data generated on the subject; 3) creating and disseminating an archival compensation survey to SAA members; and 4) exploring the feasibility of creating a standing body within SAA to liaise and communicate with non-archival entities (such as O-Net, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society, and others) to ensure that SAA continues advocacy efforts and activities, including research and documentation pertaining to these groups.
II. Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Task Force is charged for a two-year period beginning in February 2020, with a final report with recommendations due to the Council no later than January 2022. The Task Force will comprise eight SAA members (one of whom will serve as chair) and two non-members (such as compensation and recruitment professionals). Included among the SAA members appointed will be a member of the Business Archives Section, the Committee on Research, Data, and Assessment (CORDA), the Independent Archivists Section, and the Student and New Archives Professionals Section. Task Force members will be appointed by the SAA Vice President/President-Elect.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Task Force will prepare a written status report for the Council’s spring and fall meetings, and will prepare for Council consideration at its fall/winter 2022 meeting a final written report with recommendations.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill its purpose as described above, the Task Force is charged to:
V. Meetings
The Task Force will carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, conference calls, online meetings, and face-to-face meetings held in conjunction with the SAA Annual Meeting. Should the Task Force determine that an additional face-to-face meeting would be beneficial, it must apply to the Council (through the Executive Office) for funding.
Approved by the SAA Council, December 2019. Disbanded May 2023
I. Purpose
The SAA-ACRL/RBMS Joint Task Force to Revise the Statement on Access to Research Materials in Archives and Special Collections Libraries (hereafter “Task Force”) is responsible for reviewing and revising a Joint Statement that was last released by the two organizations in 2009. The Task Force should recommend any and all revisions that would bring the Statement up to date, and should consider two points raised by the SAA Committee on Public Policy:
The Statement will be submitted for approval by the executive bodies of SAA and the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) and ACRL’s Rare Books and Manuscripts Section (RBMS). The Task Force will recommend a plan for periodic review of the Statement at the time the Statement is submitted to SAA and ACRL/RBMS for approval.
II. Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Task Force is charged for a period that begins in September 2017 and continues through the August 2019 SAA Annual Meeting. The Task Force will include six members, with an equal number of members appointed by SAA and ACRL according to their normal appointment procedures. A Task Force member may be a member of both organizations but will be appointed to the Task Force representing one organization only. In addition to the committee members, ex officio members and liaisons may be appointed by each organization according to its normal procedures.
Due consideration will be given by each organization to appointing members who have the requisite knowledge and experience in access to research materials in archives and special collections libraries, and particularly those with knowledge of changes in this area since the 2009 Statement was issued.
One member appointed by each organization will be designated to serve as a Task Force co-chair. The co-chairs will be responsible for convening Task Force meetings, leading Task Force work, ensuring that deadlines are met, following procedures of their respective organizations, and communicating as needed or required with the executive bodies and staffs of their respective organizations.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Task Force co-chairs will report to the SAA and ACRL/RBMS executive bodies according to the following schedule:
More frequent reports are welcome but not required.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill its purpose as described above, the Task Force is specifically charged to:
V. Meetings
The Task Force will carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, conference calls, and online meetings in accordance with the meeting policies of the respective organizations. Face-to-face meetings may also be scheduled during the SAA Annual Meeting (pending space availability) and the midwinter and annual meetings of the American Library Association. Task Force members will be encouraged but not required to attend face-to-face meetings in person.
Minutes will be prepared for each face-to-face meeting and any conference call or online meeting that meets policy definitions for a meeting, and the minutes will be posted within thirty days to the public websites of the respective organizations.
Approved by the SAA Council in August 2017.
I. Purpose
The purpose of the task force is to review the process of selecting SAA Fellows and recommend any appropriate changes, clarifications, or guidelines that the task force thinks are warranted in administering this program in the future.
II. Size, Composition, Selection, Length of Term
The task force will comprise seven individuals and will include the 2019 chair of the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows, two current or past members of the Committee who have also served as SAA President, two former Council members, and two Fellows who have not served as SAA President.
The task force will be appointed by August 12, 2019, and its term will end with submission of a final report and recommendations on December 9, 2019.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The task force will review the questions put forward by the 2019 Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows as well as the composition of the committee as a whole, and make recommendations to the SAA Council about any changes or additional guidelines to be included in the Committee’s charge going forward.
IV. Reporting
The task force will prepare a final report with recommendations to the Council by December 31, 2019.
Approved by the SAA Council, August 2019.
I. Purpose
The Tragedy Response Initiative Task Force is responsible for 1) creating and/or compiling material for ready accessibility by archivists who are facing a sudden tragedy and 2) exploring the feasibility of creating a standing body within SAA that would update documentation as needed and serve as a volunteer tragedy response team.
II. Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Task Force is charged for a two-year period that begins in January 2018, with a final report and recommendations for the Council no later than January 2020.
The Task Force will comprise eight SAA members, one of whom will serve as chair. Task Force members will be appointed by the SAA Vice President/President-Elect.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Task Force chair will prepare a written status report for each of the Council’s spring and fall meetings, and will prepare for Council consideration at its fall/winter 2020 meeting a final written report with recommendations. Should the Task Force recommend that a standing group be created, it should include in its final report a draft charge/description for that group.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill its purpose as described above, the Task Force is specifically charged to:
V. Meetings
The Task Force will carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, conference calls, online meetings, and face-to-face meetings held in conjunction with the SAA Annual Meeting. Should the Task Force determine that an additional face-to-face meeting would be beneficial, it must apply to the Council (through the Executive Office) for funding.
Approved by the SAA Council, November 2017.
Disbanded March 2020, per end of task force term.
D. Membership, Meetings, and Other Privileges
Approved by the SAA Council: September 1989.
Revised: January 1991, February 1992, January 1993, March 2007, July 2008, February 2010, March 2011, June 2012, January 2013, July 2013, January 2014, July 2017.*
*Note: In July 2017, the SAA Council approved a plan to simplify SAA’s component group structure. Through this action, all roundtables became sections and Section X. Roundtables was removed from the SAA Governance Manual. Section IX. Sections became the bylaws that governed all sections, with each section having “standing rules” detailing unique governing procedures.
Accessibility and Disability Section
The Accessibility & Disability Section aims to be an inclusive community for people with disabilities and allies; where we can learn from each other, compile resources, and showcase work and collections promoting accessibility and disability representation.
Acquisitions and Appraisal Section
The Section provides a forum for discussion of issues and interests pertaining to the acquisition and appraisal of public records, private papers, and other archival or manuscript collections.
Archival Educators Section
Facilitates exchange of information about archival education programs throughout the United States and Canada and provides a forum for discussion of issues relevant to those who teach courses and workshops in archival administration and related topics, in both academic institutions and other settings.
Archival History Section
Stimulates interest among archivists in the profession's own past and suggests ways of studying its history.
Archives Management Section
Addresses the identification and consideration of management and leadership issues that are important to archivists and archival institutions and brings together archivists from dissimilar institutions who share these interests.
Archivists & Archives of Color Section
Provides a forum to identify and discuss concerns faced by racial minorities; encourages exchange of ideas by archivists with diverse racial backgrounds; promotes wider participation of minorities within the archival profession; ensures the preservation of archival materials pertaining to minorities; supports development of archival services and programs to minorities; and seeks funding for scholarships for minority students in library/information science master’s degree programs.
Archivists of Religious Collections Section
The Section represents a network of professional archivists who work for national, international, and local church organizations, religious societies and orders, and theological schools. Section members are engaged in documenting the many sides of the private and public experience of faith as it is lived out through the institutional church, religious movements, and individual experience. See also the ARCS legacy website.
Audio and Moving Image Section
Serve as a forum for discussing the role, needs, preservation, and management of sound recordings in audio and audiovisual archival collections.
Business Archives Section
The Section brings together archivists who administer non-current records of corporations and businesses from an historical and archival standpoint. This section also produces a Directory of Corporate Archives.
Collection Managment Tools Section
Provides a forum for archivists from all types of repositories to identify and discuss key issues relevant to the implementation, support, comparison, analyses, and integration of collection management tools and systems.
College and University Archives Section
The Section provides a forum for archivists who are concerned with the administration, organization, and care of records of institutions of higher education. Guidelines for College and University Archives are also available here.
Congressional Papers Section
Provides a means for discussion of archival issues involved in the acquisition, processing, and administration of the papers of members of the United States Congress.
Description Section
The Section provides a forum for persons involved in the development of appropriate means to organize and describe manuscripts and archives. Information and documentation on descriptive standards can be found here.
Design Records Section
The Section supports the preservation of design records that include, but are not limited to, architectural, engineering, landscape architecture, planning, urban design, graphic design, and construction records. The community discusses the storage, conservation, arrangement, preservation, access, and description problems inherent in specialized records. Provides a forum for members to discuss issues related to access and management of architectural, design, and related fields.
Diverse Sexuality and Gender Section
Provides a forum for archivists who are concerned with ensuring that the archival record includes documentation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender history and culture; ensures that LGBTQIA archival issues are identified and visible within SAA; and serves as a liaison between independent LGBTQIA archives and SAA.
Electronic Records Section
The Section functions as a locus of expertise, leadership, and information sharing for SAA regarding management and preservation of records in electronic form.
Encoded Archival Standards (EAS) Section
Promotes the implementation and use of encoding standards for dissemination of archival information. To this end, the Section aims to provide tools and information for use in encoding archival descriptions; promotes discussion and facilitates the use of software for markup, parsing, indexing, and delivery; and monitors and contributes to encoding standard development for archival description.
Government Records Section
The Section provides a forum for archivists who are concerned with the administration, organization, and care of records of government.
Human Rights Archives Section
Aims to create a space for SAA members and other stakeholders (human rights advocates, scholars, government officials, and non-governmental organization workers) to increase dialogue and collaboration on issues related to the collection, preservation, disclosure, legal implications, and ethics of human rights documentation.
Independent Archivists Section
Seeks to facilitate and foster the sharing of ideas, information, and support among archivists outside the traditional archival repository, including independent contractors, private archivists, digital archivists, and freelance and consulting archivists.
International Archival Affairs Section
Identifies and addresses issues and concerns of archives and archivists throughout the world, and provides a forum for discussion, dissemination, and promotion of issues related to international archival affairs.
Issues & Advocacy Section
Dedicated to finding news of, and formulating for the SAA Council's consideration, possible responses to archives- and records-related issues and events.
Labor Archives Section
Promotes communication among archivists and institutions concerned with records in the field of labor and develops cooperative strategies and guidelines to ensure comprehensive documentation of the labor movement. Maintains a Directory of Labor Archives in the United States and Canada.
Latin American and Caribbean Cultural Heritage Archives Section (LACCHA)
Serves as a forum for discussion and advice on issues relating to the management and preservation of archival and cultural heritage materials housed in U.S. repositories and originating from the Latin American and Caribbean area or created in the United States by Latin American and Caribbean diaspora or special-interest groups.
Local Government Records Section
Provides a forum for dialogue among archivists who are concerned with the administration, organization, and care of records of local government.
Manuscript Repositories Section
The Section serves as a forum for the discussion of issues and interests pertaining to the acquisition and administration of manuscripts created outside the collecting institution.
Metadata and Digital Object Section
Promotes discussion, education, and collaboration among archivists who are interested in digitization, digital archival objects, and the metadata that enables access, management, and preservation of digital objects.
Military Archives Section
Provides a forum to facilitate collaboration and information sharing among archival institutions, universities, governments, legal bodies, and nongovernment agencies that are documenting and preserving records of issues related to the military and military service.
Museum Archives Section
The Section provides a forum for museum archivists, who are responsible for the organization and care of archival materials held and/or created by their institution. A museum's records document the history and development of the museum, its collections, exhibitions, and programs as well as the contributions of individuals and groups associated with the museum. The Museum Archives Section newsletters are available online on the Museum Archives section Group Web Page and here via the Canadian Heritage Information Network website.
Native American Archives Section
Serves as a forum to educate archivists on the complexities and beauty of Native American archives of the western hemisphere and as a source of communication and inspiration for archivists working with Native American collections.
Oral History Section
The Section brings together persons who are interested in the administration and use of oral history interviews in the archival setting, including those who conduct oral history interviews and those who teach oral history methodology.
Performing Arts Section
Encourages the exchange of information on historical and contemporary documentation of music, dance, theater, and other performance media.
Preservation Section
The Section provides a forum for professionals with a special interest in the problems presented by the deterioration, preservation, and restoration of archival materials in all formats.
Privacy and Confidentiality Section
Provides a forum for discussion of privacy and confidentiality issues and their legal and ethical implications for archival practice.
Public Library Archives / Special Collections Section
Encourages advocacy for and education about archival, manuscript, local history, genealogy, and other historic and special collections within public libraries of all sizes; provides an arena for discussion and dissemination of best practices of the archives, library, museum, and history fields; and works to support the informational, historical, and cultural interests that converge in public library archives and special collections.
Records Management Section
Encourages discussion of current issues in records and information management and promotes better understanding of the importance of collaborative efforts between archivists and records managers.
Reference, Access and Outreach Section
The Section provides a forum for archivists who work with the users of archives, particularly those with reference responsibilities and those who integrate archival and manuscript materials into exhibits and other public programs.
Research Libraries Section
Promotes discussion and collaboration on initiatives and research projects that affect archivists working in a research library context.
Science, Technology, and Health Care Section
Provides a forum for archivists with interests or holdings in science, technology, and health care, presenting opportunities to exchange information, solve problems, and share successes.
Security Section
Focuses on issues relating to the prevention of theft in archival and manuscript repositories.
Solo Archivists Section
Provides education, stimulates communication, and encourages support among archivists working in "solo archivist" settings. The term "solo archivist" includes those working alone or in very small staff situations.
Students and New Archives Professionals Section (SNAP)
Focuses attention on and gives voice to the needs and concerns of its members--in particular, students, interns, new professionals, early-career archivists, and individuals seeking professional employment--within SAA and the field in general.
Visual Materials Section
The Section brings together archivists who administer (collect, arrange, preserve, describe, and interpret) still photographs, moving images, art, and graphic materials.
Web Archiving Section
Works to heighten advocacy and awareness of the issues that archivists encounter related to the selection, appraisal, harvesting, management, and preservation of web resources.
Women Archivists Section
Monitors the status of women in the archival profession, and promotes the participation of women in all phases of SAA's activities and the profession as a whole.
Women’s Collections Section
Promotes the preservation and research use of records documenting women and networks archivists with holdings concerning or created by women.
Roster of SAA Representatives to External Groups
Approved by the Council: June 1988
Revised: January 1991, August 2012, May 2013
Group Web Page: http://www.certifiedarchivists.org/
Official Charge:
The Academy of Certified Archivists, founded at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archivists, is an independent not-for-profit organization for certifying professional archivists.
II. Number and Length of Appointments
A. SAA is represented by the executive director ex officio on a continuing basis and by a Council member selected by the Council for a two-year term.
B. The SAA vice president shall appoint the Council member to serve as representative from among the incoming second-year Council members.
C. If possible, the appointed Council representative should be a Certified Archivist.
III. Duties
A. The Executive Director is responsible for financial issues.
B. The Council member represents the Society on issues of archival policy, such as education, publications and standards, in which SAA and ACA have a mutual interest; and on issues where coordination of efforts is desirable, such as the work of the nominating committees.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The Council member prepares an annual report to Council in accordance with established procedures and reports to Council when necessary throughout the year.
V. Meetings
The SAA Council member meets with ACA at the SAA's Annual Meeting and at special meetings called by the ACA when appropriate. The Executive Director may also attend ACA meetings as appropriate.
VI. Related SAA Bodies
A. Committee on Education
B. Archival Educators Roundtable
C. Standards Committee
Approved by Council: September 1991
Revised: August 6, 2012
International Council on Archives (ICA)
Experts Group on Archival Description (EGAD)
Group Web Page: https://www.ica.org/en/about-egad.
International Council on Archives (ICA)
Forum of Professional Associations (FPA)
Group Web Page: https://www.ica.org/en/forum-of-professional-associations-fpa
The Forum of Professional Associations of the International Council on Archives represents professional associations who are interested in the administration, preservation and use of records and archives. Formerly called the Section of Professional Associations (SPA), the Forum was established October 2021 by vote of the ICA Extraordinary General Assembly. FPA and has over 60 members. It is managed by a Steering Committee.
All professional associations are encouraged to join FPA and to take advantage of being part of the international archival community.
FPA aims to strengthen and unite the archival profession globally and to help its member associations develop their organizations and increase their influence. It does this by producing guidelines and advice to associations aimed at improving their services and enhancing their community profile, and by organizing and supporting seminars and conferences. It also supports an archival solidarity project which works to coordinate international foreign assistance projects.
II. Number and Length of Appointments
The Academy of Certified Archivists and SAA are represented jointly by a single individual appointed by the SAA Vice President1 (in consultation with the appropriate ACA leader[s]) for a four-year term that is renewable. To facilitate the possibility of the election of SAA’s representative to the Executive Committee of ICA FPA, the term of appointment runs through the ICA meeting of the final year of appointment.
Selection of the ACA/SAA representative to ICA FPA is based on the following criteria:
III. Duties
A. Participate actively as a member of the ICA FPA Steering Committee.
B. Gain support for joint action on questions of interest to professional associations.
C. Recommend actions that SAA may endorse or pursue in the international arena.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The representative prepares an annual report to the Council in accordance with established procedures. Additionally, the representative provides a written report to the Council within 30 days of attending an ICA meeting. All reporting requirements are the responsibility of the appointed representative, regardless of whether she/he is able to attend any meetings.
V. Meetings
The ACA/SAA representative generally attends both the ICA Annual General Meeting (in the fall) and the ICA Forum of Professional Associations Meeting (in the spring). In addition, the representative may attend the quadrennial ICA Congress. SAA funds attendance at ICA meetings as the annual budget permits.
VI. Related SAA Bodies
A. SAA Sections and Roundtables as appropriate
B. Standards Committee
VI. Group Contact Information
International Council on Archives - Conseil international des Archives
60, rue des Francs-Bourgeois
75003 Paris, France
Phone: + 33 (0)1 40 27 63 06
Fax: + 33 (0)1 42 72 20 65
ica@ica.org
Approved by the Council: May 2003
Revised: August 2013.
Updated Nov 2022, per ICA change from "Section on Professional Archival Associations" to "Forum of Professional Associations" (Oct 2021).
1 As long as this representation remains a joint effort between ACA and SAA, the Vice President’s appointment is made in consultation with the ACA leader who makes ACA’s appointments.
Group Web Page: http://historycoalition.org/
The National Coalition for History (NCH) comprises approximately 64 member organizations and exists "to serve as a central educational/advocacy outreach office for history and archives … it seeks to encourage study and appreciation of history and archives by serving as a clearinghouse of information to, and encouraging cooperation between the historical and archival professions and their partners. The NCH promotes the interest in history and archives on the state and federal levels, with special attention given to the funding and welfare of public agencies with history or archival programs and policies, regulations, agency directives, and programs that affect historical and archival interests.
II. Number and Length of Appointments
SAA is represented by the Executive Director or a member appointed by the vice president/president-elect to serve a three year term which may or may not be renewed.
III. Duties
A. Present an archival perspective and agenda items to the Policy Board of the Committee (SAA is a member of the Policy Board by virtue of the dollar amount of its annual contribution to the NCH).
B. Participate in at least one of the two NCH meetings.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The representative prepares an annual report to Council in accordance with established procedures and reports to Council when needed on other occasions.
V. Meetings
The NCH meets twice a year at the annual meetings of the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians.
VI. Related SAA Bodies
A. Government Records Section
B. Manuscript Repositories Section
C. Reference, Access, and Outreach Section
D. Congressional Papers Roundtable
E. SAA Representative to NHPRC
Approved by the Council: February 2003
Revised: May 2013
Group Web Page: http://www.archives.gov/nhprc/
Through its grant programs, the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC) is one of the major funding sources for a wide variety of projects through its two programs of support for historical publications and preservation and use of historical records. NHPRC recommends the expenditure of appropriated or donated funds for the collecting, describing, preserving, compiling, and publishing of documentary sources significant to the history of the United States, and for Institutes, training and educational programs and fellowships related to those activities. It also disseminates information about documentary sources through guides, directories, and other technical publications. Because NHPRC is one of the chief grant funders to the archival community, SAA's representative carries great responsibility to voice the concerns of archives and archivists.
II. Number and Length of Appointments
Under federal statutes, SAA is represented by a single representative chosen for one four-year term by the SAA Council upon recommendation by the SAA President.
Commission members are subject to federal conflict of interest regulations as well as specific guidelines adopted by the Commission.
III. Duties
A. Report the best interests of the archival community to the Commission.
B. Report to the Council annually and after each NHPRC meeting on the discussions and decisions thereof.
C. Seek advice from Council on issues to be placed on the agenda for consideration at future NHPRC meetings.
D. Participate, when possible, in the various committees of NHPRC as a way of furthering the archival agenda, particularly among those commission members who are not familiar with archives.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The representative prepares an annual report and a three-year plan to Council in accordance with established procedures and reports to Council when needed on other occasions.
V. Meetings
NHPRC meets two times a year in Washington, D.C., at the National Archives. All of the expenses of the representative are paid by the Commission.
Approved by Council: February 1991
Group Web Page: http://history.state.gov/about/hac
The Advisory Committee consists of representatives of historical and other professional associations who advise the Office of the Historian of the U.S. Department of State on the preservation, processing, use, and publication of State Department records. The qualifications method of selection and terms of service are specified by federal law.
II. Number and Length of Appointments
A single representative is appointed for a three-year term by the U.S. Secretary of State from a list of three candidates submitted by the SAA President.
III. Qualifications
A. Each member of the Committee must have a security clearance in order to review classified materials.
B. No officer or employee of the United States government may be a member of the Advisory Committee.
IV. Duties
A. Provide advice on the preparation of the Foreign Relations series published by the U.S. Department of State.
B. Advise on access to Department of State records.
C. Provide counsel on related archival concerns.
V. Reporting Procedures
The representative prepares an annual report to Council in accordance with established procedures and reports to Council when needed on other occasions.
VI. Meetings
The Committee meets at least four times per year in Washington, D.C. Members may review materials between meetings. All expenses are reimbursed.
VII. Related SAA Bodies
A. Government Records Section
B. Reference, Access and Outreach Section
C. Congressional Papers Roundtable
Approved by Council: January 1991
Established: February 28, 2010
Disbanded: 2018
Group Web Page: http://www.arma.org/standards/development/index.cfm
Established: 1993
Disbanded: 2020
Group Web Page: http://www.niso.org/home/
I. Purpose
The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) develops and promotes consensus-approved standards used in library services, publishing, and other information-related industries. NISO standards are American National Standards that address the communication needs of its membership in areas such as information retrieval, preservation of materials, information transfer, forms and records, identification systems, publication formats, and equipment and supplies. NISO standards are developed through voluntary committees where most of the research, discussion, and drafting takes place. Once the standard has been drafted, voting members review and approve or reject it. NISO's membership includes professional associations, libraries, publishers, corporations, and state and federal organizations. Many of the standards developed, approved and promulgated by NISO affect the way in which information about and in archival records is preserved and accessed. It is critical that archivists' views be represented in deliberations that ultimately affect our most basic professional practices. SAA is a voting member of NISO.
II. Number and Length of Appointments
A single representative is appointed for a two-year term and may serve successive terms. Given the range of work performed by NISO, the representative should have broad archival experience.
III. Duties
A. Circulate proposed standards to the Standards Committee, relevant component groups of SAA, and members with appropriate expertise; assist the Standards Committee in gathering and compiling comments from membership; cast SAA's vote on proposed standards.
B. Inform the SAA membership (through the Standards Committee, articles in Archival Outlook, and other means) of draft NISO standards coming up for vote and of the formation of committees or working groups to revise or develop new standards, thus encouraging SAA membership to become involved in standards work.
C. Represent archival interests at NISO annual meeting and in discussions relating to development and composition of committees to work on standards.
D. Serve as an ex officio member of SAA’s Standards Committee.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The representative reports to the Standards Committee after each NISO annual meeting, prepares an annual report for inclusion in the Standards Committee's annual report to the Council in accordance with established procedures, and reports to the Council when needed on other occasions.
V. Meetings
NISO holds a major annual meeting in various locations. Other meetings of working groups and committees are held as needed; the NISO representative, substitute, or other SAA members may be involved on one or more standards development committees. (Note: SAA does not fund attendance at NISO meetings.)
VI. Related SAA Bodies
A. Standards Committee
B. SAA/ALA/AAM Joint Committe on Archives, Libraries, and Museums
C. Preservation Section
D. Description Section
E. Electronic Records Section
F. Visual Materials Section
G. Metadata and Digital Object Roundtable
VI. Group Contact Information
National Information Standards Organization
3600 Clipper Mill Road
Suite 302
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: 301-654-2512
Fax: 410-685-5278
VII. Review Date
This charge should be reviewed five years after its date of approval.
Approved by the Council: January 1993
Revised: August 2013
Established: October 17, 2013
Disbanded: 2020
Group Web Page: http://alcts.ala.ccdablog/
Secondary Email List: http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/advisory.html
I. Purpose
It is important for the views of archivists to be represented in deliberations about standards for description and access promulgated in the library world.
The Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access (CC:DA) is the body within the American Library Association (ALA) responsible for developing official ALA positions on additions to and revisions to RDA: Resource Description and Access (RDA). The standards embodied in RDA are used in catalog records found in national data bases and in local catalogs. This is a non-voting liaison.
The MARC Advisory Committee (MAC) advises the Library of Congress concerning changes to the MARC 21 format. The committee responds to proposals for changes in the format proposed by the community, including national libraries, bibliographic networks, and the ALCTS/LITA Metadata Standards Committee. As seen by the change from AACR to RDA, it is important that the archival perspective be represented in discussions about descriptive metadata standards that are used by many archivists.
II. Number and Length of Appointments
A single representative to CC:DA and MAC is appointed for a two-year term, and may be re-appointed for successive terms.
The representative should have expertise in description and access, and experience as a cataloger of archival collections and manuscript material, including non-paper formats.
III. Duties
IV. Reporting Procedures
The representative reports to the Standards Committee after each CC:DA and MAC meeting, prepares an annual report for inclusion in the Standards Committee’s annual report to Council in accordance with established procedures, and reports to Council when needed on other occasions.
The representative has no reporting requirements to CC:DA or MAC.
V. Meetings
The committees meet twice a year during the ALA's annual meeting in June and at the ALA's January midwinter meeting. (Note: SAA does not fund attendance at these meetings.)
VI. Related SAA Groups
VII. Group Contact Information
ALCTS Executive Director
American Library Association
50 East Huron Street
Chicago, Illinois 60611-2795
Phone: 1-800-545-2433 x5030
Approved by the SAA Council (separate reps): 1991
Revised (reps combined): October 2013
Established: September 30, 2014
Disbanded: 2018
I. Purpose
The purpose of the Coalition is to work in deliberate coordination across organizational boundaries to devise and strengthen sustainable continuing education and professional programs that will transform the archives, library, and museum workforces in ways that lead to measureable impact on our nation’s communities.
As of formation of the Coalition in 2013, three working groups have been established to address that purpose (descriptions prepared by the Coalition):
II. Number and Length of Appointments
SAA is represented by up to three individuals appointed by the SAA Vice President, in consultation with the Executive Committee and the Committee on Education, for two-year terms that are renewable.
One individual will serve as “lead” representative to the Coalition and as representative to the “Governance and Coalition-Building” working group. Criteria for serving in this role are the following:
Up to two individuals will serve as representatives to the Coalition’s “Assessing the Field” and “Developing a Prototype” working groups. Criteria for serving in these roles are the following:
III. Duties
IV. Reporting Procedures
Each representative prepares an annual report to the Council in accordance with established procedures. (The annual reports shall be compiled and submitted as a whole by the lead representative.) Additionally, each representative provides a written report to the Council within 30 days of attending a Coalition or working group meeting. All reporting requirements are the responsibility of the appointed representative, regardless of whether she/he is able to attend meetings.
V. Meetings
The Coalition will seek funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services and the Gates Foundation for support of its work, including funding for meetings. (Note: SAA does not fund attendance at Coalition or working group meetings.)
(The Coalition will meet in person in October 2014 to review and assess progress, refine directions, and consider further plans for collaborative action in professional development and continuing education.)
VI. Related SAA Bodies
Approved by the Council: September 2014
See also: - Section VII: Committees and Boards
- SAA Awards Program
The Archival Innovator Award recognizes an archivist, a group of archivists, a repository, or an organization that demonstrates the greatest overall current impact on the profession or their communities. Nominee(s) should meet as many of the following criteria as possible:
The work should be undertaken within the past three years—it need not be completed, but it must be sufficiently advanced to demonstrate results.
Created in 2011, thie award is funded by the Society of American Archivists Foundation.
A certificate and complimentary registration for the recipient(s) (if a repository or an organzation, then one representative) to the SAA Annual Meeting occurring in the year in which the award is presented.
2012
The Archival Innovators Award Subcommittee of the Awards Committee is composed of three members of the Society of American Archivists and one of the co-chairs of the SAA Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair and shall present the award during the Awards Ceremony at the SAA Annual Meeting.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Indigenous Archival Training Program
2023: Opioid Industry Documents Archive
2022: Community-Driven Archives at Arizona State University Library AND the Center for Michigan Jewish Heritage
2021: National Archives and Records Administration’s History Hub
2020: Invisible Histories Project
2019: Brooklyn Connections, a school outreach program of the Brooklyn Public Library
2018: Dr. Doug Boyd, director of the Louie B. Nunn Center for Oral History in the University of Kentucky Libraries
2017: No applicants
2016: Dr. Foy Scalf, head of the Research Archives and Integrated Database Project Team at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago
2015: State Archives of Florida's Florida Memory Team
2014: Trevor Owens, National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program at the Library of Congress
2013: Augmented Processing Table Research Team, The University of Texas at Austin School of Information, Dr. Ciaran B. Trace and Dr. Luis Francisco-Revilla
2012: Not awarded
Purpose and Criteria for Selection:
Created in 2017, this award recognizes and acknowledges individuals of color, such as those of African, Asian, Latinx, Middle Eastern/North African, Native American, Alaska Native, or Pacific Islander descent, and who have demonstrated professional archival experience and manifest an interest in becoming active members of the Society of American Archivists.
This award supports the Society of American Archivists’ Archivists and Archives of Color Section’s objectives of:
Recipients will be selected based on their submission of a completed application and the strength of their personal statement/essay. Personal statements/essays must be no more than 500 words and will be evaluated on:
Eligibility:
The applicant:
Sponsor and Funding:
Sponsored by the SAA Archivists and Archives of Color Section and funded through the SAA Foundation, the award is named in honor of Brenda S. Banks, Fellow and Past President of SAA and co-founder of the Archivists and Archives of Color Section.
Prize:
One award may be given during each awards cycle. The recipient receives full complimentary registration and related expenses for hotel and travel to attend the SAA Annual Meeting during the year in which the award is received. In addition, the recipient receives a complimentary one-year membership in SAA.
Selection Committee:
The Brenda S. Banks Travel Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee comprises four members of the Society of American Archivists (one of whom will be the current junior co-chair of the Archivists and Archives of Color Section) and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). Of the three remaining members, one shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-Elect to serve a three-year term, and shall serve as chair of the subcommittee in their third year.
Application Deadline and Requirements:
Click here to preview the application and/or to apply. All applications must be submitted by February 28 of each year and include the following:
2024: Janine Smith (Loyola University New Orleans)
2023: Marisa Ramirez (William H. Hannon Library at Loyola Marymount University)
2022: Polly Peralta (former intern at the Museum of Pop Culture)
2021: Shelly Black (Cyma Rubin Library Fellow at North Carolina State University)
2020: Victor Betts (North Carolina State University's Special Collections Research Center)
2019: Tracy Drake (Chicago Public Library’s Vivian G. Harsh Research Center)
2018: Saida Largaespada (University of California, Los Angeles)
The C.F.W. Coker Award for Description recognizes finding aids, finding aid systems, projects that involve innovative development in archival description, or descriptive tools that enable archivists to produce effective finding aids. To merit consideration for the award, nominees must set national standards, represent a model for archival description, or otherwise have a substantial impact on descriptive practices. The following types of works or activities may be considered:
Individuals, institutions, or groups of individuals or institutions. There are no restrictions on the format in which information is presented. Both published and unpublished works produced during the preceding calendar year are eligible. This award is not intended for books or articles on descriptive theory. Works and activities must involve projects located primarily in North America.
Established in 1984, the award is named in memory of C.F.W. Coker, a Fellow of the Society of American Archivists who worked at the National Archives and Records Administration and the Library of Congress, where he was the head of the Reference and Reader Service Section in the Manuscript Division. Coker was also director of the Modern Archives Institute, editor of The American Archivist, and general editor of the first SAA Basic Manual Series.The award is funded by the Society of American Archivists Foundation.
A certificate and a cash prize of $250.
1984
The Coker Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee consists of four members of the Society of American Archivists (one of whom shall be the current chair of the Description Section, who shall serve a term concurrent with his or her office) and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). One of the remaining members of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as chair and present the award.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Susan P. Waide
2023: Not awarded
2022: Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries' In Her Own Right Project
2021: Indigenous Digital Archives DigiTreaties Treaties Explorer (created by the Museum of Indian Arts and Culture and the Indigenous Digital Archives, in partnership with the National Archives and Records Administration’s Office of Innovation and the Conservation Department, and Digirati)
2020: Archives for Black Lives in Philadelphia (A4BLiP)
2019: Lou Reed papers processed by the Archives Unit on behalf of the Music Division in the Library for the Performing Arts of the New York Public Library
2018: The University of California Guidelines for Born-Digital Archival Description
2017: K.J. Rawson, Digital Transgender Archive, College of the Holy Cross
2016: Not awarded
2015: The Social Networks and Archival Context (SNAC) Project
2014: Remixing Archival Metadata Project, University of Miami
2013: Princeton University Library Archival Description Working Group: Daniel Santamaria (chair), Maureen Callahan, John Delaney, Shaun Ellis, Regine Heberlein, Jon Stroop, and Don Thornbury
2012: Not awarded
2011: John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum
2010: North Carolina State University Libraries Special Collections Research Center
2009: World War II: Guide to Records Relating to U.S. Military Participation
2008: The Archivists’ Toolkit™ (AT)
2007: Greg Bradsher
2006: The Walt Whitman Archive
2005: Online Archives of California
2004: RLG's EAD Advisory Group
2003: Not awarded
2002: Not awarded
2001: Waverly Lowell, Kelcy Shepherd
2000: Not awarded
1999: Francis X. Blouin, Leonard A. Coombs, Claudia Carlen, Elizabeth Yakel, Katherine J. Gill
1998: Encoded Archival Description Working Group
1997: Robert B. Matchette; Honorable Mention: Mary Lynn McCree Bryan
1996: Not awarded
1995: Robert M. Kvasnicka
1994: Not awarded
1993: Diane Vogt-O'Connor
1992: Not awarded
1991: David Brumberg, Elaine Engst
1990: The Center for Legislative Archives (NARA)
1989: Scott Cline
1988: Frederick Honhart
1987: Not awarded
1986: Nancy Sahli, Lisa B. Weber
1985: Debra L. Newman
1984: Roy Turnbaugh
Created by the SAA Council in 1980 at the request of the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows, this citation recognizes a special contribution to the archives profession, and especially to SAA, that is not eligible for one of the other awards given by the Society. It is given on an occasional basis at the discretion of the Council or upon recommendation to the Council by the Awards Committee.
A plaque.
1980
The SAA Council.
Not applicable.
2024: lndigenizing Archival Training program, Archives Gig and I Need a Library Job, Digital Library Federation’s Born-Digital Access Working Group, National Best Practices for Archival Accessioning Working Group, and Librarians and Archivists with Palestine
2023: Teaching with Primary Sources Collective
2022: Barbara Teague, Bryan Whitledge, The Intellectual Property Working Group
2021: Dorothy Berry, SAA Diversity Committee, SAA Staff, The Blackivists
2020: Dictionary Working Group, Archival Metrics Research Investigators (Elizabeth Yakel, Wendy Duff, Helen Tibbo), Lori Lindberg, Mark Puente
2019: Dr. Michael J. Kurtz
2018: Documenting the Now
2017: Sustainable Heritage Network, Teaching with Primary Sources Committee
2016: Business Archives Section, Oral History Section, William J. Maher
2015: Mark. A. Greene, Digital Archives Specialist Subcommittee of the Education Committe, and Committee on Advocacy and Public Policy
2014: Solveig De Sutter
2013: Peter J. Wosh
2012: Native American Protocols Forum Working Group, Michael J. Fox, Nancy P. Beaumont
2011: Mary Jo Pugh
2010: David Carmicheal, Kathleen Roe, U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy (VT)
2009: SAA's Intellectual Property Working Group, David B. Gracy II
2008: Troup County (Georgia) Archives, Larry Gates, Teresa Brinati
2007: Trudy Huskamp Peterson, Victoria Irons Walch
2006: Robert M. Schmidt
2005: Robert S. Martin
2004: John W. Carlin
2003: Brenda Banks, Carroll Dendler, Alexandra Gressitt, Debra Nolan
2002: Not awarded
2001: Carroll Dendler
2000: Not awarded
1999: Not awarded
1998: Dennis Harrison, Kris Kiesling
1992-97: Not awarded
1991: Susan Grigg, Timothy Ericson
1990: Not awarded
1989: Edie Hedlin, Paul Chestnut, J. Frank Cook, James B. Rhoads, Carole Huxley
1981-88: Not awarded
1980: Mary Walton Livingston
The Distinguished Service Award recognizes an archival institution, education program, nonprofit organization, or government organization that has provided outstanding service to its public and has made an exemplary contribution to the archives profession. The institution being nominated should have achieved distinction in one or more of the following ways:
Any archival institution, archival organization, records center, or manuscript repository, archival education program, or nonprofit or government organization providing service or support to the archives community in North America.
In addition to a completed nomination form, each nomination must include three letters of support, of which at least two are from SAA members, each representing a different institution. Self-nominations are accepted and encouraged.
Created in 1964 through the generosity of three SAA Fellows—Leon de Valinger Jr., Mary Givens Bryan, and Delores Renze—the award was revised in 1993 and is funded through the Society of American Archivists Foundation.
A plaque.
The Distinguished Service Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee is composed of three members of SAA and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA Vice President to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
Updates Approved by Council: August 2024
2024: FRASER Team of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2023: BitCurator Consortium
2022: ChromaDiverse, Inc.
2021: Knox County Archives and Doris Rivers Martinson
2020: Orange County Regional History Center
2019: New England Archivists Mentoring Program
2018: Council of State Archivists AND Society of Southwest Archivists
2017: No applicants
2016: Georgia Archives Institute
2015: Archives Leadership Institute
2014: Not awarded
2013: Black Metropolis Research Consortium
2012: Archival Education Collaborative
2011: Not awarded
2010: American Heritage Center, University of Wyoming
2009: National Historical Publications and Records Commission, National Archives and Records Administration
2008: Thomas J. Dodd Research Center, University of Connecticut
2007: Not awarded
2006: The Modern Archives Institute, National Archives and Records Administration
2005: Not awarded
2004: The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley
2003: Not awarded
2002: Duke University
2001: The Ohio Historical Society
2000: Not awarded
1999: Not awarded
1998: Masters of Archival Studies Program at the University of British Columbia
1997: Not awarded
1996: Not awarded
1995: Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives, The Johns Hopkins University
1994: The Research Libraries Group
1993: Not awarded
1992: Oberlin College Archives
1991: Billy Graham Center Archives, Wheaton College
1990: The Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University
1989: Not awarded
1988: Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan
1987: New York State Archives
1986: Not awarded
1985: American Institute of Physics, Center for the History of Physics
1984: Public Archives of Canada
1983: Not awarded
1982: Illinois State Archives
1981: City of Toronto Archives
1980: Minnesota Historical Society, Division of Archives and Manuscripts
1977: Georgia Department of Archives and History
1976: Wayne State University, Archives of Labor History and Urban Affairs
1975: Ohio Historical Society
1972: Oregon State Archives
1970: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
1969: Colorado Division of State Archives and Public Records
1968: Not awarded
1967: Not awarded
1966: Wisconsin State Historical Society, Department of Archives and Manuscripts
1965: Maryland Hall of Records
1964: North Carolina Department of Archives and History
Purpose and Criteria for Selection:
Established in 2011 and intended to address SAA’s strategic priority on diversity, this award recognizes an individual, group, or institution for outstanding contributions in advancing diversity within the archives profession, SAA, or the archival record. Nominees will have demonstrated significant achievement in the form of activism, education, outreach, publication, service, or other initiatives in the archives field. The award is given based on the long-term impact on improving and promoting diversity as defined in the SAA Statement on Diversity and Inclusion.
Open to an individual, group, or organization. To encourage SAA member participation, preference may be given to SAA individual and/or institutional members.
Two letters of support. Nominations will be accepted from any individual, group, or institution.
Society of American Archivists Foundation.
Up to two awards may be given each year. The prize will include a certificate and one complimentary registration per awardee to the SAA Annual Meeting occurring in the year in which the award is presented.
2012
The Diversity Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee is composed of four members of the Society of American Archivists (one of whom shall be the current chair of the Diversity Committee) and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). Of the three remaining members, one shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair and shall present the award during the Awards Ceremony at the SAA Annual Meeting.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2023: Gregory Hinton, author, historian, and creator of the Out West program series
2022: Julie Varee, community outreach archivist at the Anchorage Museum in Alaska
2021: Judy Tyrus, cofounder and CEO of ChromaDiverse, Inc.
2020: Rebecca Hankins
2019: Puerto Rico Citizenship Archives Project
2018: Community Archivist Program at the Austin History Center AND Maya from the Margins Archives Project at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2017: Texas Disability History Collection at the University of Texas at Arlington Libraries AND Tretter Collection in Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies at the University of Minnesota Libraries
2016: SAA Latin American and Cultural Heritage Archives Roundtable webinar series, “Desmantelando Fronteras/Breaking Down Borders”
2015: The Shorefront Legacy Center AND Samuel Proctor Oral History Program, University of Florida
2014: Recovering the U.S. Hispanic Literary Heritage Program, University of Houston AND Jennifer O'Neal, University of Oregon Libraries
2013: Asian/Pacific/American Institute at New York University AND Joan Krizack, Archives Consultant AND Karen Underhill, Northern Arizona University’s Cline Library
2012: The Chicano Studies Research Center
Established in 2005, this award supports students and recent graduates from graduate archival education degree programs within North America to attend SAA’s Annual Meeting. The goal of the scholarship is to stimulate greater participation in the activities of the Society by students and recent graduates. This participation must include either a presentation of research during the Annual Meeting or active participation in an SAA-sponsored committee or section.
Awarded to an SAA member in good standing who is currently enrolled in an archival education degree program or who graduated from an archival education degree program in the previous calendar year. Applications are evaluated based on the merits of the applicant’s essay and letters of recommendation. If the scholarship is declined by an individual selected by the subcommittee, the subcommittee may select an alternate from the pool of applications received for that year. If, for any reason, the subcommittee is unable to select an awardee, it may choose not to award the scholarship for that year.
The Society of American Archivists Foundation, in honor of Donald Peterson (1908–1999), New York lawyer and philatelist, whose deep appreciation of world history and preservation developed early through his stamp collecting and held true throughout his life.
Up to $1,500 in support of registration, travel, and accommodation expenses associated with the SAA Annual Meeting.
2006
The subcommittee consists of three members of the Society of American Archivists and one of the co-chairs of the SAA Awards Committee (ex officio). The members shall be appointed as necessary by the SAA President-Elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as chair and present the award.
Click here to preview the application and/or to apply. All applications must be submitted by February 28 of each year and include the following:
1. A 500-word essay describing the applicant's career goals and potential impact on the archival profession.
2. Unofficial transcript to verify student status or copy of graduate diploma.
3. Two letters of recommendation from individuals having definite knowledge of the applicant's qualifications. NOTE: Please notify your references ahead of time. Your references will need to upload their letters of recommendation to your online form by the application deadline.
2024: Sandy Yang (University of Alabama)
2023: Erika Alfieri (Florida State University)
2022: Katherine Schlesinger (University of Arizona, Library and Information Science Program)
2021: Sidney Louie (University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Library and Information Science Program)
2020: Jeanie Pai (Queens College)
2019: Alexis Recto (University of California, Los Angeles)
2018: Jessica Serrao (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
2017: Elizabeth Vallen (University of California, Merced)
2016: Alessandro Meregaglia (Indiana University Bloomington)
2015: Colin Post (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
2014: Michelle Chiles (Simmons College)
2013: Samantha Norling (Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis)
2012: Amanda Strauss
2011: Brittany Turner
2010: Keara Duggan
2009: Jessica Sedgwick
2008: Katherine Blank
2007: Chela Scott Weber
2006: Jessica Lemieux
In January 1998, SAA Fellow, past president, and long-time member F. Gerald Ham and his wife Elsie established the F. Gerald Ham and Elsie Ham Scholarship Fund. The purpose of the fund, endowed in 2008, is to provide financial support to graduate students in a professional archival studies program. Criteria for selection of the award recipient includes the applicant’s past performance in her/his graduate program in archival studies as well as a faculty member's assessment of the student’s prospects for contributing to the archives profession. Selection will be made based on merit.
The scholarship funds must be used to support the graduate archival education of a student who is studying at a United States university program that meets the criteria for graduate education set forth by the Society of American Archivists' Guidelines for a Graduate Program in Archival Studies. The student must have successfully completed a minimum of three (3) semester credit hours, or the equivalent, of a course(s) meeting the definition of "core archival knowledge" presented in the Guidelines. The course(s) must be completed by the time of application (February 28).
The Society of American Archivists Foundation.
The Ham Scholarship Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee is composed of three SAA Fellows and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair.
A scholarship of $10,000. Also included is complimentary registration to the SAA Annual Meeting in the year in which the scholarship is received. The scholarship funds must be paid to the student's academic institution.
2008
Preview the application and apply. All applications must be submitted by February 28 of each year and include the following:
2024: Ashley Rockenbach (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
2023: Olivija Liepa (New York University and Long Island University)
2022: Sarah Shepherd (Simmons University)
2021: aems emswiler (University of Arizona, School of Information)
2020: Elena Hinkle (Simmons University)
2019: Erin E. Voisin (Louisiana State University)
2018: Julie Botnick (University of California, Los Angeles)
2017: Alexandra M. Wilder (Drexel University)
2016: Katherine Madison (University of Pittsburgh)
2015: Noah Geraci (University of California, Los Angeles)
2014: William J. Levay (Pratt Institute)
2013: Catherine L. Miller (Clayton State University)
2012: Jarrett M. Drake (University of Michigan) AND Nathan Sowry (University of Wisconsin–Madison)
2011: Eric Willey (University of Wisconsin–Madison)
2010: Venus E. Van Ness (State University of New York at Albany)
2009: Andy (Jonathan) Uhrich (New York University)
2008: Emiko Hastings (University of Michigan) AND Becky Robbins (Simmons College)
Established in 1957, the distinction of Fellow—the highest honor bestowed on individuals by SAA—is awarded for outstanding contributions to the organization and to the archives profession. Fellows must demonstrate and represent the highest qualities of the Society as articulated in the Core Values Statement and Code of Ethics.
Our Core Values include:
Access and Use
Accountability
Advocacy
Diversity and Inclusion
History and Memory
Preservation
Professionalism
Responsible Custody
Selection
Service
Social Responsibility
Social Justice
Nominees must demonstrate their “dedication, devotion, and faithfulness to archives and the archival profession.” Quantifying these qualities while also including initiative, resourcefulness, impact, and commitment may not be easy. However, through the process of nomination, we ask colleagues to contemplate and give voice to actions that portray an archivist’s “power to originate,” their “ability to overcome difficulties,” and how they excel in achieving the profession’s core values.
Candidates must qualify, illustrate, and exhibit impact in each of the following qualities/criteria:
Appropriate academic education and professional/technical training in any of the fields of SAA’s interest.
Professional experience in any of the fields of SAA’s objectives for a minimum of seven years, which shall include evidence of professional responsibility and leadership.
Contributions to the profession demonstrating initiative, resourcefulness, and commitment.
Outreach activities, projects, and scholarship of superior quality and usefulness demonstrating broad impact and contributing to the realization of SAA’s core values and strategic objectives.
Contributions to the archives profession through active participation in and efforts on behalf of SAA as well as contributions to the broader archival profession including regional organizations.
Nomination Requirements and Deadline:
All nominations must be completed online by February 28 of each year. Individual members, primary contacts of institutional members, student members, and associate members are eligible to nominate SAA Fellows.
In accordance with the SAA constitution, the total number of Fellows may not exceed five percent of the SAA membership as of the previous annual meeting.
Nominators with questions should contact the Chair of the Selection Committee.
To be elected a Fellow, one must have been a member of the Society in good standing for at least seven (7) years, consecutively or non-consecutively.
Overall recommendations:
Nominations must include a core narrative that provides a persuasive argument of how the nominated individual meets each of the criteria.
The nomination must provide convincing information in each of the qualities/criteria areas, although not all must have similar extent of evidence.
A recitation or list of activities, facts, or publications is not sufficient. Nominators must provide evidence of quality and impact.
At least three, but no more than five, letters of support from individuals who are familiar with the nominee’s work or contributions to the profession. Ideally each letter should address a different aspect of the nominee’s contributions to SAA and/or the profession. Letters may be written by individuals who are not members of SAA, but they must follow these guidelines.
The nominee’s resume or curriculum vitae.
Appropriate academic education and professional/technical training is strongly preferred in any of the fields of SAA’s interest.
Academic education: Please describe academic degrees in fields commonly used by institutions hiring professional archivists, including but not limited to history, public history, political science, library science, or archival administration. Coursework focused on archival competencies within that degree should be noted if it is not a more common degree for which such education would be anticipated to exist. If a nominee has a different degree, but one that is relevant to the content/context of their archival work, the nominator should explain the relevance of that degree (e.g., a degree in the sciences for someone working with scientific archives, a degree in the arts for someone working with performing arts archives, etc.). Individuals with other background or training are eligible for nomination, with the proviso that the nominator must very clearly explain qualifications that demonstrate the archival competency of the nominee.
Professional/technical training: Alternative sources of archival education that are offered by institutions/organizations providing training/educational opportunities with curricula drawing from accepted archival standards/best practices and taught by someone with archival competencies. Examples might include various archival institutes (e.g., Modern Archives Institute, Georgia Archives Institute, Western Archives Institute) and/or online or live workshops offered by SAA or regional archival organizations. (If these are the sole education/training for the individual, note the extent of training involved, e.g., number of events, extent/length of training.)
Professional experience in any of the fields of SAA’s objectives for a minimum of seven years, which shall include evidence of professional responsibility and leadership.
Demonstrable work with archival materials in any of the “core functions” of records management, appraisal/acquisition, arrangement and description, access, preservation, reference, or outreach. Experience need not be entirely “hands-on” and may include management or supervision of archival functions.
The Fellows award is specifically reserved for practicing archivists.[1] SAA has other awards that are more appropriate for those who were/are vendors of archival services/materials, major donors of archival records, researchers/historians/genealogists who have promoted or used archival materials (i.e., J. Franklin Jameson Archival Advocacy Award) or administrators to whom archival programs report, but may not themselves have archival education/competencies, such as the Librarian of Congress, Archivist of the United States, heads of university libraries, state departments of archives and history or departments of libraries and archives, or SAA staff. Additionally, the SAA Council can choose, or it can be suggested to the SAA Council, to honor an individual archivist with a distinguished service award.
Contributions to the profession demonstrating initiative, resourcefulness, and commitment.
Insightful, intellectual, practical contributions that produce long-term impact on archivists and the profession including:
Program oversight, outreach activities, educational services and projects, writing, and scholarship of superior quality and usefulness that:
Contributions to the archives profession through active participation in SAA and innovative or outstanding work on behalf of SAA.
Participating in SAA governance activities including:
And making outstanding contributing to activities on behalf of SAA, including:
See a sample nomination form and support letter (.pdf) here.
Nominations should provide all the information necessary for evaluating the nominee. The evaluation should focus on the quality, quantity, and applicability of the nomination to the criteria. The evaluators should not “fill in” evidence that may be missing. This helps ensure that all nominations are evaluated from a common perspective. Evaluators may or may not personally know or be closely familiar with a nominee and their professional career, so in any given year, those who are on the evaluation committee could influence a decision if factors not included in the nomination are part of the assessment.
Focus of the award is for service to the Society of American Archivists. The nomination needs to demonstrate that the individual has made sufficient contributions to the Society to be named an SAA Fellow. This is an award that honors outstanding contributions through active participation in and efforts on behalf of SAA as well as to the broader archival profession. This is not an award for outstanding contributions to the archival profession nationally or in a region or state without demonstrable contributions to SAA as well. While a nominee’s activities in other venues strengthens the evidence in some of the criteria areas, they do not replace evidence of service in SAA. There are individuals who may be “well-known” but have not participated in the functions and activities of SAA. Such individuals may be appropriate for other awards such as the J. Franklin Jameson Archival Advocacy Award or distinguished recognition from the SAA Council.
Nominations should demonstrate the nominee meets all criteria. The nomination should demonstrate both how the nominee meets criteria as well as explaining the strengths and impact of their contributions. The nomination should not simply list those items, but explain in a clear and compelling manner how they are superior or exceptional. Nominees will likely have more contributions in some areas compared to others; the final decision to approve a nomination should be based on the whole of contributions demonstrating a significant overall contribution, while meeting the requirement of contributions in each criterion.
Letters provided should demonstrate the quality of the nominee’s contributions. Letters may come from a range of individuals including professional colleagues, individuals in other professions or communities, and users who have worked with or benefited from the nominee’s efforts. These letters do not need to be from Fellows, Past Presidents, or those who might be perceived as having status in SAA. The purpose is to demonstrate the quality of the nominee’s contributions, not restate how the individual meets the criteria.
Comparability of assessment. In evaluating each nomination, evaluators should strive to ensure that their assessments are consistent and comparable between nominations. An evaluator’s knowledge of an individual’s career, or their particular area of expertise and professional focus, should not lead to a more (or less) favorable assessment.
Recusal. Evaluators should recuse themselves from evaluating a nomination when they have a direct working relationship or other professional or personal relationship that may be perceived as too close for objectivity. This might include an individual’s supervisors, supervisees, partners in current or recent professional positions, or partners/spouses or other close relatives. Recusal by any member of the evaluation committee is not a negative factor for the evaluation, but reflects the intent to ensure fair evaluation for all.
[1] Practicing archivist includes any role that involves direct involvement with archives, such as managing an archives, working as an archivist, or providing archival education.
[2] Promotional materials include the use of social media tools, such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, etc., to advance the archives profession in innovative and creative ways.
Preview the nomination form and/or create an account to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
Revisions approved by the SAA Council, March 2020.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Sample Nomination_SAA Fellow.pdf | 1.38 MB |
Established in 1982, this award recognizes an outstanding essay dealing with some facet of archival administration, history, theory, and/or methodology that was published during the preceding year in The American Archivist.
Author(s) of an article published in The American Archivist during the preceding year.
The award is funded by the Society of American Archivists Foundation. The Fellows of the Society of American Archivists sponsor this award honoring Ernst Posner, a former state archivist of the Prussian State Archives who emigrated to the United States in 1939 and joined the faculty of the American University. Posner was an SAA Fellow and President as well as author of American State Archives and Archives in the Ancient World.
A certificate and a cash prize of $500.
1983
The Fellows' Ernst Posner Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee is composed of three Fellows of the Society of American Archivists and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). The SAA President-elect shall appoint one member of the subcommittee each year for a term of three years after soliciting nominations from the Fellows Steering Committee. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair and present the award.
All articles appearing in a specific volume of The American Archivist are reviewed by the subcommittee, which selects the award recipient. No nomination or application is made.
2024: Dana Reijerkerk and Caterina M. Reed, "Archives, Decolonization, and the Politics of Tribal Sovereignty: An Examination of Accessibility Barriers to Indigenous Federal Recognition Research in the United States," American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2023, Vol 86.2)
2023: Alston Brake Cobourn, Jen Corrine Brown, Edward Warga, and Lisa Louis, “Toward Metaliteracy and Transliteracy in the History Classroom: A Case Study Among Underserved Students," American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2022, Vol. 85.2)
2022: Eliot Wilczek, “Archival Engagements with Wicked Problems," American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2021, Vol. 84.2)
2021: Katherine Fisher, “Copyright and Preservation of Born-digital Materials: Persistent Challenges and Selected Strategies,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2020, Vol. 83.2)
2020: Keith Pendergrass, Walker Sampson, Tessa Walsh, and Laura Alagna, "Toward Environmentally Sustainable Digital Preservation," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2019, Vol. 82.1)
2019: Jeremy Evans and Melissa Hernández Durán, “Rights Review for Sound Recordings: Strategies Using Risk and Fair Use Assessments,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2018, Vol. 81.2)
2018: Katherine S. Madison, “'Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Tells Your Story': The Use and Representation of Records in Hamilton: An American Musical," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2017, Vol. 80.1)
2017: Michelle Caswell, Marika Cifor, and Mario H. Ramirez, “To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2016, Vol 79.1)
2016: Wendy Duff and Jessica Haskell, “New Uses for Old Records: A Rhizomatic Approach to Archival Access,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2015, Vol. 78, No. 1)
2015: Kit Hughes, “Appraisal as Cartography: Cultural Studies in the Archives,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2014, Vol. 77, No. 1)
2014: Not Awarded
2013: Scott Cline, “’Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You’: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2012, Vol. 75, No. 2)
2012: Douglas Cox, “National Archives and International Conflicts: The Society of American Archivists and War,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2011, Vol. 74, No. 2)
2011: Paul Conway, “Modes of Seeing: Digitized Photographic Archives and the Experienced User,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2010, Vol. 73, No. 2)
2010: Scott Cline, “’To the Limit of our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2009, Vol. 72, No. 2)
2009: Geoffrey Yeo, “Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2008, Vol. 71, No. 1)
2008: Magia Ghetu Krause and Elizabeth Yakel, “Interaction in Virtual Archives: The Polar Bear Expedition Digital Collections Next Generation Finding Aid,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2007, Vol. 70, No. 2)
2007: A*CENSUS Working Group, “Archival Census and Education Needs Survey in the United States,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2006, Vol. 69, No. 2)
2006: Timothy L. Ericson, “Building our Own ‘Iron Curtain’: The Emergence of Secrecy in American Government,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2005, Vol. 68, No. 1)
2005: Elena Danielson, “Privacy Rights and the Rights of Political Victims: Implications of the German Experience,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2004, Vol. 67, No. 2)
2004: George Bolotenko, “Frost on the Walls in Winter: Russian and Ukrainian Archives since the Great Dislocation (1991-1999),” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2003, Vol. 66, No. 2)
2003: James M. O’Toole, “Democracy—and Documents—in America,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2002, Vol. 65, No. 1)
2002: William G. Rosenberg, “Politics in the (Russian) Archives: The ‘Objectivity Question,’ Trust and the Limitations of Law,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2001, Vol. 64, No. 1)
2001: Terry Cook, “’The Imperative of Challenging Absolutes’ in Graduate Archival Education Programs: Issues for Educators and the Profession,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2000, Vol. 63, No. 2)
2000: Philip C. Bantin, “The Indiana University Electronic Records Project Revisited,” American Archivist (Spring 1999, Vol. 62, No. 1)
1999: Peter J. Wosh, "Going Postal," American Archivist (Spring 1998, Vol. 61, No. 1)
1998: Roy Turnbaugh, “Information Technology, Records, and State Archives,” American Archivist (Spring 1997, Vol. 60, No. 2)
1997: Tyler O. Walters, "Contemporary Archival Appraisal Methods and Preservation Decision-Making," American Archivist (Summer 1996, Vol. 59, no. 3)
1996: “Special Issue on Case Studies of the Committee on Automated Records and Techniques,” American Archivist (Spring 1995, Vol. 58, No. 2)
1995: Helen R. Tibbo, “The Epic Struggle: Subject Retrieval from Large Bibliographic Databases," American Archivist ( Spring 1994, Vol. 57, No. 2)
1994: James M. O’Toole, “The Symbolic Significance of Archives,” American Archivist (Spring 1993, Vol. 56, No. 2)
1993: Avra S. Michelson and Jeff Rothenberg, “Scholarly Communication and Information Technology: Exploring the Impact of Changes in the Research Process on Archives,” American Archivist (Spring 1992, Vol. 55, No. 2)
1992: Frederick J. Stielow, “Archival Theory Redux and Redeemed: Definition and Context Toward a General Theory,” American Archivist (Winter 1991, Vol. 54, No. 1)
1991: James M. O’Toole, “Curriculum Development in Archival Education: A Proposal,” American Archivist (Summer 1990, Vol. 53, No. 3)
1990: Working Group on Standards for Archival Description, “Archival Description Standards: Establishing a Process for Their Development and Implementation,” American Archivist (Fall 1989, Vol. 52, No. 4)
1989: Not Awarded
1988: Avra Michelson, “Description and Reference in the Age of Automation,” American Archivist (Spring 1987, Vol. 50, No. 2)
1987: Trudy Huskamp Peterson, “The National Archives and the Archival Theorist Revisited, 1954-1984,” American Archivist (Spring 1986, Vol. 49, No. 2)
1986: Joanne Yates, “Internal Communication Systems in American Business Structures: A Framework to Aid Appraisal,” American Archivist (Spring 1985, Vol. 48, No. 2)
1985: F. Gerald Ham, “Archival Choices: Managing the Historical Record in an Age of Abundance,” American Archivist (Winter 1984, Vol. 47, No. 1)
1984: Frank G. Burke, “Archival Cooperation,” American Archivist (Summer 1983, Vol. 46, No. 3)
1983: Mary Jo Pugh, “The Illusion of Omniscience: Subject Access and the Reference Archivist,” American Archivist (Winter 1982, Vol. 45, No. 1)
Established in 1993, this award recognizes and acknowledges graduate students of color, such as those of African, Asian, Latinx, Middle Eastern/North African, or Native American descent, who, through scholastic and personal achievement, manifest an interest in becoming professional archivists and active members of the Society of American Archivists.
This award supports the Society of American Archivists' Archivists and Archives of Color Section objectives of:
1. Identifying students of color enrolled in postsecondary educational institutions.
2. Encouraging students of color to consider careers in the archival profession.
3. Promoting increased participation in SAA by exposing students of color to the experience of attending national meetings and encouraging them to join and remain members of the organization.
Recipients will be selected based on their submission of a completed application and personal statement/essay. Personal statements/essays will be evaluated based on:
Awarded to students of color, with preference given to full-time students enrolled in a graduate program focusing on archival management during the academic year preceding the date on which the award is given.
Sponsored by the Society of American Archivists' Archivists and Archives of Color Section and funded through the SAA Foundation, the award is named in honor of archival pioneer Harold T. Pinkett, the first African American to be appointed an archivist at the National Archives, where he served for more than 35 years as a specialist in agricultural archives, senior records appraiser, and chief archivist of the Natural Resources Records Branch. A Fellow of SAA, Pinkett served as editor of The American Archivist from 1968 to 1971.
Up to two awards may be given during an awards cycle. Each recipient receives full complimentary registration and related expenses for hotel and travel to attend the SAA Annual Meeting during the year in which the award is received. In addition, each recipient receives a complimentary one-year membership in SAA.
1994
The committee consists of the senior co-chair of the Archivists and Archives of Color Section, one member of the Archivists and Archives of Color Section selected by the chair of the section to serve a one-year term, one SAA member selected by the SAA President-elect to serve a one-year term, and one of the co-chairs of the SAA Awards Committee (ex officio). The Chair of the Archivists and Archives of Color Section shall serve as chair of the subcommittee and shall present the award.
Preview and/or begin the application. All applications must be submitted by February 28 of each year and include the following:
Council Approved Updates: August 2024
2024: Shira Greer (University of North Carolina, MSLS Program)
2023: Zoe Hume (Florida State University, Museum Education and Visitor-Centered Curation Program)
2022: Erin Castillo (San Jose State University, Library and Information Science Program)
2021: Aparna Subramanian (New York University, Moving Image Archiving and Preservation Program)
2020: Carol Ng-He (San José State University)
2019: Angela Osbourne (San José State University) AND Antonia Charlemagne-Marshall (University of West Indies)
2018: Juber Ayala (Rutgers University) AND Jessica Tai (University of California, Los Angeles)
2017: NaVosha Copeland (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) AND Chido Muchemwa (University of Texas at Austin)
2016: Gailyn Lehuanani Bopp (University of Hawai’i at Manoa) AND Karen Li-Lun Hwang (Pratt Institute)
2015: Talia Guzmán-González (University of Maryland, College Park) AND Rachel E. Winston (University of Texas at Austin)
2014: Allan Jason Sarmiento (California State University, Sacramento) AND Raquel Flores-Clemons (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
2013: Lori E. Harris (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) AND Angel Maria Diaz (University of California, Los Angeles)
2012: Kapena Shim (University of Hawai‘i Mānoa)
2011: Kelly E. Lau (University of British Columbia) AND Melvin J. Collier (Clayton State University)
2010: Miranda N. Rivers (Simmons College) AND Vivian Wong (UCLA)
2009: Krystal Appiah (University of California, Los Angeles) AND I-Ting Emily Chu (New York University)
2008: Monique Lloyd (Emporia State University) AND Tiffany-Kay Sangwand (University of California, Los Angeles)
2007: Bergis K. Jules (Indiana University) AND Janel Quirante (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
2006: Lanell James (University of Michigan) AND Shawn Phillip San Roman (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
2005: Jennifer Osorio (University of California, Los Angeles) AND Paul Sevilla (University of California, Los Angeles)
2004: Josué Hurtado (University of Michigan) AND Georgette Mayo (University of South Carolina)
2003: Michelle Baildon (Simmons College)
2002: Petrina D. Jackson (University of Pittsburgh)
2001: Rose Roberto (University of California, Los Angeles)
2000: Not awarded
1999: Teresa Maria Mora (New York University) AND Tywanna Marie Whorley (University of Pittsburgh)
1998: Elenita M. Tapawan (University of Hawaii, Honolulu)
1997: Gloria Meraz (University of Texas at Austin)
1996: Letha Johnson (Washburn University)
1995: Ida E. Jones (Howard University)
1994: Kathryn M. Neal (University of Michigan)
The J. Franklin Jameson Archival Advocacy Award honors an individual, institution, or organization that promotes greater public awareness, appreciation, or support of archival activities or programs. The individual's or institution's contributions may take the form of advocacy, publicity, legislation, financial support, or a similar action that fosters archival work or raises public consciousness of the importance of archival work. Contributions should have broad, long-term impact at the regional level or beyond.
Nominees must be from outside the archives profession.
Individuals directly involved in archival work, either as paid or volunteer staff, or institutions or organizations directly responsible for an archival program are not eligible for this award.
A completed nomination form.
Established in 1989, the award honors J. Franklin Jameson, a noted American historian, former president of the American Historical Association, and long-time advocate for the establishment of a U.S. National Archives. The award is funded by the Society of American Archivists Foundation. Up to three awards may be given each year.
A plaque.
1989
The J. Franklin Jameson Archival Advocacy Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee consists of four members of SAA:
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Dr. Elaine Carey
2023: The West Virginia Feminist Activist Collection (WVFAC) Advisory Team (Christine Weiss Daugherty, Susan Kelley, Dr. Judith Stitzel, and Carroll Wilkinson)
2022: Not Awarded
2021: Not Awarded
2020: Brad Pomerance, CJ Eastman AND Council of Independent Colleges’ Humanities Research for the Public Good Program
2019: Tempestt Hazel AND The Kitchen Sisters (Davia Nelson and Nikki Silva)
2018: Yvonne Lewis Holley AND Brad Meltzer
2017: Environmental Data & Governance Initiative (EDGI)
2016: Lin-Manuel Miranda and Ron Chernow
2015: Adrena Ifill Blagburn
2014: LGBT Center of Central PA History Project AND National History Day
2013: AARP Virginia and Dr. Warren Stewart
2012: Eve Kahn, Bebe Miller, Phillip Stewart
2011: “Who Do You Think You Are?” (NBC)
2010: The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation
2009: Ross King (Georgia Historical Records Advisory Board)
2008: Data-Intensive Cyber Environments (DICE)
2007: The Chicago Tribune (accepted by Debra K. Bade)
2006: U.S. Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada)
2005: George F. Farr, Jr.
2004: Not awarded
2003: Arizona State University
2002: Joan Winters, Louise Addis
2001: Not awarded
2000: Not awarded
1999: John B. Harlan
1998: Newsday
1997: Kraft Foods, Inc.
1996: Richard Benson
1995: Not awarded
1994: Hudson's Bay Company
1993: Thomas D. Clark, Louise McBee, John Marshall
1992: Not awarded
1991: New York State Assembleyman William B. Hoyt and The Mellon Foundation
1990: U.S. Senator Mark O. Hatfield (R-Oregon)
1989: U.S. Senator Thomas F. Eagleton (D-Missouri)
The Josephine Forman Scholarship provides financial support to minority students pursuing graduate education in archival science, encourages students to pursue a career as an archivist, and promotes the diversification of the American archives profession. The scholarship is given to applicants who demonstrate excellent potential for scholastic and personal achievement and who manifest a commitment both to the archives profession and to advancing diversity concerns within it.
Established in October 2010 by the General Commission on Archives and History of The United Methodist Church and named for Josephine Forman, archivist for 18 years of the Southwest Texas Conference of the United Methodist Church and author of We Finish to Begin: A History of Travis Park United Methodist Church, 1846–1991.
*The graduate program or multi-course program must offer at least three courses in archival science or be listed in the current SAA Directory of Archival Education. The applicant must provide proof of the three-course standard by submitting copies of course descriptions from the institution’s current course catalog.
The General Commission on Archives and History (GCAH) of The United Methodist Church, in cooperation with the Society of American Archivists and the SAA Foundation.
The Forman Scholarship Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee consists of three members of the Society of American Archivists, one GCAH staff member, and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). The SAA President-elect shall appoint one of the SAA members on the subcommittee each year for a term of three years; the senior member of this cohort in years of service shall serve as chair and present the award.
One scholarship of $10,000. Awardees also may be invited to attend the annual meeting of the General Commission on Archives and History and/or the Quadrennial Historical Convocation, with funding provided by GCAH.
Also included is complimentary registration to the SAA Annual Meeting in the year in which the scholarship is received.
2011
Click here to preview the application and/or to apply. All applications must be submitted by February 28 of each year and include the following:
In the event that certain conditions arise, the following shall apply: 1) if the award exceeds tuition fees for one semester, the balance may be carried over to the next semester; 2) if the recipient drops out of the archival administration program, all unused fees shall be returned to GCAH; and 3) if the recipient’s tuition is paid in full by another scholarship or award, the recipient shall decline the Forman Scholarship.
2024: Federica Alesiani (University of Washington)
2023: Hannah Gershone (Simmons University)
2022: Elias Larralde (University of Arizona)
2021: Hinaikawaihiʻilei Keala (University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa)
2020: Ishmael Ross (Louisiana State University)
2019: Ashley Flores (University of California, Los Angeles)
2018: Krystell Jimenez (University of California, Los Angeles)
2017: Jeannie Chen (University of California, Los Angeles)
2016: Desiree Alaniz (Simmons College)
2015: Maria E. Sanchez-Tucker (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee)
2014: Joanna Chen (University of California, Los Angeles)
2013: Kimberly Springer (University of Michigan)
2012: Nathasha Alvarez
2011: Nidya G. Gonzalez
The Mark A. Greene Emerging Leader Award celebrates and encourages early-career archivists who have completed archival work of broad merit, demonstrated significant promise of leadership, and/or performed commendable service to the archives profession. The award is given based on the total experience of the awardee, including knowledge, leadership, participation, and/or achievements in the profession.
Nominees must be SAA members and will have more than two years and less than ten years of professional archives experience. Nominees must meet as many of the following criteria as possible:
Created in 2011 and renamed in 2017, the award honors SAA Fellow and Past President Mark A. Greene for his long-standing commitment to mentoring young leaders.
A certificate.
2012
The Mark A. Greene Emerging Leader Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee consists of three members of SAA and one of the co-chairs of the SAA Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year and include the following:
Updates Approved by Council: August 2024
2024: Not awarded
2023: Catheryne Popovitch (Illinois State Archives)
2022: Sara Davis (Wyoming State Archives)
2021: Dorothy Berry (Harvard University, Houghton Library)
2020: Lydia Tang (Michigan State University)
2019: Wendy Hagenmaier (Georgia Institute of Technology)
2018: Harrison Inefuku (Iowa State University)
2017: Natalie Baur, El Colegio de México
2016: Matt Gorzalski, Southern Illinois University Carbondale
2015: Cheryl Oestreicher, Boise State University
2014: Beth Shields, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
2013: Tanya Marshall
2012: Mark Matienzo
The Mosaic Scholarship provides financial and mentoring support to students of color pursuing graduate education in archival science, encourages students to pursue a career as an archivist, and promotes the diversification of the American archives profession. The award is given to applicants who demonstrate excellent potential for scholastic and personal achievement and who manifest a commitment both to the archives profession and to advancing diversity concerns within it. Established by the SAA Council in August 2008 to advance SAA's Diversity Strategic Priority.
The applicant:
In the event that certain conditions arise, the following shall apply: 1) if the award exceeds tuition fees for one semester, the balance may be carried over to the next semester; 2) if the recipient drops out of the archival administration program, all unused fees shall be returned to SAA; and 3) if the recipient’s tuition is paid in full by another scholarship or award, the recipient shall decline the Mosaic Scholarship.
The Society of American Archivists and the Society of American Archivists Foundation.
The Mosaic Scholarship Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee is composed of six members of the Society of American Archivists and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). Two of the six members are appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve three-year terms. One of these appointees shall be a previous Mosaic Scholarship recipient. The chair of the subcommittee is appointed annually by the President-elect from among the third-year members. The President-elect's appointments shall be made in consultation with the chairs of the SAA Diversity Committee, the Archivists and Archives of Color Roundtable, and the Archival Educators Roundtable.
As the SAA and SAA Foundation budgets permit, up to two scholarships of $5,000 each. In addition, each scholarship recipient receives a one-year complimentary membership in the Society of American Archivists and complimentary registration to the Society’s Annual Meeting for the year in which the scholarship is received.
2009
Click here to preview the application and/or to apply. All applications must be submitted by February 28 of each year and include the following:
2024: Sage Innerarity (Simmons University)
2023: Dharani Persaud (University of British Columbia)
2022: Sean Payne (Syracuse University)
2021: Christopher Castro (University of California, Los Angeles)
2020: Mya Ballin (University of British Columbia)
2019: Lisle Pino (San Jose State University)
2018: Alexis Recto (University of California, Los Angeles)
2017: Jessica Tai AND Sabrina Ponce (University of California, Los Angeles)
2016: Jimmy Zavala (University of California, Los Angeles)
2015: Desiree Alaniz (Simmons College)
2014: Rebecca Nieto (McGill University) AND Maria E. Sanchez-Tucker (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)
2013: Barrye Brown (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) AND Rhonda Jones (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
2012: Aditi Sharma Worcester (University of Texas at Austin)
2011: Rose Chou (San Jose State University) AND Helen Kim (University of Texas at Austin)
2010: LaNesha DeBardelaben (Indiana University-Bloomington) AND Susan Gehr (San Jose State University)
2009: Janet Ceja (University of Pittsburgh) AND Harrison Inefuku (University of British Columbia)
Established in 1979, this award enables international archivists, who are currently training or studying in the United States or Canada, to augment their experience by traveling to the Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archivists.
Applications are evaluated based on archivists who are not U.S. or Canadian citizens or permanent residents.
Funded by the Society of American Archivists Foundation. The award is named in honor of Oliver Wendell Holmes, who joined the National Archives staff in 1935 and served in many capacities, including that of executive director of the National Historical Publications Commission. Holmes was a Fellow of the Society of American Archivists and served as SAA's fourteenth president in 1958–1959.
The committee is composed of three members of the Society and one of the co-chairs of the SAA Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair.
A certificate and a cash award of $1,000.
1979
Click here to preview the application and/or to apply. All applications must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Jiarui Sun (China)
2023: Matthew Yang (Singapore)
2022: Chaeyeon Kim (South Korea)
2021: Jiarui Sun (China)
2020: Klavier Jie Ying Wang (China)
2019: Not awarded
2018: Tianjiao Qi (China)
2017: No applicants
2016: Tristan Triponez (Switzerland)
2015: Mary Grace Golfo (Philippines)
2014: Not awarded
2013: Weimei Pan (China)
2012: Georgia Barlaoura (Greece) and Lara Mancuso (Brazil)
2011: Patrick Ansah (Ghana) and Umi Asma’ Mokhtar (Malaysia)
2010: Elaine Goh (British Columbia, Canada)
2009: Ricardo L. Punzalan (Philippines)
2008: Not awarded
2007: Gerald Chaudron (New Zealand)
2006: Not awarded
2005: Not awarded
2004: Bart Ballaux (Belgium)
2003: Ji-Hyun Kim (Korea)
2002: Not awarded
2001: Eun G. Park (Korea)
2000: Zhou Xiaomu (China)
1999: Ciaran Trace (Ireland)
1998: Ntombizandile Kwatsha (South Africa)
1997: Liu Yunming (China)
1996: In support of an International Reception
1995: Not awarded
1994: Not awarded
1993: Not awarded
1992: Veronika Emlerova (Czechoslovakia)
1991: Julie Stacker (Australia)
1990: Samuel Njovana (Zimbabwe)
1989: Valerii Leonov (USSR)
1988: Ann Pederson (Australia), Jan E.A. Boomgaard (The Netherlands), Alan Ives (Australia)
1987: Jan E.A. Boomgaard (The Netherlands), Darwin Matthews (Australia), Gordon Read, Peter Sigmond (The Netherlands)
1986: Joan VanAlbada (The Netherlands), Michael Roper (Great Britain), Michael Dreyfus, Charles Kecskemeti (France), Alvan Ives (Australia), Egart Anderson (The Netherlands), Luciana Duranti (Italy), Peter Sigmond (The Netherlands), Maryna Fraser
1985: Luciana Duranti (Italy), Maria Luisa Acuna (Mexico), Amanda Rosales (Mexico)
1984: Alvan Ives (Australia), Aauel Polka Toe (Liberia)
1983: Stuart Strachan (New Zealand)
1982: Egart Anderson (The Netherlands)
1981: Zhang Tien-ming (China)
1980: Not awarded
1979: Steve Mwiyeriwa (Malawi)
This Philip M. Hamer and Elizabeth Hamer Kegan Award recognizes an archivist, editor, group of individuals, or institution that has increased public awareness of a specific body of documents (which can be a specific archival collection or thematic aggregation) through compilation, transcription, exhibition, or public presentation of archives or manuscript materials for educational, instructional, or other public purpose. Work that has impact on a local, regional, national, and/or international level is welcomed. Nominee(s) should meet one or more of the following criteria and provide supporting documentation as evidence:
Project was/is achieved through compilation, transcription, exhibition, or public presentation of archives or manuscript materials that go above and beyond conventional archival processing / arrangement and description work.
Project effectively raises public awareness of a specific body of archival or manuscript documents (may include photos, films, etc.).
Project has clear educational, instructional, or other public purpose with evidence provided of the impact of the educational/instructional work, etc.
Individual archivists and editors, groups of individuals, organizations. This award is open to nominees within and outside of the United States, and is not limited to SAA members.
The Society of American Archivists Foundation, with the cash prize underwritten by a fund first established by Elizabeth Hamer Kegan in 1973. The award honors two SAA Fellows and past presidents. Elizabeth Hamer Kegan was appointed Assistant Librarian of Congress in 1963, where she directed information, exhibits, publications, and international visitors' programs and shepherded the American Revolution Bicentennial Program. Her late husband, Philip M. Hamer, was a historian who served successively as head of the Library, Accessions, Reference, and Records Control divisions of the National Archives, and was the first executive director of the National Historical Publications Commission. He was the author of A Guide to Archives and Manuscripts in the United States (1961). The award was modified in 1987, 1991, and 2017.
A certificate and a cash prize of $500.
The Hamer-Kegan Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee is composed of three members of the Society of American Archivists and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA Vice President to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as chair.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library Archives Research Center
Honorable Mention to La Florida: The Interactive Digital Archive of the Americas
2023: Dr. William Fliss
2022: San Diego Air and Space Museum
2021: California State University Japanese American Digitization Project
2020: Laura Wagner
2019: Dickinson College Archives and Special Collections for Carlisle Indian School Digital Resource Center
2018: Find & Connect, eScholarship Research Centre
2017: The Center for Home Movies
2016: South Asian American Digital Archive
2015: The Legacy Center, Drexel University College of Medicine
2014: Emma Goldman Papers Project
2013: Densho: The Japanese American Legacy Project
2012: Immigration History Research Center, University of Minnesota
2011: March On Milwaukee Civil Rights History Project team (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee Libraries)
2010: Giza Archives at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
2009: Ward M. Canaday Center for Special Collections of the University of Toledo
2008: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and the CBC Digital Archives (Les archives de Radio-Canada)
2007: National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science
2006: The State Library and Archives of Florida's Florida Folklife Digitization and Education Project
2005: Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation
2004: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
2003: New York State Archives Partnership Trust
2002: Vermont State Archives
2001: Shelly Henley Kelly
2000: Jeffrey D. Marshall, A War of the People: Vermont Civil War Letters
1999: Delaware Public Archives
1998: Linda A. Ries
1997: Minnesota Historical Society
1996: Julie Daniels, Judy Hohmann, Jean West
1995: New York Public Library
1994: American Heritage Center at University of Wyoming
1993: Carl Albert Center at University of Oklahoma
1992: Elaine Forman Crane, Northeastern University Press
1991: James D. Folts, Larry Hackman, Judy Hohmann
1990: Judy Hohmann
1989: Jane Doerr
1988: Nancy Bartlett, Kathleen Koehler
1987: Robert E. Bailey, Elaine S. Evans
1986: Not awarded
1985: Claude-Ann Lopez
1984: David Wilson
1983: Robert E. McCarthy
1982: Mary Dix
1981: Sharon Macpherson
1980: Linda J. Pike
1979: Raymond W. Smock
1978: Philander D. Chase
1977: Dorothy Twohig
1976: Charles F. Hobson
1975: Harold Dean Moser
1974: David W. Hirst
1973: Patricia A. Clark
The Preservation Publication Award recognizes the author(s) or editor(s) of an outstanding published work related to archives preservation and, through this acknowledgment, encourages outstanding achievement by others. Submissions may address topics related to digital preservation as well as analog preservation. The work can be an article, report, chapter, or monograph in an audiovisual, digital, or print format.
The work must contribute to the advancement of the theory and practice of preservation in archives institutions by introducing new preservation theories, methods, or techniques; by codifying principles and practices of archives preservation; by presenting the results of innovative research on matters related to archives preservation; by investigating preservation issues of current interest and importance to the archives community; or by studying aspects of the history of the archives profession. Submissions may address topics related to digital preservation as well as analog preservation
The award was established in 1993 by SAA's Preservation Section.
Awarded to the author(s) or editor(s) of an outstanding preservation-related work that is of relevance to the North American archives community and published during the preceding calendar year.
A completed nomination form and the required number of copies of the work.
The Society of American Archivists.
A certificate and a cash prize of $750.
1994
The Preservation Publication Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee consists of four members of the Society of American Archivists (one of whom shall be the current chair of the Preservation Section, who shall serve a term concurrent with his or her office) and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). One of the remaining members shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as chair.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
Council Approved Updates: August 2024
2024: Not awarded
2023: Not awarded
2022: "Balancing Care and Authenticity in Digital Collections: A Radical Empathy Approach To Working With Disk Images" by Monique Lassere and Jess Whyte in Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies vol. 3 (2021)
Special Commendation: “The Impact of Climate Change on Canadian Archives” by Amanda Oliver in Records Management Journal vol. 31
2021: OSSArcFlow Guide to Documenting Born-Digital Archival Workflows by Alexandra Chassanoff and Colin Post(Educopia Institute, 2020)
Special Commendation: “What's Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners' Perspectives” by Karl-Rainer Blumenthal, Peggy Griesinger, Julia Kim, Shira Peltzman, and Vicky Steeves in Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies vol. 7
2020: Preventive Conservation: Collection Storage by Lisa Elkin and Christopher A. Norris (the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections, The American Institute for Conservation, the Smithsonian Institution, and the George Washington University Museum Studies Program, 2019)
2019: The No-Nonsense Guide to Born-Digital Content by Heather Bowden and Walker Sampson (Facet, 2018)
2018: "The Whole Story: News Agency Photographs in Newspaper Photo Morgue Collections" by Laura McCann, American Archivist 80.1 (Spring/Summer 2017)
2017: Waters Rising: Letters from Florence by Sheila Waters (The Legacy Press, 2016)
2016: Preserving Our Heritage: Perspectives from Antiquity to the Digital Age by Michele V. Cloonan
2015: From Theory to Action: “Good Enough” Digital Preservation Solutions for Under-Resourced Cultural Heritage Institutions by the Digital POWRR Team
Special Commendation: 2015 National Agenda for Digital Stewardship by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance
2014: Archivists' Guide to Archiving Video, published by WITNESS
2013: Aligning National Approaches to Digital Preservation, edited by Nancy Y. McGovern (volume editor) and Katherine Skinner (series editor)
2012: Geospatial Multistate Archive and Preservation Partnership (GeoMAPP) Best Practices for Archival Processing for Geospatial Datasets
2011: Digital Curation: A How-To-Do-It Manual by Ross Harvey
2010: Archival and Special Collections Facilities: Guidelines for Archivists, Librarians, Architects, and Engineers, edited by Michele F. Pacifico and Thomas P. Wilsted
2009: The AIC Guide to Digital Photography and Conservation Documentation
2008: Science and Technology Council of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, The Digital Dilemma
2007: Heritage Preservation, Field Guide to Emergency Response
2006: Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group
2005: National Film Preservation Foundation, The Film Preservation Guide: The Basics for Archives, Libraries, and Museums
2004: Anne R. Kenney, Nancy Y. McGovern, Digital Preservation Management: Implementing Short-term Strategies for Long-term Problems (Web-based tutorial)
2003: Not awarded
2002: Robert E. Schnare, Jr., Bibliography of Preservation Literature, 1983-1996
2001: Gregory S. Hunter, Preserving Digital Information: A How-To-Do-It Manual
2000: Eléonore Kissel and Erin Vigneau, Architectural Photoreproductions: A Manual for Identification and Care
1999: James M. Reilly, The Storage Guide for Color Photographic Materials
1998: Not awarded
1997: Preserving Digital Information: Report on the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information
1996: Anne R. Kenney, Stephen Chapman, Tutorial - Digital Resolution Requirements for Replacing Text Based Material: Methods for Benchmarking Image Quality
1995: Nancy E. Elkington, RLG Archives and Microfilming Manual
1994: Mary Lynn Ritzenthaler, Preserving Archives and Manuscripts
The Sister M. Claude Lane, O.P., Memorial Award was created in 1974 and recognizes an individual who has made a significant contribution to the field of religious archives. Selection criteria include:
Individual archivists only.
A completed nomination form.
Named in honor of Sister M. Claude Lane, O.P., the first professionally trained archivist at the Catholic Archives of Texas in Austin, who served there from 1960 until her death in 1974. The award is funded by the Society of Southwest Archivists.
A certificate and a cash prize.
The Sister M. Claude Lane, O.P., Memorial Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee is composed of four members of SAA, at least one of whom is also a member of the Society of Southwest Archivists (SSA). In addition, one of the co-chairs of the SAA Awards Committee serves ex officio on the subcommittee. The SAA President-elect shall appoint one member of the subcommittee each year for a term of three years after having solicited nominations from the president of the SSA and from the Awards Committee co-chairs. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Thomas J. McCullough, assistant archivist for the Moravian Archives
2023: Russell Gasero, archivist for the Reformed Church in America (retired)
2022: Carol W. Smith, archivist for Christ Church Preservation Trust
2021: Mary Grace Kosta, congregational archivist for the Sisters of St. Joseph in Canada
2020: Ellen Pierce, archival consultant, Dominican Sisters and other Religious Congregations
2019: Jillian Ewalt, Marian Librray, University of Dayton
2018: Sister Louise Grundish, Sisters of Charity in Greensburg, Pennsylvania
2017: Wesley W. Wilson, Roy O. West Library, DePauw University
2016: Denise “Dee” Gallo, Daughters of Charity in Emmitsburg, Maryland
2015: Diane Wells, Episcopal Diocese of Olympia in Seattle
2014: Judi Fergus, Arthur Moore Methodist Museum, Library and Archives
2013: Audrey Newcomer, Director, Archives and Records, Archdiocese of St. Louis
2012: Mark J. Duffy
2011: Malachy R. McCarthy
2010: Sister Jane Aucoin, CSJ
2009: Robert Johnson-Lally
2008: Mark Thiel
2007: Roger M. Dahl
2006: Not awarded
2005: William Sumners
2004: John (Jac) Treanor
2003: Theresa (Terry) Thompson
2002: Not awarded
2001: Kinga Perzynska
2000: Not awarded
1999: Not awarded
1998: Charles Nolan
1997: Not awarded
1996: Sister Blaithin Sullivan, CSJ
1995: Brother Roy Godwin, CFA
1994: Sister Emma Cecilia Busam, OSU
1993: Peter Wosh
1992: Sister Mary Linus Bax, CPPS
1991: Elizabeth Yakel
1990: Thomas Wilsted
1989: Not awarded
1988: Brother Denis Sennett, Franciscan Friars of Atonement
1987: Robert Shuster
1986: James M. O'Toole
1985: Rev. Charles Rehkopf
1984: Rev. Norbert Brockman
1983: Not awarded
1982: Barbara Smith
1981: Not awarded
1980: Sister Evangeline Thomas, CSJ
1979: Sister Felicitas Powers, RSM
1978: Lynn May and William Miller
1977: V. Nelle Bellamy
1976: August Sueflow
1975: Eleanore Cammack
1974: Melvin Gingerich
The Spotlight Award recognizes the contributions of individuals who work for the good of the archives profession and of archival collections, and whose work would not typically receive public recognition. The nominee(s) should have achieved distinction in one or more of the following ways:
Awarded to an individual archivist or a group of up to five archivists who have collaborated on a project. Preference is given to archivists working in smaller repositories, especially those without institutional support for professional activities.
Established in 2005, the award is funded by the Society of American Archivists Foundation.
A certificate and complimentary registration for the individual recipient or group (of up to five individuals) to the SAA Annual Meeting occurring in the year in which the award is presented.
The Spotlight Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee consists of three members of the Society of American Archivists and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA Vice President to serve a three-year term. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair.
Click here to preview the nomination form and/or to start a nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2023: Emily Pfotenhauer, former digital strategist and grants manager at Wisconsin Library Services (WiLS)
2022: Georgina Tom, archivist at the 'Iolani School
2021: Lee Price, a fundraising professional who specializes in grant writing for cultural institutions
2020: Michelle Ganz, archives director at the McDonough Innovation
2019: Kelli Luchs (Las Vegas News Bureau archivist, Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority) and Ilana Short (former manager of photography collections, Nevada State Museum)
2018: Bernetiae Reed, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2017: No applicants
2016: Marie Lascu, archivist for Crowing Rooster Arts in New York City and co-founder of Activist Archivists (2011–2015)
2015: Anne Ostendarp, multimedia archivist for the Knights of Columbus and a consulting and project archivist
2014: Kate Theimer, Spontaneous Scholarship Program
2013: Terry Brown, volunteer archivist, Houston Symphony and Museum of Fine Arts, Houston
2012: Cindy Ditzler and Joan Metzger
2011: Teresa Kiser
2010: Ann Russell
2009: Not awarded
2008: The staff of Afghan Film
2007: Alan Harris Stein, Chicago Oral History Roundtable for service as “Katrina Relief Librarian”
2006: Emilie Leumas
The Theodore Calvin Pease Award recognizes superior writing achievements by students of archival studies. Entries are judged on innovation, scholarship, pertinence, and clarity of writing. Papers examining major trends and issues in the archives profession are preferred.
Created in 1987 (and modified in 2007 and 2012), this award honors Theodore Calvin Pease, the first editor of American Archivist, the journal of the Society of American Archivists.
Eligible entries are written by students enrolled in archival studies classes at either the master’s or doctoral level. A faculty member or instructor associated with the archival studies program must submit the entry to verify that the student paper was written within the context of an archival studies program and completed during the preceding calendar year. A faculty member or instructor in an archival studies program may submit one entry per award cycle. There is no cap on the number of papers than can be submitted by a school or program, provided no individual faculty member submits more than one paper.
Entries should be unpublished manuscripts of 5,000–8,000 words, must include an abstract, and should conform to the stylistic guidelines described in the editorial policy ofAmerican Archivist. Submit only the title with the paper. The name of the author, the program, or the faculty member or instructor must not appear on the manuscript.
The Society of American Archivists Foundation.
A certificate and cash prize of $250. The winning manuscript, after going through the editorial process with the editor of American Archivist, will be published in American Archivist.
1988
Papers will be judged in a blind review by the Pease Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee. The subcommittee consists of the editor of American Archivist (who also serves as chair), the vice chair of the Committee on Education, and a member of the Society of American Archivists with experience in archival research and literature appointed annually by the president-elect to serve a one-year term. The editor of American Archivist also edits the manuscript and leads the student through the editorial process in preparation for publication.
Preview the form and start your nomination. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Not awarded
2023: Sony Prosper (University of Michigan), "Conceptualizing Records: Black Bottom Archives, Detroit Sound Conservancy, Faulkner Morgan Archive, Hula Preservation Society, and History Project," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2024, Vol. 87, No 1)
2022: Not awarded
2021: Ferrin Evans (University of Toronto), “Love (and Loss) in the Time of COVID-19: Translating Trauma into an Archives of Embodied Immediacy,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2022, Vol. 85, No. 1)
2020: Bridget Malley (University of Wisconsin Milwaukee), "Documenting Disability History in Western Pennsylvania," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2021, Vol. 84, No. 1)
2019: Emily Larson (University of British Columbia), "Big Questions: Digital Preservation of Big Data in Government," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2020, Vol. 83, No. 1)
2018: Not awarded
2017: Anna Robinson-Sweet (Simmons College School of Library and Information Science), “Truth and Reconciliation: Archivists as Reparations Activists,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2018, Vol. 81, No. 1)
2016: Rachel Walton (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), “Looking for Answers: A Usability Study of Online Finding Aid Navigation,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2017, Vol. 80, No. 1)
2015: Paige Hohmann (University of British Columbia), “On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to the Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2016, Vol. 79, No. 1)
2014: Joshua D. Hager (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), "To Like or Not to Like: Understanding and Maximizing the Utility of Archival Outreach on Facebook," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2015, Vol. 78, No. 1)
2013: Alex H. Poole (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), "The Strange Career of Jim Crow Archives: Race, Space and History in the Mid-Twentieth-Century American South," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2014, Vol. 77, No. 1)
2012: Pam Mayer (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) "Like a Box of Chocolates: A Case Study of User-Contributed Content at Footnote," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2013, Vol. 76, No. 1)
2011: Lora J. Davis (University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee), "Providing Virtual Services to All: A Mixed-Method Analysis of the Web Site Accessibility of Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries (PACSCL) Member Repositories," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2012, Vol. 75, No. 1)
2010: Emily Monks-Leeson (University of Toronto), "Archives on the Internet: Representing Contexts and Provenance from Repository to Website,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2011, Vol. 74, No. 1)
2009: Kathleen Fear (University of Michigan), "User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2010, Vol. 73, No. 1)
2008: Mary Samouelian (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), "Embracing Web 2.0: Archives and the Newest Generation of Web Applications," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2009, Vol. 72, No. 1)
2007: Elizabeth Snowden (Middle Tennessee State University), "Our Archives, Our Selves: Documentation Strategy and the Re-Appraisal of Professional Identity," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2008, Vol. 71, No. 1)
2006: Ben Blake (University of Pittsburgh), "A Call for a New American Labor Archives: History, Theory, Methodology and Practice," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2007, Vol. 70, No. 1)
2005: Ian Craig Breaden (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), “Sound Practices: Online Audio Exhibits and the Culture Heritage Archive,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2006, Vol. 69, No. 1)
2004: Catherine O'Sullivan (New York University), "Diaries, Online Diaries, and the Future Loss to Archives; or Blogs and the Blogging Bloggers Who Blog Them," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2003, Vol. 68, No. 1)
2003: Glenn Dingwall (University of British Columbia), "Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith,” American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2004, Vol. 67, No. 1)
2002: Reto Tschan (University of British Columbia), "A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal,” American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2002, Vol. 65, No. 2)
2001: James M. Roth (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), "Serving Up EAD: An Exploratory Study on the Deployment and Utilization of Encoded Archival Description Finding Aids," American Archivist (Fall/Winter 2001, Vol. 64, No. 2)
2000: Kristin E. Martin (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), "Analysis of Remote Reference Correspondence at a Large Academic Manuscripts Collection," American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2001, Vol. 64, No. 1)
1999: Kathleen Feeney (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), "Retrieval of Archival Finding Aids Using World Wide Web Search Engines," American Archivist (Fall 1999, Vol. 62, No. 2)
1998: Not awarded
1997: Karen Collins (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), "Providing Subject Access to Images: A Study of User Queries," American Archivist (Spring 1998, Vol. 61, No. 1)
1996: Shauna McRanor (University of British Columbia), "A Critical Analysis of Intrinsic Value," American Archivist (Fall 1996, Vol. 59, No. 4)
1995: Judith Panitch (State University of New York at Albany), "Liberty, Equality, Posterity?: Some Archival Lessons from the Case of the French Revolution," American Archivist (Winter 1996, Vol. 59, No. 1)
1994: Anke Voss-Hubbard (State University of New York at Albany), "No Documents--No History: Mary Ritter Beard and the Early History of Women's Archives," American Archivist (Winter 1995, Vol. 58, No. 2)
1993: Not awarded
1992: Roy Schaeffer (University of British Columbia), "Transcendent Concepts: Power, Appraisal, and the Archivist as Social Context," American Archivist (Fall 1991, Vol. 55, No 4)
1991: Not awarded
1990: Luke J. Gilliland-Swetland (University of Michigan), "The Provenance of a Profession: The Permanence of the Public Archives and Historical Manuscripts Traditions in American Archival History," American Archivist (Spring 1991, Vol. 54, No. 2)
1989: Maureen A. Jung (California State University, Sacramento), "Documenting 19th-Century Quartz Mining in Northern California," American Archivist (Summer 1990, Vol. 53, No. 3)
1988: Greg Kinney (University of Michigan), "The Records of Land District Offices of the U.S. General Land Office for the States of the Northwest Territory," American Archivist (Spring 1989, Vol. 52, No. 2)
Created in 1959, this prize encourages and rewards writing of superior excellence and usefulness in the field of archival history, theory, or practice.
Monographs or documentary publications in print or digital editions first published in English during the preceding calendar year are eligible. Periodicals are not eligible.
A completed nomination form and THREE copies of the publication.
The Society of American Archivists Foundation, in honor of Waldo Gifford Leland, who authored the landmark Guide to the Archives of the Government of the United States in Washington (1904), was active in the organization of the Conference of Archivists in 1909, played a central role in the establishment of the U.S. National Archives, and served two terms as SAA President during the 1940s.
A certificate and cash prize of $1,000.
1959
The Leland Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee consists of three members of the Society of American Archivists and one of the co-chairs of the Awards Committee (ex officio). One member of the subcommittee shall be appointed each year by the SAA President-elect for a term of three years. The senior member of the subcommittee in years of service shall serve as its chair.
Preview and/or start the nomination form. All nominations must be submitted by February 28 of each year.
2024: Eira Tansey, A Green New Deal for Archives (Council on Library and Information Resources, 2023)
2023: James Lowry, Disputed Archival Heritage (Routledge, 2022)
2022: Jason Lustig, A Time to Gather (Oxford University Press, 2021)
2021: Cheryl Oestreicher, Reference and Access for Archives and Manuscripts (Society of American Archivists, 2020)
2020: Jean-Christophe Cloutier, Shadow Archives: The Lifecycles of African American Literature (Columbia University Press, 2019)
2019: Trevor Owens, The Theory and Craft of Digital Preservation (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018)
2018: Anthony Cocciolo, Moving Image and Sound Collections for Archivists (Society of American Archivists, 2017)
2017: Phil Bantin, Building Trustworthy Digital Repositories: Theory and Implementation (Rowman and Littlefield, 2016)
2016: Sonja Luehrmann, Religion in Secular Archives: Soviet Atheism and Historical Knowledge (Oxford University Press, 2015)
2015: Michelle Caswell, Archiving the Unspeakable: Silence, Memory, and the Photographic Record in Cambodia (University of Wisconsin Press, 2014)
2014: Ellen Gruber Garvey, Writing with Scissors: American Scrapbooks from the Civil War to the Harlem Renaissance (Oxford University Press, 2013)
2013: Astrid M. Eckert, The Struggle for the Files: The Western Allies and the Return of German Archives after the Second World War (Cambridge University Press, 2012)
2012: Francis X. Blouin, Jr., and William G. Rosenberg, Processing the Past: Contesting Authority in History and the Archives (Oxford University Press, 2011)
2011: Dr. Laura A. Millar, Archives: Principles and Practices (Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2010)
2010: Karen D. Paul, Glenn R. Gray, and L. Rebecca Johnson Melvin, An American Political Archives Reader (Scarecrow Press, 2009)
2009: Philip C. Bantin, Understanding Data and Information Systems for Recordkeeping (Neal Schuman Publishers, 2008)
2008: Deidre Simmons, Keepers of the Record: The History of the Hudson’s Bay Company Archives (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2007)
2007: Waverly Lowell and Tawny Ryan Nelb, Architectural Records: Managing Design and Construction Records (Society of American Archivists, 2006)
2006: Mary Jo Pugh, Providing Reference Services for Archives and Manuscripts (Society of American Archivists, 2005)
2005: Richard J. Cox, No Innocent Deposits: Forming Archives by Rethinking Appraisal (Scarecrow Press, 2004)
2004: Gregory S. Hunter, Developing and Maintaining Practical Archives: A How-To-Do-It Manual (Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2003)
2003: Joan Echtenkamp Klein, “Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collection" Website
2002: Richard J. Cox, Managing Records for Evidence and Information (Quorum Books, 2001)
2001: Anne R. Kenney and Oya Y. Rieger, Moving Theory into Practice: Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives (Research Libraries Group, 2000)
2000: Charles Dollar, Authentic Electronic Records: Strategies for Long-Term Access (Cohasset Associates, 1999); Certificate of Commendation: Patricia Kennedy Grimsted, Archives of Russia: A Directory and Bibliographic Guide to Holdings in Moscow and St. Petersburg (Routledge, 1997).
1999: Not awarded
1998: James. M. O'Toole, The Records of American Business (Society of American Archivists, 1997)
1997: Anne Kenney and Stephan Chapman, Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives (Cornell University Library, 1996)
1996: Charles H. Lesser, South Carolina Begins: The Records of a Proprietary Colony, 1663–1721 (South Carolina Department of Archives and History, 1995)
1995: Joan D. Krizack, Documentation Planning for the U.S. Health Care System (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)
1994: F. Gerald Ham, Selecting and Appraising Archives and Manuscripts (Society of American Archivists, 1993)
1993: Helen W. Samuels; Varsity Letters: Documenting Modern Colleges and Universities (Society of American Archvists and Scarecrow Press, 1992). Certificate of Commendation: Charles Dollar
1992: Thomas Wilsted and William M. Nolte, Managing Archival and Manuscript Repositories (Society of American Archivists, 1991)
1991: Richard J. Cox, American Archival Analysis: The Recent Development of the Archival Profession in the United States (Scarecrow Press, 1990); Marie B. Allen and Michael Miller, The Intergovernmental Records Project Phase 1 Report (1990)
1990: Henry P. Beers, French and Spanish Records of Louisiana: A Bibliographic Guide to Archive and Manuscript Sources (Louisiana State University Press, 1989)
1989: Not awarded
1988: Nancy E. Gwinn, Preservation Microfilming: A Guide for Librarians and Archivists (American Library Association, 1989)
1987: Frederick J. Stielow, The Management of Oral History Sound Archives (Greenwood Press, 1986)
1986: John Barton and Johanna Wellheiser, An Ounce of Prevention (Scarecrow Press, 1985)
1985: John Fleckner, Native American Archives: An Introduction (Society of American Archivists, 1984)
1984: Richard C. Berner, Archival Theory and Practice in the United States: A Historical Analysis (University of Washington Press, 1983)
1983: James M. O'Toole, Guide to the Archives of the Archdiocese of Boston (Scholarly Title, 1981); Lucy F. West, The Papers of M. Carey Thomas in the Bryn Mawr College Archives: Reel Guide and Index to the Microfilm Collection (Research Publications, 1981)
1982: Edward E. Hill, Guide to Records in the National Archives Relating to American Indians (National Archives and Records Service, 1981)
1981: H.G. Jones, Local Government Records (American Association for State and Local History, 1980)
1980: Harold C. Syrett, The Papers of Alexander Hamilton (Columbia University Press, 1979)
1979: Ronald R. McCoy, The National Archives: America's Ministry of Documents (University of North Carolina Press, 1978)
1978: Richard C. Davis, North American Forest History: Guide to Archives and Manuscripts in the United States and Canada (ABC-Clio Ltd, 1976)
1977: Not awarded
1976: Kenneth W. Duckett, Modern Manuscripts: A Practical Manual for their Management, Care and Use (American Association for State and Local History, 1975)
1975: Not awarded
1974: Peter Walne, A Guide to Manuscript Sources for the History of Latin America and the Caribbean in the British Isles (University of London, 1973); David Iredale, Enjoying Archives (David and Charles, 1973)
1973: Ernst Posner, Archives in the Ancient World (Harvard University Press, 1972); Patricia Kennedy Grimsted, Archives and Manuscript Repositories in the USSR; Moscow and Leningrad (Princeton University Press, 1972)
1972: Martin Schmitt, Catalogue of Manuscripts in the University of Oregon Library (University of Oregon, 1971)
1971: Walter Rundell, Jr., In Pursuit of American History: Research and Training in the United States (University of Oklahoma Press, 1970)
1970: Edgar B. Nixon, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Foreign Policy (Harvard University Press, 1969)
1969: Henry P. Beers, Guide to the Archives of the Government of the Confederate States of America (Washington, 1968)
1968: Andrew Oliver, Portraits of John and Abigail Adams (Harvard University Press, 1967)
1967: H.G. Jones, For History's Sake: The Preservation and Publication of North Carolina History, 1663–1903 (Chapel Hill, 1966)
1966: Edward E. Hill, Preliminary Inventory of the Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (National Archives, 1965)
1965: Ernst Posner, American State Archives (University of Chicago Press, 1964)
1964: Morris L. Radoff and Phebe R. Jacobsen, The County Courthouses and Records of Maryland, published in two parts (Annapolis, 1960, 1963).
1963: Kenneth W. Munden and Henry P. Beers, Guide to Federal Archives Relating to the Civil War (National Archives, 1962)
1962: Philip M. Hamer, A Guide to Archives and Manuscripts in the United States (New Haven, 1961)
1961: Oliver W. Holmes, "Public Records—Who Knows What They Are?," SAA Presidential Address (1961)
1960: Julian P. Boyd, "These Precious Monuments of… Our History” Lecture (Princeton University)
1959: Theodore R. Schellenberg and Manual C. Stampa, Archivos Modernos: Principles y Tecnicas (La Habana : Imprenta del Archivo Nacional, 1958)
Graduate student chapters of the Society of American Archivists:
Student chapters are encouraged to broaden their understanding of archival issues, archival education, and the archives profession by:
A student chapter whose membership falls below five individual members of SAA (whether at the student membership level or otherwise) or that fails to submit an annual report will be contacted by the staff liaison. The executive director will then make a recommendation to the Council regarding the continuation of the student chapter.
The use of SAA’s name, logo, and auspices for publications, meetings, mailings, websites, social networks, electronic communications, and other activities is available only through specific provision of the Council and will conform to Uniform Guidelines for Use of the SAA Logo. Student chapters, although they are within the SAA structure, are not empowered to take action in the name of SAA, or request money in the name of SAA or the student chapter itself, without specific prior authorization of the Council. This firm rule is required to protect SAA and its members from potential legal complications.
Approved by Council: June 1993
Revised: February 2004, October 2010, July 2013
Adopted by the Council: January 2012
Revised: July 2013
The A*CENSUS II Working Group was created by the SAA Council in December 2020 to work with SAA’s survey research consultants (Ithaka S+R) to design, field, and report out on the second iteration of Archival Census and Education Needs Survey in the United States (A*CENSUS). The survey project, conducted from September 2020 to February 2023, is being funded by a National Leadership Project Grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
The Working Group is responsible for 1) reviewing and discussing previous survey instruments and findings to determine what information should be captured to enable longitudinal analyses, 2) identifying new areas of interest for incorporation into the survey, 3) developing thematic areas of interest for a new survey of archival institutions, and 4) assisting in identification of groups and institutions that should be invited to participate in the survey.
I. Purpose
The Joint Working Group coordinates efforts and initiatives of the Council of State Archivists (CoSA), the National Association of Government Archives and Records Administrators (NAGARA), the Regional Archival Associations Consortium (RAAC), and the Society of American Archivists (SAA) in areas of common concern and action, including: 1) coordinating action to address public policy and legislative concerns for the archives and records management profession, 2) cooperating on efforts to raise awareness of the value of archives and records management, and 3) coordinating strategies for the preservation of and access to archival records throughout the United States, its territories, and the District of Columbia.
II. Size, Composition, Selection, and Length of Terms
The Joint Working Group consists of eight voting members. Each organization selects two members to serve on the Joint Working Group for a renewable two-year staggered term after each organization’s annual meeting.
The Joint Working Group shall select its chair or shared method of leadership annually by a majority vote. The chair selection will be reviewed and confirmed by the President/Chair of each organization.
A second group of ex-officio non-voting members, not to exceed four people, may be added to the Joint Working Group by majority vote of the Joint Working Group for a one-year renewable term. These members shall either:
III. Reporting
Joint Working Group members are responsible for reporting to their leadership group according to the standards of each organization.
Guidelines and procedures for reviewing and providing a streamlined approval process among the four organizations shall be developed by the Working Group and shall be approved by the boards of the four organizations prior to implementation.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Joint Working Group creates an annual work plan that identifies tactics, communication with respective boards, and development of broad networks of allied organizations. The plan is approved annually by the boards of the four organizations.
The Joint Working Group focuses on issues, trends, and positions in the following areas:
V. Meetings
The Joint Working Group determines an appropriate meeting schedule to complete its annual plan. Funding for conference calls is supported equally by the four organizations. Other funding for in-person meetings or products and initiatives of the Joint Working Group is determined collaboratively by the leaders of the four organizations.
VI. Staffing
The organizations with permanent staff shall provide, on a rotating annual basis, support to conduct meetings, coordinate note taking, and assist in program implementation.
Approved by the SAA Council, October 2014. Revisions approved by the sponsoring organizations and the Joint Working Group, October 13, 2020.
Purpose
The Crisis, Disaster, and Tragedy Response Working Group was created in 2020.
The purpose of the Working Group is to maintain and update SAA’s Documenting in Times of Crisis: A Resource Kit; develop and provide immediate and ongoing resources and response assistance to archivists, allied cultural heritage professionals, and their communities in times of tragedies, disasters, or other crises; and build partnerships with organizations focused on relief efforts and cultural stewardship and preservation.
Working Group Size, Selection, and Length of Term
The Working Group consists of a maximum of 12 members, including two co-chairs. At least one member of the Working Group shall be an international representative (that is, an individual who lives and works outside of the United States). Working Group members serve staggered three-year terms with the possibility of reappointment. Individuals are eligible to serve a single three-year term as co-chair, with the final year of that term as past-co-chair. Co-chairs should ideally serve as a regular member of the Working Group prior to their appointment as co-chair. Although an individual may serve as Co-chair during future reappointments, consecutive reappointments to this role will not be made. The Vice President, on behalf of the Council and with the recommendation of the Working Group, makes new appointments and appoints the co-chairs.
Duties and Responsibilities
The Working Group has the following duties and responsibilities:
Reporting
The Working Group works closely with its Council liaison, staff liaison, and the executive director to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of archivists, allied cultural heritage professionals, and their communities. In certain cases, when time is of the essence, the Working Group communicates directly with the SAA Executive Committee. The Working Group reports to the Council annually and u pon request.
Approved by the SAA Council, August 2020, November 2023.
Disbanded with thanks by the SAA Council, November 2018.
The Cultural Heritage Working Group will take the lead in fostering discussion, clarifying issues, and investigating a range of alternative approaches to managing, preserving, and providing access to cultural property, given the T and responsibilities of cultural groups and stakeholders and archivists' interest in providing equal and open access to all. This group will
The group will submit a work plan with specific activities, outcomes, and timelines for the Council's review and approval at its May 2010 meeting.
The establishment of the Cultural Heritage Working Group represents the beginning of SAA's attempts to open a professional, national, and international discussion regarding the presence of cultural material in repositories. Some challenges in establishing the best practices for the culturally responsive care and use of Native American archival materials are illustrated in a specific discussion of Protocols for Native American Archival Materials. This Working Group broadens the discussion to include other repositories, professions, and cultures that face similar challenges when establishing best practices.
Adopted by the SAA Council: August 10, 2009
Revised: January 2013
Disbanded: November 2018.
The Dictionary Working Group maintains and updates Dictionary of Archives Terminology, which has its basis in A Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology (SAA, 2005).
I. Purpose:
The Working Group's purpose is to establish and maintain mechanisms and procedures for allowing periodic updates and contributions of new content to the Dictionary and to ensure that this important resource adheres to the highest quality professional standards.
II. Working Group Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Working Group consists of nine members, including one representative from the Publications Board. Working Group members serve staggered four-year terms with the possibility of reappointment. The Vice President, on behalf of the Council and with the recommendation of the Working Group, makes new appointments and appoints the chair.
III. Duties and Responsibilities:
The Working Group has the following duties and responsibilities:
IV. Reporting:
The Working Group reports to the Council annually and upon request.
Adopted by the SAA Council: August 22, 2011
Revised: August 2012, January 2014
The Working Group on Intellectual Property was created as a working group of the Council in May 2001. Intellectual property issues are complex and require a special expertise. They often require a very quick response, such as when SAA is asked to join litigation or respond to draft legislation. The Working Group's purpose is to make sure that timely expertise is readily available to the Council. The Working Group responds to requests for assistance from the Council, tracks intellectual property issues of concern to archivists, and drafts for Council approval responses or position papers as needed.
Working Group Size, Selection and Length of Term:
There is no fixed size to the Working Group. In response to requests from the Working Group, the Council adjusts membership according to the availability of expertise and the anticipated workload of the group. The Vice President, on behalf of the Council and with the recommendation of the Working Group, makes new appointments. There is no prohibition against a member of the Council serving on the Working Group.
In recognition that the type of expertise needed on the Working Group is in short supply in the Society, there is no set length of term for participation; members serve at the pleasure of the Council.
Duties and Responsibilities:
The Working Group has the following duties and responsibilities:
Reporting:
The Working Group works closely with its Council Liaison and the Executive Director in order to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of the Council. In certain cases, when time is of the essence, the Working Group communicates directly with the Executive Committee.
Adopted by the SAA Executive Committee: September 29, 2006
The Podcast Working Group produces and publishes one season annually of Archives in Context, an open-access podcast exploring significant conversations around archival practice in SAA, the profession, and beyond.
I. Purpose:
The Working Group's purpose is to host via podcast dynamic and professional conversations with archivists contributing to the archival literature, to SAA and the profession, and public access and awareness of archives.
II. Working Group Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Working Group consists of ten members. Working Group members serve staggered two-year terms with the possibility of reappointment. The Vice President, or project coordinator, on behalf of the Council and with the recommendation of the Working Group, makes new appointments and appoints the chair.
III. Duties and Responsibilities:
The Working Group has the following duties and responsibilities:
IV. Reporting:
The Working Group reports to the Council annually and upon request.
I. Purpose
The Section Health Assessment Working Group (SHAWG) will pursue envisioning a new, remote-first model for Sections which support the following foundational principles:
Sections are valuable communities of practice that foster information-exchange, creativity of expression, and support for members.
The model for sections needs to be sustainable in terms of funds, staff and volunteer time, and administrative maintenance.
Council liaisons have a responsibility to support their sections through proactive communication and orientation to SAA’s governance requirements, and SAA section leaders have a responsibility to adhere to governance requirements and communicate with their liaison. This allows us to hold section leaders and the associated Council liaison collectively accountable for compliance with governance responsibilities.
II. Working Group Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The SHAWG will include up to five volunteer members and two Council members, at least one of whom will be in their second or third year on Council.
The volunteer members will be selected by the current Working Group members after a Call for Expressions of Interest and will be appointed for the 2-year interim span. Expressions of interest and selection of members should include the consideration that at least two volunteer members should have recently served on a section steering committee.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
As part of their envisionment work, the SHAWG will review the full spring 2023 section health survey responses closely, with particular attention to the ideas generated for future models of sections. They may conduct focus groups to gain broader feedback and buy-in. As a new section/communities of practice model is developed, the Working Group will lead a Town Hall or other membership communication efforts to communicate the model and form a transition plan from the current model. Toward the end of the Working Group’s two year initial term, Working Group members should conduct an assessment of their work to determine whether a proposal should go to Council to extend or alter the work.
SAA Council working group members are responsible for facilitating the Guidelines for SAA Sections on Merging, Transitioning to a Discussion Group, and Sunsetting.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The SHAWG reports to the Council and will submit regular updates to that group, in addition to ensuring that SAA members are aware of their ongoing work.
The Council Liaison(s) will regularly report to Council on the work of the group as well as ensure that regular meetings occur and deliverables are produced.
The SHAWG is also responsible for ensuring that minutes of the group’s meetings are prepared and posted on the group’s microsite to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping requirements.
V. Meetings
The working group shall meet virtually as needed to conduct its work. The working group may conduct its business by email, telephone, or virtual meeting during the course of the year.
Adopted by Council: August 2024
The following are criteria considered for the selection of annual meeting sessions to be taped. These criteria are applied by the Executive Director in consultation with the Program Committee:
Approved by the Council: June 14, 1996
Revised: February 2008; May 2016
*The policy for childcare services for registrants at the SAA Annual Meeting is currently under review.
Upon request, SAA will put Annual Meeting registrants in contact with child care sevice providers. SAA will subsidize the cost for child care and will plan an appropriate amount in each year's Annual Meeting budget.
[For more information or to discuss support for child care, contact SAA Chief Executive Officer Jacqualine Price Osafo at jpriceosafo[at]archivists.org or 866-722-7858, ext. 212.]
The meeting registration material should clearly indicate that a small portion of each registration fee is used to cover the costs of childcare services, pursuant to actions of the 1984 business meeting and January 1985 and 1993 Council meetings.
Adopted by the Council: January 1993
Revised: February 2008; May 2024
The Society of American Archivists is a professional organization established to serve the educational and informational needs of its members. SAA promotes cooperation, research, standards, public awareness, and relations with allied professions and thereby advances the identification, preservation, and use of records of enduring value. Because discrimination and unequal treatment are inimical to the Society's goals, SAA hereby declares that discrimination on the grounds of age, color, political and religious beliefs, ability, family relationship, gender identity/expression, individual life style, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran status is prohibited within the Society. SAA will vigorously pursue a policy of non-discrimination and equal opportunity through its programs, activities, services, operations, employment, and business contracts.
Adopted by the SAA Council in January 1992; updated February 2009; reviewed and reaffirmed in February 2010 and January 2011, 2012, and 2013; updated in May 2016, July 2019, May 2020. The Council agreed to review every three years this document, SAA's Statement on Diversity (January 2014), and SAA's Code of Conduct (July 2014). Last Reviewed: May 2020.
SAA members and groups often develop worthy initiatives which deserve, but due to limited financial resources cannot receive, Society funding. As a result, members may periodically wish to approach outside funding sources. On these occasions the Society will work closely and in a collaborative manner with membership to develop strong, well-constructed proposals for submission to granting agencies, foundations or corporate sponsors.
It is important to the success of the Society and the proposal that members, in turn, work closely with SAA leadership to secure appropriate financial and legal review of proposals. On some occasions a formal proposal may not be necessary, but members should always involve the Executive Director before initial approach to funders. To assist members, the SAA has established the following guidelines for formal grant submissions.
It is the Executive Director's responsibility to keep Council and officers fully informed about grant proposals in development, and will provide Council with a summary of these activities at the Spring and Fall meeting.
Adopted by SAA Council: June 1991
Revised: June 1994
Amendments to an organization’s constitution and bylaws have a significant potential to alter the organization’s strategic course. Informed decision making by an assembly is important in all matters, but particularly when considering revisions to charter documents. Therefore, Section 11 of SAA’s Bylaws charges the Executive Committee to “review and approve a briefing paper, prepared by the proposer(s) and/or by the Executive Director in accordance with Council guidelines, which shall be presented with the motion(s) at the business meeting or at a special meeting called by the Council.” The purpose of such briefing papers is to assist voting members in understanding the background, rationale, and ramifications of proposed amendments. Briefing papers should present a balanced view of the issue(s) under consideration.
GUIDELINES
Briefing papers on proposed constitutional and bylaws amendments will be attached as exhibits to a motion and will contain supplementary information that facilitates informed deliberation and decision-making.
Authors: The proposer(s) are encouraged to submit a draft briefing paper upon filing a motion with the Executive Director. The executive office will provide information and other assistance as needed, provided that the requisite number of eligible voting members, as specified in the Constitution, have signed on to the motion. If a briefing paper is not submitted or if the briefing paper is incomplete, the Executive Committee will charge the Executive Director to prepare one, in whole or in part. In doing so, the Executive Director will make reasonable efforts to solicit and incorporate input from the proposer(s), who will be entitled to review and submit comments to inform the Executive Committee’s review.
Content: The briefing paper should contain the following sections:
1. Motion: The main motion is the means by which a substantive proposal may be presented to the members for consideration and action. It should be concise, clear, and stated in the affirmative. In the case of constitutional and bylaws amendments, the motion typically is phrased, “THAT the SAA Constitution/Bylaws be amended as follows,” followed by the verbatim language of the revisions, marked with strikethroughs for deletions and underlining for additions.
2. Support Statement: A summary of the findings presented in the Discussion/Analysis section. The support statement briefly articulates the rationale for the motion. Generally the Support Statement “travels with” the adopted motion in minutes and elsewhere and serves to explain the rationale for the action taken.
3. Proposed By: The names of the proposer and seconder. In the case of an amendment proposed by a group of members, primary and secondary contacts should be identified to enable communication among the proposers, the Executive Committee, and the Executive Director. A complete list of petitioners may be attached as an appendix.
4. Background: A brief description of prior events and/or discussions that helps explain why the motion is being presented. What problem will it solve? What issue will it resolve?
5. Discussion/Analysis: A detailed discussion/analysis that presents a fair and balanced review of the “pros” and “cons” of adoption of the motion. If applicable, some or all of the following questions should be addressed:
a. Is the proposal consistent with SAA’s strategic objectives, as articulated in Article II of the Constitution?
b. Is the proposal consistent with SAA’s legal and financial interests?
c. Does the proposal benefit SAA’s members as a whole?
d. Does the proposal correct an error or omission or add clarification to existing policies?
Criteria for Review: The Executive Committee will assess the briefing paper on its clarity and capacity to inform voter deliberation and will provide feedback to the proposer and/or Executive Director.
Approved by the SAA Council: January 2012.
Revised: May 2016
The SAA Council requires a diversity statement as part of the application process for elected positions and certain appointed positions (Executive Director, American Archivist Editor, and Publications Editor) as this helps SAA, its leaders, and its members to elect or appoint candidates who are best positioned to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in SAA, the profession, and beyond. It also encourages candidates and applicants to articulate the diversity they bring to their respective positions. Applicants should use the guidelines below to craft their diversity statement.
Approved by the SAA Council, January 2021.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
SAA Section Merge and Sunset Guidelines.pdf | 241.42 KB |
SAA component groups (i.e., boards, committees, subcommittees, task forces, working groups, sections, roundtables, and student chapters) are required to display the approved SAA logo on all materials pertaining to official SAA business, including newsletters, websites, social networks, posters, and other promotional materials. This should be accompanied by an appropriate disclaimer (below) regarding the responsibilities of SAA and other sponsoring institutions or organizations for the opinions and views expressed in the documents and/or events in question.
Disclaimer: Use of the SAA logo by an SAA component group does not necessarily imply SAA endorsement of the groups' statements, positions, or opinions.
Vendors, consultants, and for-profit commercial entities, including institutional members, may not use the SAA logo without obtaining prior written permission from SAA's Executive Director.
The Executive Office is responsible for the design and provision of the SAA logo.
Revised: February 2010; May 2016
Background
In 2001, the Society of American Archivists’ independent auditors pointed out the need for a formal investment policy. Both legally and ethically, the SAA Council must provide prudent oversight of the Society’s investments. This written investment policy is intended to address those concerns, and its existence will help protect SAA from liability should the Society’s investments be mismanaged. The guidelines provided in the initial investment policy included the following:
Preamble
The SAA Council is responsible for the fiduciary management of the Society. The following investment objectives and directions are to be judged and understood in light of that overall sense of stewardship.
Delegation
The SAA Council has delegated supervisory authority over its financial affairs to the Society's Finance Committee. Among its several tasks, the Finance Committee is responsible for reporting regularly to the Council on the status of SAA's investments. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Finance Committee and its agents will act in accordance with this Investment Policy and all applicable laws and regulations. The SAA Council reserves to itself the exclusive right to revise the Policy.
The SAA Council and its Finance Committee are authorized to retain one or more Financial Consultant(s) to assume the investment management of funds and assets owned or administered by SAA. In discharging this authority, the Finance Committee can act in the place of Council and may receive reports from, pay compensation to, and enter into agreements with such Financial Consultant(s). The Council may also grant exceptions to the Investment Policy when appropriate. The Finance Committee will maintain regular contact with teh Financial Consultant(s) and any investment brokers primarily through the Director of Finance and Administration, the Executive Director, or the Treasurer, all of whom are members of the Committee.
The SAA Council has established the Finance Committee to, among other responsibilities, provide oversight of SAA’s investment program, including reviewing specific quantified income needs that are adequate to cover projected fund expenses, investment administrative fees, management performance, a three-year review schedule for the SAA Investment Policy and program, and all other areas that are related and appropriate to SAA investments. The Finance Committee will receive copies of all periodic financial reports. (See Finance Committee.)
Objectives
The Society’s primary investment objective is to earn a positive total return on its investments that meets or exceeds the S&P 500. The computed total return considers dividends, interest, and realized and unrealized capital gains and it factors in capital losses and investment expenses. The Investment Policy and portfolio is reviewed by the Finance Committee and Financial Consultant(s) every three years to ensure its compliance with SAA's risk tolerance, liquidity needs, and investment objectives. This review cycle will begin in FY 2010.
Asset Mix
To accomplish the Society's investment objectives, the Financial Consultant(s) are authorized to utilize portfolios of equity securities (common stocks and convertible securities), fixed-income securities, and short-term (cash) investments. As a guide to accomplishing these objectives, the Financial Consultants shall remain within the following ranges:
Operating Expenses: SAA's operating funds will be managed for liquidity and preservation of principle. No more than 50% of SAA's operating funds are to be invested in fixed-income securities (such as U.S. and corporate funds or prime rate funds), with the remaining funds kept in cash and equivalents (such as money market funds and CDs).
Long-Term Investments: SAA's endowment and reserve funds (including the Awards Funds, Endowment Funds, Publications Funds and Deferred Income Fund) are to be managed with a longer time horizon in mind (between three to five years). Thus, 40% to 60% of these funds should be invested in equity securities (such as stocks or stock mutual funds), 25% to 50% should be invested in fixed-income securities or bond mutual funds, and 5% to 20% should be invested in cash and equivalents.
The Finance Committee can modify these ranges from time to time with the Council's approval. The actual investment targets shall be set within those limits by the Financial Consultant(s) in conjunction with SAA's designated financial officer.
Asset Standards
Common stocks: The Financial Consultant(s) responsible for managing the funds for SAA's endowed and reserve funds may invest in any unrestricted, publicly traded common stock that is listed on a major exchange or a national, over-the-counter market that is appropriate for the portfolio objectives, asset class, and/or investment style defined in this policy. This investment can be in the form of direct investment in the stock market, or indirect investment via mutual funds. Mutual funds should be considered where they offer additional portfolio diversification; lower purchase, maintenance, and sale costs; and good potential gain.
Convertible preferred stock and convertible bonds: The Financial Consultant(s) may use convertible preferred stocks and bonds as equity investments. The quality rating of convertible preferred stock and convertible bonds generally should be BBB or better (as rated by Standard & Poor's) or Baa or better (as rated by Moody's). The common stock into which both may be converted must satisfy the standard specified for common stocks.
Fixed-income securities: The quality rating of bonds and notes must be investment grade (BBB or better, as rated by Standard & Poor's or Moody's). Bonds and notes within a bond mutual fund must, on average, be investment grade (BBB or better, as rated by Standard & Poor's or Moody's). The portfolio may consist of only traditional principal and interest obligations (no derivatives) with maturities of seven years or less, or bond funds with average maturities of seven years or less.
Prime rate funds: Any investments in prime rate funds should include a 90-day liquidity.
Cash/cash equivalents: The quality rating of commercial paper must be A-1 (as rated by Standard & Poor's), P-1 (as rated by Moody's), or better. The assets of any money market mutual funds must comply with this standard and/or the quality provisions for fixed-income securities.
Asset Diversification
As a general policy, the Financial Consultant(s) will maintain a reasonable diversification at all times. The Financial Consultant(s) responsible for long-term investments may not allow the investments in the equity securities of any one company to exceed 5% of the portfolio nor the total securities position (debt and equity) in any one company to exceed 10% of the portfolio. The Financial Consultant(s) shall also maintain reasonable sector allocations and diversification. In that regard, no more than 25% of the entire portfolio may be invested in the securities of any one sector.
Custody and Securities Brokerage
The Finance Committee will establish such custodial and brokerage relationships as are necessary for the efficient management of the Society's funds. Whenever the Finance Committee has not designated a brokerage relationship, then the Financial Consultants shall execute transactions wherever they can obtain best price and execution.
Transactions
All purchases of securities will be for cash and there will be no margin transactions, short selling, or commodity transactions.
Reporting Requirements
Monthly: The Financial Consultant(s) will provide the Finance Committee with a monthly written statement containing all pertinent transaction details for SAA's investment portfolio, including:
Periodically: The Financial Consultants shall provide the Finance Committee with detailed information about (1) asset allocation, (2) investment performance, (3) future investment strategies, and (4) any other matters of interest to the finance Committee.
Annually: The Financial Consultant(s) shall provide to the SAA Council an annual summary of all transactions in each fiscal year, together with a report of investment performance for the year and a "snapshot" listing of current investments.
Cash Flow Requirements
SAA will be responsible for advising the Financial Consultant(s) in a timely manner of the Society's cash distribution requirements from any managed account. The Financial Consultant(s) are responsible for providing adequate liquidity to meet SAA's cash flow requirements in accordance with Council's policy.
Adopted by the SAA Council: August 2002; revised August 10, 2009
Due to stringent liquor liability laws, no SAA group may provide alcoholic beverages at a Society or group function unless it is served by a contracted facility or caterer that maintains liquor liability insurance. Failure to abide by this policy places SAA at great legal risk.
Approved by Council: June 14, 1996.
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Operating Reserve Policy is to ensure that SAA builds and maintains an adequate level of unrestricted net assets to support the organization’s day-to-day operations in the event of unforeseen shortfalls. The reserve may also be used for one-time, nonrecurring expenses that will build long-term capacity, such as research and development, staff development, or investment in infrastructure. Operating reserves are not intended to replace a permanent loss of funds or eliminate an ongoing budget gap. SAA intends for the operating reserves to be used and replenished within a reasonable period of time. This Operating Reserve Policy will be implemented in conjunction with the other financial policies of the organization (see SAA Governance Manual, Appendix A. Current SAA Policies and Procedures), and is intended to support the goals and strategies outlined in those related policies and in strategic and operational plans.
II. DEFINITIONS AND GOALS
SAA’s reserves will be held in two discreet funds: 1) the Operating Reserve Fund and 2) the Projects Fund. Both will be funded by retained earnings from SAA operations.
The Operating Reserve Fund is established to provide sufficient funds to maintain ongoing operations and programs for a period of six months. The target minimum to be held in this reserve fund is equal to a rolling six-month average of recurring operating costs for the immediate prior period in which the SAA annual meeting occurred.
The Projects Fund may be used to fund specific strategic or organizational goals, beyond what might be considered “ongoing operations.” (This fund serves a purpose much like the Technology Fund, which was established in 2001 and superseded by this Projects Fund.) This fund will not be subject to a target minimum.
III. ACCOUNTING FOR RESERVES
The Operating Reserve Fund and the Projects Fund will be recorded in the accounting and financial statements as Council-designated funds. Both will be funded by and available in cash or cash equivalents and/or conservative long-term bond investments. Operating and Projects reserves will be commingled with the general cash and investment accounts of the organization.
IV. FUNDING OF RESERVES
The Operating Reserve Fund and the Projects Fund will be funded with surplus unrestricted operating funds. The SAA Council may, from time to time, direct that a specific source of revenue be set aside for either fund. Examples may include one-time gifts or bequests, special grants, or special appeals.
V. AUTHORITY TO USE THE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
The Executive Director and Director of Finance/Administration will identify the need for access to the Operating Reserve Fund, confirm that the use is consistent with the purpose of the reserves as described in this Operating Reserve Policy, notify the Finance Committee, and make a recommendation for approval to the Executive Committee. Determination of need requires analysis of 1) the sufficiency of the current level of reserve funds, 2) the availability of any other sources of funds before using reserves, and 3) the time period during which the funds will be required and replenished. Should the Executive Committee determine that replenishment would likely take more than twelve months from the date of notification, it will seek approval from the full Council.
Upon funding approval, authority to implement use of the Operating Reserve Fund is delegated to the Executive Director and the Director of Finance/Administration in consultation with the Treasurer and the Finance Committee. Disbursement of Operating Reserve Fund reserves will be reported to the SAA Council at its next scheduled meeting, with a description of the rationale for the use of funds and plans for replenishing the Operating Reserve Fund to the target minimum amount (or other such level as determined by the SAA Council).
The Operating Reserve Fund will be reviewed annually by the Finance Committee and target levels adjusted as internal and external changes require.
VI. AUTHORITY TO USE THE PROJECTS FUND
The SAA Council will identify the need for access to the Projects Fund and confirm that the use is consistent with the purpose of the reserves as described in this Operating Reserve Policy. Authorization for the use of funds from the Projects Fund will require a Council resolution identifying the purpose and duration of the financial support and its relation to the SAA Strategic Plan.
Authority to implement use of the Projects Fund is delegated to the Executive Director and the Director of Finance/Administration in consultation with the Treasurer and the Finance Committee, as appropriate. Use of the Projects Fund will be reported to the Finance Committee and the Council according to the routine financial reporting schedule.
VII. REPORTING AND MONITORING
The Executive Director and Director of Finance/Administration are responsible for ensuring that the Operating Reserve Fund and the Projects Fund are maintained and used only as described in this Policy. The Executive Director and Director of Finance/Administration will maintain records of the use of funds and the plan for replenishment, and will provide regular reports to the Finance Committee and the Council.
Each year, the Executive Director and Director of Finance/Administration will discuss with the Finance Committee and the Council what additional risk factors might be considered for the organization, the impact of budgeting on operating reserve levels, and any requirements with funders.
VIII. REVIEW OF POLICY
This Policy will be reviewed by the Finance Committee every year, or sooner if warranted by internal or external events or changes. Changes to the Policy will be recommended by the Finance Committee to the SAA Council. This policy, upon every revision hereof, must be distributed by the Director of Finance/Administration to the following: the SAA Council, the SAA Foundation Board of Directors, SAA staff directors, and SAA’s audit partner.
Approved by the SAA Council, October 2019.
Policies That Apply to SAA’s Constituent Bodies: Sections, Roundtables, Committees, Boards, Task Forces, Representatives
A. Regular Meetings
Shared or dedicated space (see Section and Roundtable guidelines for details of how space is allocated) for the regular annual meetings of these groups is provided by SAA in or near the conference facility. This space and time is assigned by the SAA staff according to the general schedule of the conference and information received in response to a call for meeting space requests.
The meetings are listed in the Annual Meeting program.
Room set-ups are arranged by the SAA staff.
Hotel contracts invariably require that all food and beverages consumed in meeting room space must be provided by the hotel. To do otherwise places the Society in violation of its contract. SAA does not pay for food or beverage breaks for these group meetings.
Should an SAA body want food service or a coffee break in its meeting, the group should request funding in advance according to the procedure and deadline specified in Sections IX and X of the Governance Manual.
B. Office Hours in the Exhibit Hall
SAA offers booth space in the Exhibit Hall for “Office Hours” for constituent groups that wish to meet with meeting attendees.
The Society arranges for the set up and pays for any decorator fees and booth fees assessed by the conference facility.
Space and time slots are filled as available on a first-come, first-served basis, as requests are received in the SAA office.
C. Any Other Function or Activity
The Society is legally and financially responsible for the activities of its constituent bodies. Any SAA group that wishes to hold a function other than its regular meeting and Office Hours is governed by the following:
Policies That Apply to Regional, State, and Metropolitan Archival Associations
A. Office Hours
The Society offers a limited amount of booth space in the Exhibit Hall for “Office Hours” to regional, state, and metropolitan archival associations that wish to meet with meeting attendees.
The Society arranges for the set up and pays any decorator fees and booth fees assessed by the conference facility.
Space and time slots are filled as available on a first-come, first-served basis, as requests are received in the SAA office.
B. Other Events
A number of associations traditionally hold social events in conjunction with SAA’s Annual Meeting. SAA is not able to offer space to hold such events.
Upon request, the Society will note such events as “Other Events” in the final print and online program that is distributed to meeting registrants.
Policies That Apply to Associations of Archivists Other Than Regional, State, or Metropolitan Associations
A. Complimentary Space
Some SAA Annual Meeting attendees are members of other associations of archivists that wish to use this occasion to hold their own gatherings. Because of the demands on limited space, SAA is unable to offer complimentary space for meetings or social functions to anyone other than its own constituent bodies and grant-funding agencies or organizations.
B. Events as Part of the SAA Annual Meeting
Groups that wish to hold a reception or meeting at the conference facility as part of the SAA Annual Meeting may be accommodated as follows:
C. Other Events
Other groups are free to make their own arrangements for activities or functions at their own expense. Upon request, the Society will note such activities as “Other Events” in the final print and online program that is distributed to meeting registrants.
Policies That Apply to Agencies or Organizations That Offer Grant Funding to Archivists or Archival Repositories
A. Office Hours
The Society may offer a limited amount of complimentary booth space in the Exhibit Hall for “Office Hours” to grant-funding agencies.
Space and time slots are filled on a first-come, first-served basis as requests are received in the SAA office.
Such agencies or organizations may choose to secure a separate booth for the entire exhibit time by paying the non-profit rate for exhibitors.
B. Space for Other Functions
Such agencies or organizations may request complimentary space in meeting rooms. Such requests will be honored on a first-come, first-served basis after all of SAA’s own requirements for meeting space have been fulfilled, provided that the requests are made no less that three months before the conference.
Hotel and convention center contracts invariably require that all food and beverages consumed in meeting room space must be provided by the hotel or conference center. To do otherwise places the Society in violation of its contract. Should a grant-funding agency wish to provide food or beverage service, the SAA office will provide menus and ordering information. The organization will be billed directly by the hotel or convention center.
Annual Meeting Firms or Organizations That Provide Goods and Services for Fees or Sale
Such groups are welcome to meet with conference attendees by becoming exhibitors and paying the appropriate rates.
Any other functions that such groups wish to hold will be arranged entirely by them at their own expense. SAA does not publish listings for such events, although it will accept paid advertisements for inclusion in the Program.
Adopted by the SAA Council: January 1992
Revised: March 2007; May 2016
Non-participation by a member of a Council-appointed group (i.e., Boards, Committees, Task Forces, and Working Groups) is defined as missing two consecutive group and/or scheduled conference calls; not taking an active part in the work of the group; or not completing tasks within assigned deadlines.
As a first step, the Chair of a Council-appointed group should reach out to the non-participating individual to try to reach a constructive and collegial solution that will result in the member’s full participation.
If, after this first step, the chair of a Council-appointed group finds that a member is unwilling or unable to fulfill his or her obligations to the group, as described above, the chair may ask in writing for that member's voluntary resignation from the group.
The chair also will provide the SAA President and Executive Director with written notification of that action through the group’s Council liaison.
If there is no response to the call for resignation within one month of the date of the written communication, the chair of the group will notify the SAA President through the group’s Council liaison. The President will contact the member by telephone to notify the individual that she or he is about to be replaced on the group, but will allow the individual the opportunity to respond and explain the situation from her or his perspective. The President will then decide whether to remove the person from the group. If the individual is to be removed, the President will inform her or him of this action by letter, with a copy to the group chair. If deemed necessary, the Vice President/President-Elect will name a replacement to complete the group member's term.
In the case that the chair is unable or unwilling to fulfill his or her obligations, the SAA President will contact the chair to discuss replacement.
Adopted by the SAA Council: July 25, 2013
Revised: May 2016
Section VII of the Constitution of the Society of American Archivists [1] states:
"The records of the Society, of the Council, and other units of the Society shall be preserved by the officers, Councilors, the Executive Director, and unit chairs, and shall be promptly turned over by them to their successors. Noncurrent records shall be appraised by direction of the Council upon recommendation of the Society's archivist, those records of continuing value shall be placed for preservation in the Society's official archives, and the Council shall determine a policy of access to these records."
In 2001, the Society of American Archivists (SAA) designated the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee (UWM) as its official archival home, and named the head of its Archives Department as SAA Archivist. SAA’s archives dating from the Society’s founding in 1936 are described in an online finding aid [2] and open to researchers in the UWM Archives’ reading room. Recognizing that a significant portion of SAA’s current records are now shared via the Society’s website, in 2014 the UWM Archives, with Council’s approval, initiated a web crawling program, still in its early experimental phase, to capture, preserve and provide access to SAA current born-digital permanent records.
SAA’s RRP provides a framework for ensuring the preservation and accessibility of core documentation of the work of the Society’s members, leaders, and staff. It communicates to SAA leaders and members how their records of enduring value will be captured and maintained either by the UWM or by the SAA Office.
Scope: The RRP contains records schedules that identify official SAA records of permanent value and provides direction for their retention and disposition either by the SAA Office or by the SAA Archives. It also identifies non-permanent records that can be kept as long as administratively useful or legally necessary and then destroyed. It applies to records in the existing SAA Archives as well as to current records, and to SAA staff, elected and appointed leaders, component groups, and members.
Retention Period: The RRP in most cases deliberately avoids suggesting specific retention periods for temporary records, as SAA records creators are in the best position to determine how long to keep materials before discarding them. For records scheduled for permanent retention, the SAA Office staff and SAA leaders should work out the best arrangements in collaboration with both the designated records liaison in the SAA Office and the SAA Archivist.
Disposition: The RRP avoids identifying the manner in which records identified for permanent retention will be transferred to the SAA archives. Most permanent records will be harvested by UWM during an annual crawl of the SAA website. In other cases, transfer may be accomplished by shipment of physical records or delivery of electronic records to a file-sharing site, the details of which will be worked out between the SAA Archives and the designated records liaison in the SAA Office.
Revisions, Additions, and Review: The Council delegates to the Executive Committee ongoing authority to review and approve retention and disposition schedules for SAA records on behalf of the Council. Changes to this RRP--discussed by the appropriate SAA leaders, the designated records liaison in the SAA Office, and the SAA Archivist--may be recommended to and approved by the Executive Committee at any time. If ten years have passed from the most recent RRP revision date, or if a determination is made that the general policy statement contained in this RRP requires revision, the Executive Committee will initiate a review of the RRP, to be undertaken, at minimum, by the SAA Archivist, the SAA Office’s designated records liaison, and representative members of the Council.
Roles and Responsibilities
SAA Archivist: Develops records schedules in consultation with the records creators including staff, officers, and component group leaders; works primarily with the SAA Office’s designated records liaison. The responsibilities and authority of the SAA Archivist are defined in the 2001 agreement between SAA and UWM and include appraisal, processing, preservation and outreach.
Designated Records Liaison: A member of the SAA staff who serves as the point person for managing the records of the SAA Office, communicating with the SAA Archivist, referring questions to the Archives, and facilitating transfer of records to the SAA Archives as indicated by the records schedule.
[1] http://www2.archivists.org/governance/handbook/section1/constitution
[2] http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/wiarchives.uw-mil-uwmmss0172
Adopted by the SAA Council: May 2014
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
SAARecords_PolicyAndSchedules_071614.pdf | 416.99 KB |
Statement of Purpose
The Society of American Archivists (SAA) Dataverse is an SAA data service that was established to support the needs and interests of SAA’s members and the broader archives community. The SAA Dataverse supports the reuse of datasets for purposes of fostering knowledge, insights, and a deeper understanding of archival organizations, the status of archivists, and the impact of archives and archival work on the broader society. Deposited datasets should be “actionable” in that they should support direct analysis and interpretation. The SAA Dataverse welcomes deposits of collections of quantitative or qualitative data and associated documentation.
Guiding Principles and Collecting Focus
The SAA Dataverse welcomes data created by the SAA community and allied organizations and individuals.
SAA will prioritize data identified by and solicited for deposit by CORDA in its role as developer and manager of the SAA Dataverse repository.
Submission Requirements and Data Formats
Datasets and associated documentation must conform to the SAA Dataverse Terms of Use and SAA Dataverse Data Deposit Form. [Link expected to be available in Spring 2021.] Submissions will be reviewed by a designated review committee of SAA’s Committee on Research, Data, and Analysis (CORDA), and ingest will depend on adherence to the Guiding Principles and Collecting Focus. Review does not include assessment of methodology used.
Data should provide information about:
Associated documentation can take the form of:
All contextual information necessary to understand and use the data (such as readme files, checklists, etc) is a mandatory component of the dataset. The submitter must remove all personally identifiable information (PII). The submitter must supply metadata to the fullest extent possible at the time of ingestion.
Preservation:
The SAA Dataverse is hosted by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which is a trusted repository for research data, datasets, and associated research whose mission is to provide long-term data archiving and data sharing. The Odum Institute’s systems, policies, and procedures have been developed in alignment with standards for trustworthy digital repositories as outlined in ISO 14721 Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) and ISO 16363 Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Data is preserved at the bit-level. Deposited items will be retained for the lifetime of the SAA Dataverse.
Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights:
All datasets and supporting documentation must be granted for distribution in the SAA Dataverse. Uploaded materials must be made freely available via a Creative Commons license. Datasets and associated documentation may be deposited in repositories outside of the SAA Dataverse if permission and copyright allow.
Deaccessioning:
Deaccessioning records from the SAA Dataverse should occur only if there is a legal or otherwise valid reason for the dataset to no longer be accessible to the public. If a record must be deaccessioned, a version of the dataset or the entire dataset may be deaccessioned. If a record was published for any amount of time, a “tombstone page” will remain for records or data that have been deaccessioned to indicate its removal. Submitters must work with CORDA to deaccession data or records.
Approved by the SAA Council, March 2021.
Requesting Funds from Within SAA
Money is allocated for Section/Roundtable activities through the regular SAA budget process. Sections/Roundtables are not authorized to spend any monies or commit any monies to be spent without specific authorization from the SAA Executive Committee through the budget process or through special approval. Funding from within SAA is requested through annual reports which should be submitted by Section/Roundtable chairs by December 31 of each year. The budget for the following fiscal year (July 1 - June 30) is approved by the Council in May. Throughout the year, special approval for funding from within SAA may be obtained by submitting a request in writing to the SAA Executive Director at least sixty (60) days prior to the next Council meeting.
Solicitation of Funds or In-Kind Contributions from Outside Sources
If a Section/Roundtable wishes to seek resources (whether in case or in-kind) from any source outside SAA, Executive Committee approval must be obtained in every instance before approaching the source or before the transaction takes place. When approaching outside sources, the Section/Roundtable should keep in mind that, according to legal counsel, "to the extent that any monies are deducted by donors on their taxes, they are presumably deductible as business deductions and not charitable deductions." This holds true unless that donation is made to a special project fund.
Sections/Roundtables, although within the SAA structure, are not empowered to take action in the name of SAA, or to request money in the name of SAA or of the Section/Roundtable itself, without specific authorization of the Executive Committee. Under no circumstance should a Section/Roundtable maintain a separate bank account. This firm rule is required to protect SAA and its members from potential legal complications.
Use of SAA Name, Logo and Auspices
The use of SAA’s name, logo, and auspices for publications, meetings, mailings, websites, social networks, electronic communications, and other activities is available only through specific provision of the Council and shall conform to Uniform Guidelines for Use of the SAA Logo. Sections/Roundtables, although they are within the SAA structure, are not empowered to take action in the name of SAA, or request money in the name of SAA or the Section/Roundtable itself, without specific prior authorization of the Council. This firm rule is required to protect SAA and its members from potential legal complications.
Approved by Council: June 14, 1996
Revised: February 2010
Overview
The explosive and continuing growth of electronic communications technology presents SAA with the opportunity to better serve its members and to enhance collaboration between and among internal and external audiences. SAA establishes these guidelines as a means to encourage the effective development, dissemination, and sharing of resources throughout the Society, to regularize the functions and operations of SAA's component groups, and to otherwise facilitate the efforts of member leaders. These guidelines apply to the online information resources sponsored and/or maintained by the SAA office and to all websites, e-mail discussion lists, wikis, blogs, document sharing sites, and social networks sponsored and/or maintained by official SAA component groups.
Definitions
SAA network: The entire collection of websites, e-mail discussion lists, wikis, blogs, document sharing sites, and social networks sponsored and/or maintained by the Society of American Archivists and its component groups.
SAA main website: The collection of documents maintained by the SAA office residing on its Web server(s) at http://www.archivists.org (a.k.a. the "Extranet") and http://saa.archivists.org (a.k.a. the "Intranet").
SAA content management system (CMS): The Web database application maintained by the SAA office and used to administer content published to http://www.archivists.org.
SAA list server: The server application maintained by the SAA office, residing at http://forums.archivists.org, and hosting officially sponsored e-mail discussion lists.
SAA component group website: A subdirectory of the main website for use by an official component group.
SAA auxiliary site: An independently hosted website, e-mail discussion list, wiki, blog, document sharing utility, or social network containing content sponsored and/or maintained by teh SAA office or by an official component group.
Guidelines
A. General Guidelines
Documents published by the SAA Council, by the SAA office, or by any SAA component group are official publications of the Society, whether they are posted to the main website, to a component group website, or to an auxiliary website. As such, these publications are subject to the records retention provisions outlined in Article VII of SAA’s Constitution. Individual comments regarding publications posted by members at large (and/or members of the public) to any portion of the SAA network do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the Society and are not regarded as SAA publications.
The content of all pages on the SAA website shall be related to the functions and mission of the Society of American Archivists, namely to serve the education and information needs of our members and provide leadership to help ensure the identification, preservation, and use of the nation’s historic record.
The entire SAA network, as defined above, is subject to the SAA Code of Conduct.
B. SAA Main Website
All documents published to SAA's main website are subject to the approval of the Executive Director. All submissions and/or suggestions for additions to the SAA main website shall be forwarded for consideration to the Executive Director or the Executive Director's designated staff representative(s).
The Executive Director or designee is responsible for the overall design, coding, formatting, and maintenance of the contents of the SAA main website. The Executive Director or designee should follow an appropriate style manual, such as the Chicago Manual of Style.
Links should be made from the main website to component group websites and to other professional associations of archivists or allied professions. Links to external sites comprising directories of archival websites, non-SAA web publications of archival interest, and such also are desirable. Links will not be made to websites describing individual archival repositories or their holdings.
SAA will maintain links to all auxiliary SAA student chapter websites.
C. SAA Component Group Websites
A complete list of official component groups will be published by the SAA office on the main website. Each component group will also have a homepage on the main website containing key leadership information, including a statement of the group’s charge and/or purpose, goals and/or duties, group bylaws (if applicable), links to official rosters of the group’s leaders and/or members, a link to the group’s official e-mail discussion list, and a link to the component group website, if applicable.
The SAA office will provide all SAA boards, committees, sections, roundtables, and working groups with a component group website that may be administered by authorized group leaders via SAA’s content management system. Group leaders are responsible for updating information maintained on component group websites. Subcommittees and task forces may also request a component group website, provision of which will be subject to approval by the Executive Director and dependent on the group’s articulation of a clear statement of purpose for the site that is directly germane to the responsibilities and concerns of that group.
Content published to component group websites will follow an appropriate style manual, such as the Chicago Manual of Style. Key leadership information published to the main website should not be republished to component group websites. Personal contact information of members and member leaders, including e-mail addresses, may not be published to any site that is accessible to Web crawlers and/or spam harvesters.
Group leaders will have primary creative control over the design and content of their component group websites, provided that no website may conflict with the SAA main website or with SAA policies and practices relating to publication, privacy and confidentiality, and ethical conduct. Groups are strongly encouraged to utilize the main website theme (e.g., header, footer, site search utility, and navigation elements) in order to promote usability and effective document retrieval. Groups that elect to design and display a custom theme must display:
D. E-mail Discussion Lists
The SAA office will provide all SAA boards, committees, sections, roundtables, and working groups with one or more e-mail discussion lists:
E. SAA Component Group Use of Social Media and External Websites (Auxiliary Sites) [Revised July 2012.]
SAA component groups may create accounts on social networks (such as Facebook and Twitter) and use social media tools (such as wikis, blogs and document-sharing sites). When considering establishing a new resource, component groups should be aware of the alternatives available to them and the associated roles and responsibilities.
SAA’s goals in establishing component group microsites within the Drupal content management system were as follows:
SAA recognizes, however, that component groups may have needs that cannot be met within the Drupal microsite environment. When this is the case, a component group may make use of other social media tools to accomplish its communication objectives.
Component groups wishing to create or populate an external web resource (including a social media account) must adhere to the following guidelines:
Component groups must display the uniform logo on all social media sites and external websites, in accordance with the policies articulated in Guidelines for Use of the SAA Logo.
These guidelines apply to both new and existing social media accounts and external websites. Component groups should review all existing accounts and websites and discuss them with their Council liaisons to ensure that they comply with these guidelines.
Adopted by the SAA Council: June 8, 1997; Revised: March 2007, February 2010, July 2012, July 2014; May 2016
Council Meeting 12/31/37 (The American Archivist 1:2)
Mailing list of the Society considered confidential, but exceptions for professional purposes at discretion of the Secretary
Council Meeting [Spring 1945] (The American Archivist 8:3)
Approved incorporation of the Society
Council Meeting 12/28/55 (The American Archivist 19:2)
Directed the Secretary to control issuance of stationery for committees in order to safeguard against unauthorized use in the name of the Society
Council Meeting 6/12/59 (The American Archivist 22:4)
Clarified its intent that only individual members be eligible for election as Fellows
Council Meeting 12/28/62 (The American Archivist 26:3)
Resolved that Council members are responsible for attending meetings and should resign if absent from two or more meetings in succession without sufficient personal reason
Council Meeting 10/2/63 (The American Archivist 27:1)
Designated Dolores Renze as the Society's archivist
Council Meeting 4/28/66 (The American Archivist 29:3)
Decided that Fellows whose dues are in arrears should retain their standing but not be counted in the 15% eligible for that class of membership, and that only members in good standing would receive The American Archivist and other perquisites of membership
Council Meeting 10/4/66 (The American Archivist 30:1)
Reaffirmed the policy that all candidates should be informed of the sites of future Council meetings, and of the necessity of attending those meetings; Council to retain the prerogative of asking a member to resign if frequently absent
Council Meeting 10/20/67 (The American Archivist 31:1)
Reaffirmed decision not to offer any reduction in price for subscription agencies handling The American Archivist
Council Meeting 12/28/67 (The American Archivist 31:2)
Reaffirmed the policy that solicitations for funds by SAA committees (including proposals for foundations) must receive prior Council approval
Council Meeting 9/29/68 (The American Archivist 32:1)
Recommended that the Society avoid, if possible, the selection of dates for the annual meeting that conflict with religious holidays
Council Meeting 12/30/69 (The American Archivist 33:2)
Changed the Society's archival repository to the University of Wisconsin and requested Dolores Renze to transfer the archives in her possession to Madison
Council Meeting 7/1-2/70 (The American Archivist 33:4)
Refused to endorse products by brand name
Approved a policy regarding SAA sponsorship of symposia, conferences, workshops, and other special meetings
Reiterated its policy that the dates of the annual meeting should not conflict with the Jewish holy days
Council Meeting 10/2/70 (The American Archivist 34:1)
Resolved that SAA officers make general decisions regarding the use of the SAA mailing list but that Council must give specific approval for any financial solicitation of SAA members using this list
Council Meeting 4/17-19/74 (The American Archivist 38:1)
Required that all SAA proposals for external financial support must be approved by Council before submission to funding agencies
Council Meeting 9/30/74 (The American Archivist 38:2)
Authorized Executive Director, in consultation with the Executive Committee, to prepare and submit grant proposals on behalf of the Society
Council Meeting 9/30/75 (The American Archivist 39:2)
Approved guidelines for SAA endorsements of grant projects
Business Meeting 10/1/75 (The American Archivist 39:1)
Prohibited smoking at all official SAA functions
Council Meeting 1/20/76 (The American Archivist 39:3)
Adopted guidelines for the establishment of SAA awards
Council Meeting 10/1/76 (The American Archivist 40:1)
Determined that SAA placement services would be available only to members
Council Meeting 10/4/77 (The American Archivist 41:1)
Voted to open Council meetings to members, with the proviso that Council by 2/3 vote of those present might go into executive session in order to discuss specific agenda items
Directed the Committee on Education and Professional Development to draft procedures for the accreditation of archival education programs
Council Meeting 10/6/77 (The American Archivist 41:1)
Formed a task force to consider extent and implications of current national information systems and to anticipate the role SAA might play in their implementation
Council Meeting 10/2/78 (The American Archivist 42:4)
Accepted offer of University of Wisconsin-Madison to serve as permanent depository of SAA's records
Council Meeting 10/17/82 (The American Archivist 46:2)
Resolved that an advisory committee for a grant-funded project should dissolve upon submission of the project's final report
Council Meeting 5/19-21/84 (The American Archivist 47:4)
Accepted Treasurer's recommendation that the Building Fund and the Endowment Fund be merged to form the Education Endowment Fund, whose interest would be available to further the educational goals of the Society
Business Meeting 9/1/84 (The American Archivist 48:1)
Approved a resolution to add $2 to registration fees for 1985 annual meeting to subsidize child care at the meeting
Urged avoiding scheduling the annual meeting on Saturday and Sunday mornings
Council Meeting 1/25-27/85 (The American Archivist 48:3)
Adopted child care resolution approved by the 1984 Business Meeting
Defeated annual meeting scheduling resolution approved by the 1984 Business Meeting
Created SAA Roundtables
Council Meeting 10/27/85 (The American Archivist 49:2)
Extended child care provisions to apply at 1986 annual meeting
Council Meeting 2/14-16/86 (The American Archivist 53:1)
Resolved that the SAA Representative to NHPRC be recommended by the President and approved by vote of the Council
Council Meeting 1/30-2/1/87 (The American Archivist 50:3)
Resolved that Council members and Officers should not serve as elected or appointed officials on other SAA bodies, "except where this service is specifically mandated"
Council Meeting 6/5-7/87 (The American Archivist 50:3)
Resolved that Officers and members of Council should not concurrently serve as paid employees of SAA, except to complete pre-existing contracts
Council Meeting 2/3-5/89 (The American Archivist 52:3)
Adopted three-year planning cycle for SAA and its constituent groups
Council Meeting 6/2-4/89 (The American Archivist 52:4)
Resolved that Officers and Council members should not serve as officers, steering committee members, or editors of SAA bodies and reaffirmed its position that Officers and Council members should not concurrently serve as paid employees of or contractors to the Society, with the exception that contracts let prior to election may be completed
Directed that the SAA Newsletter should refuse position announcements that are clearly inconsistent with the principles of non-discrimination and intellectual freedom
Council Meeting 10/24/89 (The American Archivist 52:4)
Voted to record names for all divided Council votes
Established a fixed relationship between individual and institutional dues rates
Council Meeting 2/23-25/90 (The American Archivist 54:1)
Adopted three financial goals:
1. That SAA create and maintain a balanced annual budget
2. Analyze and adjust revenue and expenditures in certain program areas as needed
3. Establish an adequate reserve fund
Council Meeting 6/22-24/90 (The American Archivist 53:3)
Adopted proposed rules for future business meetings
Broadened eligibility criteria for Distinguished Service Award
Restated criteria for J Franklin Jameson Archival Advocacy Award
Established Standards Board
Adopted new Bylaw regarding the schedule for sending dues notices
Adopted a proposal that Council review and prepare revisions to the dues structure at least every three years beginning in 1990
Council Meeting 8/29/90 (The American Archivist 54:2)
Voted to discontinue the Candidate Register as a member service
Business Meeting 9/2/90
Adopted a revision to Article IV of the SAA Constitution regarding payment of dues
Adopted new dues structure proposed by Council
Council Meeting 2/22-24/91 (The American Archivist 54:1)
Approved SAA membership in the National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
Modified criteria for Oliver Wendell Holmes Award and Philip M. Hamer and Elizabeth Hamer Kegan Award
Decided to hold a planning day immediately before the upcoming June Council meeting
Adopted modifications to guidelines for Sections and Roundtables
Resolved not to serve as a facilitator for consulting practices of third parties or individuals
Endorsed the publication of a directory of consultants
Established a standing committee to monitor legislative matters
Council Meeting 2/22-24/91 - continued
Endorsed the production of an encyclopedia of archives
Adopted a Statement on Liaison with Other Professional Groups
Council Meeting 6/14-16/91 (The American Archivist 54:3)
Adopted a policy for reimbursing Council members' expenses for attending Council meetings
Resolved that permanent paper be used for SAA publications when feasible
Adopted a process for choosing annual meeting sites
Adopted a set of procedures for grant proposals to be submitted by SAA
Established an Education Office Advisory Board to assist the Education Officer
Council Meeting 9/24/91 (The American Archivist 54:4)
Resolved that Section newsletters are a benefit of SAA membership (which allows individual members a choice of two Section memberships) and will not be offered by subscription to others
Resolved that Council members will purchase new SAA publications rather than receive complimentary copies
Adopted guidelines and a schedule for orienting new Council members
Adopted revisions to the guidelines for Committees, Sections, and Roundtables clarifying the policy regarding seeking funds from outside sources
Business Meeting 9/26/91
Adopted revisions to Article XI of the SAA Constitution regarding publications received in right of membership
Council Meeting 9/29/91 (The American Archivist 54:4)
Resolved that the current list of manuscript appraisers continue to be distributed by the SAA office at no charge while the new consultant directory is phased in
Council Meeting 1/24-26/92 (The American Archivist 55:2)
Approved an upgrade of the office computer system and resolved to review it within three year
Adopted a policy on payment for childcare at Annual Meetings
Adopted a policy on SAA support for various groups that meet at the SAA Annual Meeting
Amended the bylaws to add an additional elected Fellow to the Committee to Select SAA Fellows
Adopted an amendment to Article V of the Constitution regarding criteria for selection of Fellows
Council Meeting 6/12-14/92 (The American Archivist 55:3)
Established the position of intern on Standing Committees, Boards, Task Forces
Adopted a revised policy on choosing Annual Meeting sites
Affirmed that employment opportunities will appear only in the SAA Newsletter and the Employment Bulletin, not in any other newsletters of the Society
Resolved that officers and Council members shall not serve on SAA bodies
Decided to send Requests for Proposals to several association management firms
Council Meeting 9/12-17/92 (The American Archivist 55:4)
Voted to discontinue investigating association management firms
Established a Task Force on Sections and Roundtables
Business Meeting 9/16/92
Adopted an amendment to Article V of the SAA Constitution regarding criteria for selection of Fellows
Council Meeting 1/29-31/93 (The American Archivist 56:2)
Established a committee to conduct Executive Director Search
Adopted guidelines for childcare at the Annual Meetings
Established student chapters as a new structure within SAA
Established an award for publications on preservation
Council Meeting 6/11-13/93 (The American Archivist 56:4)
Decided to protect the SAA logo by registering it as a trademark
Council Meeting 8/31-9/4/93 (The American Archivist 56:4)
Established an award to support minority student attendance at the annual meeting.
Council Meeting 1/5-6/94
Established a mentoring program to assist new members
Established a separate Editorial Board for the American Archivist
Established an Electronic Records Section; dissolved the Committee on Automated Records and Techniques; established two task forces to recommend ways for the Society to address electronic records and automated techniques issues
Council Meeting 9/6-11/94
Passed a resolution regarding "Annual Meeting Conflict with Religious Holidays"
Passed a resolution authorizing funds for a staff retirement plan to be incorporated into the adoption of the annual budget
Council Meeting 10/24-25/38 (The American Archivist 2:2)
President to appoint and chair a committee on uniform state legislation concerning archives
Council Meeting 10/13/39 (The American Archivist 3:1)
Continued for another year the Committee on Uniform State Legislation and empowered it to submit a draft for a uniform public records law to the Committee on Scope and Program of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
Council Meeting 9/15/53 (The American Archivist 17:4)
Established a committee to examine and report on professional qualifications for archival work
Council Meeting 10/10/56 (The American Archivist 20:1)
Accepted in principle the President's report suggesting a national program "to insure the care and preservation of our archival heritage"
Council Meeting 10/7/60 (The American Archivist 24:2)
Resolved that Council should not intervene in professional dismissals except on written request of aggrieved member, with the matter to be referred to Committee on Professional Standards
Council Meeting 5/10/62 (The American Archivist 25:4)
Adopted policy statement on education and training of archivists
Council Meeting 4/23/65 (The American Archivist 28:3)
Requested President to ask Committee on Education and Training to consider SAA sponsorship of archival courses and the feasibility of certification of teachers of these courses
Council Meeting 10/4/66 (The American Archivist 30:1)
Endorsed the Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure of the American Association of University Professors
Council Meeting 12/28/66 (The American Archivist 30:2)
Approved a limited salary survey every two years, with comprehensive surveys to be completed every four or five years at the discretion of Council
Asked the Committee on Education and Professional Development to review the implications of its proposal that SAA accredit archival courses in colleges and universities, but encouraged it to proceed to compile a syllabus for use in introductory courses in archival management
Council Meeting 4/27/67 (The American Archivist 30:4)
Responding to a proposal that a separate organization for manuscript administrators be established, reiterated its policy opposing attempts to splinter the archival profession
Council Meeting 4/18/68 (The American Archivist 31:3)
Endorsed a proposal that the National Archives: conduct research and develop test methods dealing with the chemical stability of archival paper and related materials; develop specifications for these materials; and determine proper environmental conditions for archival paper records; established a Committee on Paper Research to cooperate in this endeavor
Council Meeting 4/5/72 (The American Archivist 35:3-4)
Expressed concern about ecological matters but also viewed with concern the use of recycled paper.
Council Meeting 12/28/72 (The American Archivist 36:2)
Approved resolution concerning the declassification of government records
Council Meeting 4/13/73 (The American Archivist 36:4)
Accepted a resolution on discrimination in the archival profession for presentation to business meeting
Business Meeting 9/27/73 (The American Archivist 37:1)
Resolved that SAA and its affiliated institutions are committed to eliminating discrimination in employment throughout the archival profession
Council Meeting 12/29/73 (The American Archivist 37:2)
Passed resolution supporting National Union Catalog of Manuscript Collections
Council Meeting 12/30/73 (The American Archivist 37:2)
Passed resolution urging a reduction in the time period before national security documents are declassified and recommending automatic declassification of all except the most highly sensitive ten years after their creation
Business Meeting 10/2/74 (The American Archivist 38:2)
Adopted resolution on public ownership of official records of elected or appointed public officials
Council Meeting 10/4/74 (The American Archivist 38:2)
Passed resolution expanding on business meeting's resolution regarding the public ownership of the official records of elected or appointed public officials and discussing policies on such ownership
Council Meeting 4/8/77 (The American Archivist 41:2)
Authorized publication of draft proposal and creation of formal procedures concerning certification of archivists and accreditation of archival training programs
Council Meeting 10/5/77 (The American Archivist 41:1)
Authorized Committee on Replevin to study implications of North Carolina decision on replevin
Council Meeting 10/6/78 (The American Archivist 42:2)
Gave highest priority to evaluation of archival education programs, as opposed to individual certification and institutional evaluation
Council Meeting 9/28/79 (The American Archivist 43:2)
Endorsed objectives of Joint AAM/AASLH/SAA Committee on Minority Training and Employment: to determine extent of training and employment and to develop plans to encourage greater participation of minorities; approved recommendation that possible sources of private funding for the Committee's work be explored
Council Meeting 10/3/80 (The American Archivist 44:3)
Approved resolution objecting to "Guidelines for Library Functions at the State Level," prepared by the Chief Officers of State Library Agencies
Council Meeting 1/24-26/81 (The American Archivist 44:4)
Passed resolution supporting Native American Archives Project
Council Meeting 9/4/81 (The American Archivist 45:2)
Urged archival facility, at an appropriate site, for research into records of Nixon Administration
Council Meeting 8/29/84 (The American Archivist 48:2)
Asked ALA/SAA Joint Committee to explore ongoing collaboration to recognize archives as well as libraries during National Library Week and International Archives Week
Council Meeting 9/2/84 (The American Archivist 48:2)
Supported NAGARA activities to encourage a congressional initiative to conserve archival records
Council Meeting 1/25-27/85 (The American Archivist 48:3)
Identified certain qualities that an Archivist of the United States should possess
Supported Women's History Week
Council Meeting 6/7-9/85 (The American Archivist 49:1)
Expressed concern about the potential impact on archives of a reorganization at the National Endowment for the Humanities
Council Meeting 10/27/85 (The American Archivist 49:2)
Endorsed the concept of a National Congress on Historical Records to commemorate the bicentennial of the United States Constitution
Council Meeting 8/25/86 (The American Archivist 50:1)
Endorsed legislation proposing a White House Conference on Libraries and Information Services and recommended that the conference explore the relationship between records and the themes of democracy, productivity, and literacy
Council Meeting 1/30-2/1/87 (The American Archivist 50:3)
Established an Interim Board for Certification to implement certification and recertification of archivists
Council Meeting 9/1/87 (The American Archivist 51:1-2)
Subject to clarification, endorsed concept of a Documentary Heritage Trust
Council Meeting 2/26-27/88 (The American Archivist 51:3)
Directed the Interim Board for Certification to implement the plan that it devised
Council Meeting 9/27/88 (The American Archivist 52:2)
Accepted "An Action Agenda for the Archival Profession," prepared by the Committee on Goals and Priorities
Council Meeting 6/2-4/89 (The American Archivist 52:4)
Endorsed the concept of "entitled" graduate education programs
Council Meeting 10/24/89 (The American Archivist 52:4)
Endorsed a Senate resolution on permanent paper
Council Meeting 10/28/89 (The American Archivist 52:4)
Endorsed in principle a nationwide archival preservation policy
Council Meeting 6/22-24/90 (The American Archivist 53:3)
Adopted a policy statement on the closing of an archives
Council Meeting 9/12/92 (The American Archivist 55:4)
Adopted a revised Code of Ethics for Archivists
Business Meeting 9/3/92
Adopted a resolution in support of continued open access to graduate dissertations and theses.
Council Meeting 1/5-6/94
Adopted guidelines for the evaluation of archival institutions
Secretary's Report 10/24-25/38 (The American Archivist 2:1)
Encouraged the gathering of local groups but requested that their organizers inform the Secretary of their plans and activities
Council Meeting 3/20/55 (The American Archivist 18:3)
Resolved approval of archives courses at American University and urged administrators to consider its graduates
Council Meeting 5/22/58 (The American Archivist 21:4)
Agreed in principle to participate in the work of the American Standards Association's Sectional Committee in the field of library work and documentation ("Z39")
Council Meeting 12/28/65 (The American Archivist 29:2)
Recommended Robert Bahmer as Archivist of the United States
Council Meeting 4/27/67 (The American Archivist 30:4)
Approved procedures governing the Joint Committee on the Status of the National Archives
Council Meeting 10/18/67 (The American Archivist 31:1)
Directed the Secretary to explore joint meetings with AASLH and other professional organizations
Council Meeting 12/28/67 (The American Archivist 31:2)
Endorsed a statement dealing with the importance and independence of the National Archives
Continued the Joint Committee on the Status of the National Archives
Council Meeting 4/18/68 (The American Archivist 31:3)
Endorsed James B. Rhoads for Archivist of the United States
Council Meeting 9/29/68 (The American Archivist 32:1)
Did not approve a proposal, from the Society of Ohio Archivists, for the creation of state or regional chapters, and for SAA to collect dues for local chapters
Urged strengthening of and autonomy for the National Archives
Council Meeting 10/2/68 (The American Archivist 32:1)
Registered approbation of the formation of the Society of Ohio Archivists
Council Meeting 12/29/68 (The American Archivist 32:2)
Urged the incoming President of the United States to retain the incumbent Archivist of the United States
Council Meeting 12/30/69 (The American Archivist 33:2)
Expressed concern regarding charges by Professor Lowenheim regarding unethical conduct by the Roosevelt Library, offered to cooperate with AHA and OAH in an investigation of these charges, and created an ad hoc committee to study professional ethics
Council Meeting 7/1-2/70 (The American Archivist 33:4)
Disagreed with the AHA-OAH committee investigating the Lowenheim matter regarding the involvement of archivists in the investigation and emphasized the need for such involvement
Council Meeting 9/29/70 (The American Archivist 34:1)
Accepted an invitation from ALA to create a joint committee but specified that the chair should alternate between the two organizations
Urged that the joint AHA-OAH report on the Lowenheim matter be made public as soon as possible
Council Meeting 12/29/70 (The American Archivist 34:2)
Voted to explore creation of a joint standing committee, drawn from AHA, OAH, and SAA, in order to relieve growing misunderstanding and tension between historians and archivists
Council Meeting 10/15/71 (The American Archivist 35:1)
Voted to ask Congress to increase appropriations for NHPRC
Council Meeting 10/30/72 (The American Archivist 36:2)
Endorsed the suggestion of the Committee for the 1970s that SAA establish closer relationships with local archival organizations
Council Meeting 12/28/72 (The American Archivist 36:2)
Approved revised guidelines, submitted by the Joint AHA/OAH/SAA Committee on Historians and Archivists, for the adjudication of disputes between historians and archivists
Council Meeting 10/3/75 (The American Archivist 39:2)
Endorsed independent status for the National Archives
Council Meeting 4/9/76 (The American Archivist 40:1)
Accepted an invitation from the Institute of Certified Records Managers to sponsor program and to designate a member of the Board of Regents
Council Meeting 10/1/76 (The American Archivist 40:1)
Adopted resolution supporting re-establishment of National Archives as independent authority, appointment of archivists based on professional criteria, and creation of a governing board to oversee programs of National Archives
Approved SAA participation in ARMA/SAA joint committee, with three SAA members having two-year terms (renewable once)
Council Meeting 10/5/77 (The American Archivist 41:1)
Approved resolution urging the Governor, Legislature, and State Historical Board of Iowa to establish a state archivist and provide for a state archives building that meets adequate standards
Council Meeting 4/14/78 (The American Archivist 42:1)
Authorized liaison between SAA and NAGARA
Authorized application for membership in ACLS
Council Meeting 4/24/79 (The American Archivist 42:4)
Accepted invitation to designate a representative to a working group to revise the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules
Urged Congress to approve a new facility for the National Archives
Business Meeting 9/26/79 (The American Archivist 43:1)
Deplored prospective termination of West Virginia Division of Archives and History
Council Meeting 1/28/80 (The American Archivist 43:3)
Passed resolution calling for qualified and independent Archivist of the United States and for preserving the integrity of our national documentary heritage through the consistent application of the principles of the archival profession
Council Meeting 1/23-25/82 (The American Archivist 45:2)
Urged comprehensive oversight hearings on program activity and management of the National Archives and Records Services, with no reorganization by the General Services Administration until the hearings could be completed and Congress could make program decisions
Council Meeting 10/22/82 (The American Archivist 46:2)
Urged the Office of Personnel Management to amend proposed standards to emphasize academic training as a basic requirement for archivists within the National Archives and Records Service
Council Meeting 1/22-23/83 (The American Archivist 46:3)
Passed a resolution deploring a threat to the PBS archives
Council Meeting 10/27/85 (The American Archivist 49:2)
Encouraged coordination with State Historical Records Coordinators Steering Committee in the development of a statement outlining elements of a national historical records program
Council Meeting 6/13-15/86 (The American Archivist 50:1)
Decided to apply for membership in the Library of Congress Network Advisory Committee
Approved a resolution opposing the nomination of John Agresto as Archivist of the United States
Business Meeting 8/28/86 (The American Archivist 49:4)
Opposed nomination of John Agresto as Archivist of the United States
Council Meeting 9/1/87 (The American Archivist 51:1-2)
Voted to have SAA join the Archives and Records Information Coalition
Council Meeting 6/10-12/88 (The American Archivist 51:4)
Encouraged closer affiliation with American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works
Council Meeting 10/28/89 (The American Archivist 52:4)
Approved creation of a joint committee with the Association of Records Managers and Administrators
Council Meeting 6/22-24/90 (The American Archivist 53:3)
Adopted a position paper on the leadership role of the National Archives and Records Administration
Council Meeting 2/22-24/91 (The American Archivist 54:1)
Agreed to jointly sponsor with ALA an award to the developers of neutral sizing
Declined to join the National History Education Network
Council Meeting 6/15/91 (The American Archivist 54:3)
Approved membership in the National Information Standards Organization
Business Meeting 9/26/91
Adopted a resolution opposing the closing of the Colorado State Archives
Business Meeting 9/16/92
Adopted a resolution in support of reauthorization for the National Historical Publications and Records Commission
Council Meeting 9/17/92 (The American Archivist 55:4)
Established an official representative to the Bureau of Canadian Archives Committee on Descriptive Standards
Council Meeting 1/29-31/93 (The American Archivist 56:2)
Adopted resolutions on the National Archives and Records Administration calling for : authorization legislation, increased support, and an advisory board
Council Meeting 6/11-13/93 (The American Archivist 56:4)
Adopted a resolution supporting the Library of Congress in keeping open the Thurgood Marshall Papers
Council Meeting 1/5-6/94
Approved SAA's participation in ALA's federated process for accrediting graduate programs
Business Meeting 10/25/46 (The American Archivist 10:1)
Adopted resolution urging creation of the International Archives Council and authorized President to bring about its establishment
Recommended that the United Nations establish an effective international archival agency with an adequate staff of professionally competent archivists
Business Meeting 9/4/47 (The American Archivist 11:1)
Recorded the special concern of the Society in the continued and expanded interest of UNESCO in archival work
Special Business Meeting 10/29/48 (The American Archivist 12:1)
Voted two-year financial support (including both SAA and voluntary contributions by members) of the International Council on Archives
Business Meeting 9/20/49 (The American Archivist 13:1)
Voted to continue financial support of the International Council on Archives
Council Meeting 4/28/66 (The American Archivist 29:3)
Resolved that the Archivist of the United States should represent the United States in voting on resolutions presented at the Extraordinary Congress of the International Council on Archives
Council Meeting 10/8/66 (The American Archivist 30:1)
Urged the United States delegation to UNESCO to support an increase in financial support for the International Council on Archives
Council Meeting 10/22/82 (The American Archivist 46:2)
Called to the attention of the International Council on Archives the situation concerning the archives of the research center of the Palestine Liberation Organization
Approved a resolution calling for the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. to agree to limit nuclear testing and stockpiles
Council Meeting 5/19-21/84 (The American Archivist 47:4)
Urged continuing U.S. support for UNESCO's Records and Archives Management Program, and similar programs of assistance to archives and information programs in developing nations
Council Meeting 9/2/84 (The American Archivist 48:2)
Noted with concern the fate of the cultural records of the Grenadian Government
Council Meeting 6/11-13/93 (The American Archivist 56:4)
Urged governments around the world to provide timely and equitable access to their records