Adopted by the Council: January 1995
Revised: July 2013
1 The source for Sections VII.A and B. is the Bylaws of the Society of American Archivists, Bylaw 6.
I. Purpose
Revised in January 2003, the charge of the joint committee is:
The ALA/SAA/AAM Joint Committee on Archives, Libraries, and Museums consists of 15 members, five from each association, with co-chairs appointed by each association biennially for two-year terms.
See also: The CALM Wiki
I. Purpose
The Editorial Board advises and assists the Editor of American Archivist in the editorial review and production of the journal and in establishing and implementing editorial policies and procedures for peer review of submitted manuscripts.
The Editorial Board also assists with the evaluation of the Journal Editor as requested by the Council.
II. Board Size, Length of Terms, and Selection
The Editorial Board consists of the Editor, who serves as chair of the board, the Reviews Editor, and twelve individual board members.
The Editor is appointed by the Council. The Editor's term is three years and customarily begins on or about January 1; however, the exact date on which the individual selected assumes the responsibilities of editorship is negotiated by the individual and the Executive Director. An incumbent Editor may be re-appointed for one additional term as Editor. An individual may not serve more than two consecutive terms, but may apply for the position at a later time.
The Reviews Editor is appointed for a three-year term by the Editor. The Reviews Editor may serve no more than two consecutive terms. The Reviews Editor is selected based on demonstrated excellent writing and editorial skills and knowledge of current research and writing in the archives field.
The twelve individuals comprising the board are appointed for four-year terms that are staggered so that one-fourth are appointed each year. At least one member of the Editorial Board shall be an international representative (that is, an individual who lives and works outside of the United States). Board members are nominated by the Editor and appointed by the SAA Vice President based on the list of nominees. In the event that the Vice President is unable to appoint a person nominated by the Editor, the Vice President asks the Editor to nominate another person for appointment. Individuals serving on the Editorial Board are selected because of their knowledge of archival theory, methodology, and practice; expertise in research strategies and methodologies; and experience in archival research and publication.
The Editorial Board also reflects a diversity of archival institutions and functional expertise and the demographic and geographic breadth of the profession. An individual may serve no more than two consecutive terms on the board.
The chair of the Publications Board serves as an ex officio member of the Editorial Board.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
A. The Editor
The Editor coordinates Editorial Board activities. To maintain the editorial independence of the journal as a peer-refereed professional journal, the Editor manages the manuscript review process and makes final decisions for publication. The Editor is responsible for the solicitation, selection, peer review, and final approval of articles, features, and photographs. He or she works with authors and prospective authors on necessary revisions, reviews page proofs before publication, and works closely with the Reviews Editor, a copyeditor, an indexer, and the SAA staff, who handle journal production and business matters.
The Editor uses the Editorial Board listserv as the principal means of communication with the Editorial Board about editorial activities, including, but not limited to, statistical summary of submissions and decisions about submissions, negotiations for special issues, special achievements, problems and needs, and suggestions for Editorial Board policies.
The Editor also serves as an ex officio member of the Publications Board.
B. Reviews Editor
The Reviews Editor works in conjunction with the Editor to commission review essays; selects books and exhibits (print and online) to review; assembles, maintains, and refreshes a stable of reviewers; assigns items to be reviewed and oversees the reviews process; and edits copy for the reviews section in each issue of the journal.
C. Individual Board Members
Individual Editorial Board members assist the Editor in developing and implementing editorial policies and procedures, encouraging submissions and soliciting manuscripts to be considered for publication in American Archivist, promoting content from current and recent issues, recommending other manuscript reviewers, reviewing manuscript submissions for possible publication in the journal, and contributing as needed with reviews of professional literature and resources.
Individual board members also assist with the review of the Editor’s performance and may assist in the search for a new Editor.
D. SAA Office
The SAA office coordinates production aspects of the journal and handles business matters, including:
IV. Meetings
The Editorial Board meets at least annually during SAA’s Annual Meeting.
The SAA Executive Director, Director of Publishing, and Editorial and Production Coordinator customarily participate in all meetings of the Editorial Board.
V. Budget
The Council, as part of its budget process, approves the budget (prepared by the SAA office) for American Archivist.
VI. Reporting and Editor Performance Evaluation Procedures
The Editor reports to the Council. The Editor submits a report three times a year in advance of each Council meeting. The report includes a summary of the Editor’s activities, the production of the journal, issues and concerns, and any changes to editorial policies and procedures.
The following procedures apply to the annual performance evaluation of the Editor, which isbased on performance criteria, goals and objectives, and a formal review process. The purpose of this process is to form a basis for considering renewal of the Editor’s contract, to provide feedback to the Editor, to discuss issues of common concern, and to recognize achievements. The Executive Director establishes a schedule for this evaluation process based on a timetable for renegotiation of the contract with the Editor.
The Executive Director shares with the Editor the statement of criteria for performance evaluation, stipulating elements considered appropriate and relevant for evaluating the Editor's performance on an annual basis. This statement must be reviewed and approved by the Council.
The Executive Director solicits written and/or oral comments on the Editor’s performance from the Editorial Board, Council liaison, various SAA staff, three authors who have recently published in the journal, an author in the process of publishing in the journal, and any others who are in a position to provide useful perspectives. Also to be considered are comments received from SAA members or any other information that the Council deems appropriate. The Editor also completes a self-evaluation.
The Executive Director compiles all feedback received and disseminates this information to the Editor and the Council. The Council reviews the feedback regarding the Editor's performance and takes appropriate action. If feasible, the Council conducts a conference call with the Editor; otherwise, the Council conveys conclusions to the Executive Director to share directly with the Editor.
In years in which the incumbent Editor is eligible for reappointment, the Executive Director contacts the incumbent Editor to determine if he or she is interested in serving a second term. If the Editor expresses such an interest, the matter is referred to the Council for evaluation. The Council makes a recommendation regarding reappointment of the Editor or directs the Executive Director to implement a search for a new Editor as outlined in VII. Editor Search Process.
VII. Editor Search Process
In years in which the incumbent Editor is ineligible for reappointment, is not offered reappointment, or chooses not to serve a second term, the Council and staff work together to conduct a search for a new Editor.
A. Qualifications of Editor
The Editor of American Archivist possesses the following qualifications:
B. Search Committee
In January of the year prior to the expiration of the incumbent Editor's term of office, the Executive Director:
The search committee reviews the applications, interviews candidates, and makes a recommendation to the Council on the selection of an Editor. (Should the search committee believe that there are no qualified candidates, or that additional qualified candidates are desirable, the committee is empowered to solicit additional nominations to supplement those already received.)
The Council, with due consideration of the selection committee's recommendation, makes the final decision.
Approved by the Council: February 5, 2005.
Revised: May 2014; June 2019.
I. Purpose
The Appointments Committee assists the vice-president/president-elect with the appointment process by identifying a pool of potential candidates for appointed positions to committees, boards, and tasks forces, and to official SAA representative positions. The Committee uses the volunteer self-nomination form, for those members who wish to be considered for appointments, and consults with current appointed group chairs for possible candidates. The Committee surveys the overall list of current and potential appointments to achieve quality, balance, and diversity of appointees both overall and within each unit. At the same time, the committee maintains an openness to appointing new people, especially through the early-career member program.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The committee consists of three to six members (including the committee chair and vice chair). The newly elected SAA vice president confirms the committee chair and appoints the vice chair prior to the Annual Meeting at which s/he takes office. The vice chair serves a one-year term. After the Annual Meeting, and upon confirmation, the vice-chair shall automatically serve as committee chair for a one-year term. Regular committee members serve for one-year to assist in the appointment process. Membership should reflect the diverse groups represented within SAA.
The immediate past chair of the Appointments Committee shall serve on the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows for a one-year term.
III. Reporting Procedures
After consulting the list of volunteers and leaders' recommendations, theCommittee prepares a list of possible candidates for each committee, task force, board, or representative position to assist the vice president in selecting nominees for these posts. The Vice President is responsible for contacting nominees to confirm acceptance of the appointment.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Appointments Committee is responsible for the following:
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1998. Revised: November 2016, May 2022, November 2023.
I. Purpose
The Archival Repatriation Committee works to ensure that the organization's services, activities, policies, communications, and products support the goal of supporting archivists in repatriating and receiving archival materials. It coordinates with various SAA entities, external organizations, and originating communities and monitors, evaluates, advocates for, and reports on matters relating to the repatriation of archival materials.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The committee consists of six members and two co-chairs, who are appointed by the SAA vice president/president-elect. The immediate past chair of the Native American Archives Section serves as a committee member for a one-year term. Committee members serve staggered three-year terms. The co-chairs shall serve staggered two-year terms. The vice president/president-elect shall appoint one committee member after consultation with the executive director of the Association of Tribal Archives, Libraries, and Museums.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
IV. Reporting Procedures
The Repatriation Committee reports to the Council and works closely with its Council liaison, the President, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council’s needs. The chair is responsible for submitting an annual report to the Council, and may also submit items for Council action or discussion and feedback as necessary. The chair also is responsible for ensuring that minutes of Repatriation Committee meetings are prepared and posted on the Repatriation Committee’s SAA-hosted website to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping requirements.
V. Meetings
The committee shall meet virtually as needed to conduct its work. The committee may conduct its business by email, telephone, or virtual meeting during the course of the year.
Approved by the SAA Council, May 2022.
I. Purpose
The Awards Committee has five major purposes:
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Awards Committee is composed of two committee co-chairs and the chairs of each of the awards subcommittees.
Annually the vice president/president-elect appoints one Awards Committee co-chair, who serves for one year as junior co-chair and one year as senior co-chair.
The selection, size, and length of term of each subcommittee is determined by the Council upon adoption of a new award and may be modified by the Council. Generally subcommittees comprise three members, each of whom serves for three years and as subcommittee chair in her/his third year. To ensure that appropriate expertise is represented on certain awards subcommittees, however, the Council has determined the following exceptions:
III. Reporting Procedures
Awards are announced during the SAA Annual Meeting, and on the SAA website and in the newsletter following the Annual Meeting. The co-chairs represent the Committee when meeting with other SAA committees and with the SAA Council and staff.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Awards Committee publicizes SAA awards through announcements in the SAA newsletter and in other publications as appropriate. It also may publicize the awards during SAA Annual Meetings or conduct other activities to make archivists more aware of SAA awards. The Committee also solicits nominations for SAA awards by contacting individuals, archives organizations, and other groups that may be aware of worthy nominees.
The Committee establishes a deadline for awards nominations to be sent to the committee chair. The Awards co-chairs distribute nominations to the appropriate subcommittee. Each subcommittee evaluates nominations it receives on the basis of written criteria and selects award winner(s) as appropriate. Policy questions regarding criteria or eligibility for an award may be directed to the Awards co-chairs, the SAA Executive Director, or the Council for clarification.
The Awards co-chairs, in conjunction with the Awards Committee and the SAA Executive Director, plan an appropriate awards ceremony for the SAA Annual Meeting. Typically the ceremony is led by the Awards Committee senior co-chair, with each subcommittee chair presenting the award for which he/she is responsible. In addition to presenting the award, the subcommittee chair prepares an awards citation that may be read at the ceremony.
From time to time, the Committee reviews awards criteria and procedures and recommends any revisions that may be appropriate. The Committee may recommend new awards for the Council's consideration. The Committee also evaluates awards and changes to guidelines proposed by members of the Society and makes recommendations to the Council concerning the proposals. Should new awards be approved, the Awards Committee is responsible for drafting appropriate award criteria and procedures.
V. Meetings
The Committee meets at the Society's Annual Meeting.
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1988
Revised: January 1993, January 2007, August 2011
See also
I. Purpose
The Committee on Education has four complementary purposes: 1) to assess the profession's educational needs; 2) to prepare and promote standards for archival education programs based in graduate schools; 3) to prepare and promote post-appointment and continuing education and training programs; and 4) to provide advice to the SAA Education Office.
The Committee on Education's work is based on the following assumptions:
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Committee on Education consists of eleven members (including a chair, vice chair, and immediate past chair) appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms. The vice chair is appointed by the Vice President normally from among the committee members serving the second year of their appointment. The vice chair assumes the chair in his or her third year on the committee. Following their term as chair, the immediate past chair shall serve an additional one-year term as an ex officio member of the committee. The chair of the Digital Archives Specialist Subcommittee and the SAA Education Director serve as ex officio members of the committee.
The membership of the committee shall include a mix of archival educators and practicing archivists with expertise in one or more of the ACE categories and in continuing education development.
The vice chair of the Committee on Education serves as an ex officio member of the Theodore Calvin Pease Award Subcommittee of the SAA Awards Committee and as an informal advisor to the Students and New Archives Professionals Section.
III. Reporting Procedures
The committee reports to the Council, providing a formal written report in the fall of each year and reporting on special initiatives as necessary or requested.
The committee works closely with the Education Director, serving in an advisory capacity in education-related projects and programs operated out of the executive office.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee on Education's charge is to review the needs for continuing education, assist the SAA Education Office in developing relevant programming, and provide guidance to the Society in this area. The tasks and responsibilities of the Committee include:
V. Meetings
The committee meets at the SAA Annual Meeting. The committee shall meet monthly; additional mid-year meetings are scheduled depending on the availability of financial resources.
Approved by the SAA Council: August 2008
Revised: January 1992, January 1998, May 2005, August 2008, May 2011, November 2016, May 2022.
I. Purpose
The Digital Archives Specialist (DAS) Subcommittee is responsible for ensuring that the Digital Archives Specialist curriculum remains up-to-date. Because the curriculum is likely to require frequent changes, the Subcommittee suggests and implements changes to the curriculum (including the examinations) as needed. In addition, the Subcommittee is responsible for ensuring the currency of the core competencies for a DAS certificate, overseeing the learning outcomes to ensure that they support the core competencies, and supporting the development of new courses.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Digital Archives Specialist (DAS) Subcommittee consists of ten members (including a chair) appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered four-year terms. Each year, a vice chair will be appointed from among the upcoming second-year members and will serve as vice chair in the second year, as chair in the third year, and as past chair in the fourth year of her/his term. The subcommittee chair serves as an ex officio member of the Committee on Education. The SAA Education Director serves as an ex officio member of the subcommittee.
The membership of the subcommittee shall comprise a mix of practicing archivists with e-records/digital experience and or knowledge, teaching experience, technical skills, expertise covering the archival spectrum, and administrative or supervisory experience. Ideally, the subcommittee as a whole will reflect individual and institutional diversity. The majority of members must have a DAS certificate to serve on the subcommittee. Exceptions may be made on a case-by-case basis.
Outgoing committee members will be granted a two-year grace period to allow adequate time for the necessary requirements to maintain and renew their DAS Certificate. Subcommittee members may not sit for the DAS Comprehensive Exam during their term on the subcommittee and must wait at least two year after their term ends to sit for the exam. Courses for which a committee member serves as a course shepherd (i.e. liaison) do not apply toward DAS Certificate renewal.
Members can expect to spend four to five hours per month on subcommittee work.
III. Reporting Procedures
The subcommittee reports to the Committee on Education, providing updates at each meeting and intermittently as appropriate.
The subcommittee works closely with the Education Director, serving in an advisory capacity on education-related projects and programs operated out of the executive office.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
V. Meetings
When resources are available, the subcommittee meets up to two times each year and via monthly conference calls.
Approved by the SAA Council: May 2011
Revised: April 2012, January 2014, June 2016, February 2017, May 2017.
I. Purpose
The Graduate Archival Education Subcommittee of the Committee on Education is charged with reviewing needs for graduate archival education, drafting and promulgating guidelines, and providing guidance to the Society in this area. The Subcommittee establishes its own agenda in conjunction with the Committee on Education, except as otherwise directed by the Council to perform specific tasks. Due to resource limitations, SAA and the GAE do not address accreditation issues.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The subcommittee consists of six members (including a chair and vice chair) appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms. The vice chair is appointed by the SAA Vice President normally from among the subcommittee members serving in the second year of appointment. The vice chair assumes the chair in her or his third year on the subcommittee.
The membership of the subcommittee shall include five archival educators and a student or new professional, all selected with an eye to including expertise, perspective, and community input from around the profession. The chair may bring on ad hoc volunteers for expertise as required. The chair serves as a member of the Committee on Education and as a liaison to the Archival Educators Section.
III. Reporting Procedures
The subcommittee reports to the Committee on Education. The subcommittee chair or designee provides updates during Committee conference calls and attends the Committee’s in-person meetings.
The subcommittee works closely with the Education Director, serving in an advisory capacity on education-related projects and programs operated out of the Executive Office.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Graduate Archival Education Subcommittee is charged with reviewing needs for graduate archival education, drafting and promulgating guidelines, and providing guidance to the Society in this area. Duties and responsibilities include:
V. Meetings
The Graduate Archival Education Subcommittee meets via monthly conference calls and may conduct in-person meetings when a need is demonstrated and financial resources are available.
Approved by the SAA Council: November 2016.
I. Purpose
The Committee on Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) advocates for and addresses issues related to ethical and professional conduct within the archival profession. CEPC supports and promotes the creation of education and outreach resources and programing relating to the Code of Ethics for Archivists and the Core Values of Archivists statement and periodically reviews each document for currency.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The CEPC consists of six members appointed by the SAA vice president for staggered three-year terms. Typically, two members are appointed annually. Two of the six members serve as co-chairs during their last two years on the committee. In consultation with the co-chairs, the SAA vice president appoints a junior co-chair from among the rising second-year committee members each year for a two-year term, so that the terms of the two co-chairs are staggered. Additionally, an Early-Career member will serve a one-year term. The co-chairs work with SAA personnel to select this member from the applicants.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
IV. Reporting Procedures
CEPC reports to the Council and works closely with its Council liaison, the President, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council’s needs. The co-chairs are responsible for submitting an annual report to the Council, and may also submit items for Council action or discussion and feedback as necessary. The co-chairs also are responsible for ensuring that minutes of CEPC meetings are prepared and posted on the CEPC’s SAA-hosted website to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping requirements.
Last Revised: June 2009; May 2014: July 2023
I. Purpose
The Committee provides strategic information and advice to the SAA Council to enhance SAA’s capacity to promote the value of archives and archivists to institutions, communities, and society. The Committee recommends to the SAA Council the public awareness priorities on which SAA should focus its attention and resources, within the context of the Society’s mission and strategic plan. In addition, the Committee works with staff and outside counsel to develop programs that promote the value and role(s) of archivists and archives nationwide.
The Committee on Public Awareness (COPA) is distinguished from the Committee on Advocacy and Public Policy (CAPP) by virtue of the audiences with which each group generally interacts and whose opinions it seeks to influence. CAPP generally is concerned with influencing legislative and regulatory (i.e., public policy) decisions of government at all levels; COPA generally is concerned with influencing opinions about the value of archivists and archives among the general public and stakeholder groups other than legislators and regulators (e.g., archives users, institutional resource allocators, etc.). The two committees may collaborate on identification of key audiences, messages, and mediums to ensure a coordinated approach to SAA’s priorities and communications.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term:
The Committee consists of eight members (including a chair and vice chair) who are appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms. The individual who is selected by the Vice President as vice chair, typically from among the third-year members, becomes vice chair in the fourth year of service and accedes to chair in the fifth year. Individuals may be reappointed to the Committee.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee has the following duties and responsibilities:
A. Acting proactively, the Committee:
B. Acting in cooperation with other organizations and groups:
C. Acting in response to requests or events, the Committee:
IV. Reporting
The Committee works closely with the President, its Council Liaison, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council's needs and is working in coordination with the staff office. In certain cases, when time is of the essence, Committee communications with the President and Executive Director may be discussed and acted upon solely by the Executive Committee.
Adopted by the SAA Council: March 17, 2014.
I. Purpose
The Committee’s purpose is to provide strategic information and advice to the SAA Council to enhance SAA’s capacity to address public policy issues and concerns affecting archivists, archives, the archival profession, and its stakeholders. The Committee recommends to the SAA Council the public policy priorities on which SAA should focus its attention and resources, within the context of the Society’s mission and strategic plan. Although the Committee's purview is broad, its overarching priorities are issues related to the preservation of and access to records of enduring value that affect archivists, archival institutions, and users of the archival record.
II. Size, Composition, Selection, and Length of Terms
The Committee consists of eight members. Six members are appointed by the SAA Vice President for staggered three-year terms; a vice chair and chair serve one-year terms.
The SAA Vice President appoints a vice chair from among the Committee members serving in their third year. That individual serves a fourth year as vice chair and accedes to chair in the fifth year. Individuals may be reappointed to the Committee.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee has the following duties and responsibilities:
A. Acting proactively, the Committee:
B. Acting in response to requests or events, the Committee:
IV. Reporting
The Committee works closely with the President, its Council Liaison, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council's needs and is working in coordination with the staff office. In certain cases, when time is of the essence, Committee communications with the President and Executive Director may be discussed and acted upon solely by the Executive Committee.
Approved by the SAA Council: September 2013
Name change to Committee on Public Policy (COPP) approved by the SAA Council: May 2016
I. Purpose
The Committee on Research, Data, and Assessment provides access to significant and useful data and research about SAA, American archives, and their users that evidence the value of archives for society and help us improve our services to SAA members and to our consumers. The Committee will work to conduct or support relevant research and to create, gather, and preserve data by directing and engaging in several areas of activity:
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Committee shall consist of a minimum of eleven appointed members (including two co-chairs) serving staggered three-year terms with the possibility of reappointment. The Vice President, on behalf of the Council and with the recommendation of the Committee, appoints new members and co-chairs. Because the Committee may benefit from members who possess specialized skills and abilities that may vary from time to time, a Request for Applicant-based process may be necessary to help surface the best candidates in any particular appointment cycle. Maximum Committee size is variable, depending on the number, nature, and complexity of the projects and activities in which the Committee is engaged at any particular time.
To better facilitate the Committee’s diverse work, members may be distributed among multiple project- or activity-based subcommittees, each of which is headed by a subcommittee chair appointed by the Committee co-chairs to repeatable annual terms. The Committee co-chairs may recommend that the SAA Council form (and disband) subcommittees from time to time, based on current needs.
The vice chair of the Committee on Education will serve as an ex officio member of the committee. The outgoing co-chair may serve as an ex officio member of the committee for up to one year after rotating off the committee.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Committee co-chairs shall submit a report for each Council meeting, summarizing current activities and projects and progress toward stated objectives. As directed by the Council, the Committee co-chairs may submit a written report upon the conclusion of specific projects.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee shall enjoy a great deal of latitude in developing and engaging in research projects and data accumulation. In so doing, the Committee must maintain frequent communication with the Council, which approves and advises on the Committee’s strategic directions, tactics, resources, activities, and projects. This communication is facilitated by the Committee co-chairs, who must ensure that the Council is aware of emergent planning and directional changes.
The Committee maintains responsibility for achieving its purpose by:
V. Meetings
The Committee shall conduct its business largely through email and conference calls. The Committee shall meet formally each year at the SAA Annual Meeting. Any additional in-person meetings that may be necessary shall occur only with Council approval and funding.
Approved by the SAA Council, November 2018, May 2022, August 2022.
I. Purpose
The Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows selects Fellows of the Society in accordance with criteria and procedures established and approved by the Council and in accordance with the Society's Constitution and Bylaws. From time to time the committee also performs other tasks assigned by the Council.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The committee is composed of the three most recent past presidents of the Society, three Fellows who are elected by the Council at its winter meeting and who serve one-year terms, and the immediate past chairs of the Appointments Committee and the Nominating Committee to serve one-year terms. Current members of the committee, current members of the Council, and Society staff members are not eligible for election. The past president who has served the longest on the committee serves as chair of the committee.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows elects new Fellows from individuals nominated by members of the Society. Individual members, primary contacts of institutional members, student members, and associate members are eligible to nominate SAA Fellows. The committee establishes a deadline for receipt of nominations well in advance of the Annual Meeting and develops a standard form for use in nominations in consultation with the Executive Director. The committee also ensures that the deadline is publicized and that the form is readily available. Nominations must include complete biographical information, including academic degrees and honors, pertinent professional and technical training, professional publications, Society activities, and a narrative description of the professional contributions that merit designation as a Fellow.
The Constitution provides that no more than five percent (5%) of the total individual membership reported at the last annual business meeting of the Society shall be elected as Fellows; that at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the members of the Committee on the Selection of Fellows must approve each candidate for a nomination to be approved; and that no member of the Society shall be elected a Fellow who has not been a full member of the Society in good standing for at least seven (7) years immediately preceding election. In approving nominations, the Committee shall be guided by achievement in each of the following criteria:
While serving on this committee standing members may not formally endorse the candidacies of any of the nominations for consideration by the committee, nor participate actively in organizing the submission of an individual nomination. Similarly, when accepting appointment to the committee, Fellows selected to serve by Council should be required to accept as a condition of service that they will not formally endorse the candidacies of any of the nominations for consideration by the committee, nor participate actively in organizing the submission of an individual nomination.
A 75% favorable vote by members of the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows is required for election as a Fellow.
GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS
Nominations should provide all the information necessary for evaluating the nominee. The evaluation should focus on the quality, quantity, and applicability of the nomination to the criteria. The evaluators should not “fill in” evidence that may be missing. This helps ensure that all nominations are evaluated from a common perspective. Evaluators may or may not personally know or be closely familiar with a nominee and their professional career, so in any given year, those who are on the evaluation committee could influence a decision if factors not included in the nomination are part of the assessment.
Focus of the award is for service to the Society of American Archivists. The nomination needs to demonstrate that the individual has made sufficient contributions to the Society to be named an SAA Fellow. This is an award that honors outstanding contributions through active participation in and efforts on behalf of SAA as well as to the broader archival profession. This is not an award for outstanding contributions to the archival profession nationally or in a region or state without demonstrable contributions to SAA as well. While a nominee’s activities in other venues strengthens the evidence in some of the criteria areas, they do not replace evidence of service in SAA. There are individuals who may be “well-known” but have not participated in the functions and activities of SAA. Such individuals may be appropriate for other awards such as the J. Franklin Jameson Archival Advocacy Award or distinguished recognition from the SAA Council.
Nominations should demonstrate the nominee meets all criteria. The nomination should demonstrate both how the nominee meets criteria as well as explaining the strengths and impact of their contributions. The nomination should not simply list those items, but explain in a clear and compelling manner how they are superior or exceptional. Nominees will likely have more contributions in some areas compared to others; the final decision to approve a nomination should be based on the whole of contributions demonstrating a significant overall contribution, while meeting the requirement of contributions in each criterion.
Letters provided should demonstrate the quality of the nominee’s contributions. Letters may come from a range of individuals including professional colleagues, individuals in other professions or communities, and users who have worked with or benefited from the nominee’s efforts. These letters do not need to be from Fellows, Past Presidents, or those who might be perceived as having status in SAA. The purpose is to demonstrate the quality of the nominee’s contributions, not restate how the individual meets the criteria.
Comparability of assessment. In evaluating each nomination, evaluators should strive to ensure that their assessments are consistent and comparable between nominations. An evaluator’s knowledge of an individual’s career, or their particular area of expertise and professional focus, should not lead to a more (or less) favorable assessment.
Recusal. Evaluators should recuse themselves from evaluating a nomination when they have a direct working relationship or other professional or personal relationship that may be perceived as too close for objectivity. This might include an individual’s supervisors, supervisees, partners in current or recent professional positions, or partners/spouses or other close relatives. Recusal by any member of the evaluation committee is not a negative factor for the evaluation, but reflects the intent to ensure fair evaluation for all.
See the SAA Governance Manual Section XI: Fellows for more information.
IV. Reporting Procedures
The committee chair informs the Executive Director of election results as soon as possible so that certificates may be prepared. The chair confidentially informs new Fellows of their election in advance of the Annual Meeting and publicly presents certificates to them at a ceremony at the Annual Meeting. The chair also ensures that nominators of other individuals are informed of the results of their nominations.
V. Meetings
The Committee consults by mail, telephone, and/or in person after nominations have been received so that each nominee's qualifications can be discussed and evaluated. The election of Fellows also may be held by telephone or in person, confirmed in writing, or by mail.
Approved by the SAA Council: February 1990
Revised: January 1992, August 2008, February 2010, March 2020, May 2022.
See also:
I. Purpose
The Diversity Committee works to ensure that the organization's services, activities, policies, communications, and products support the goal of a more diverse SAA and professional archival community. It functions as a catalyst for new diversity-related initiatives, developed in coordination with various SAA entities, and monitors, evaluates, advocates for, and reports on matters pertaining to the diversity of archival practitioners and documentation.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The committee consists of nine members, including the chair and vice chair, who are appointed by the SAA vice president/president-elect. Committee members serve staggered three-year terms. In consultation with the chair, the SAA vice president appoints a vice chair from among committee members with at least one year of experience on the committee. The vice chair serves a one-year term, then accedes to a one-year term as committee chair.
The chairs of the following member affinity groups with interests in diversity issues serve as ex officio members of the committee:
III. Duties and Responsibilities
IV. Reporting Procedures
The Diversity Committee reports to the Council and works closely with its Council liaison, the President, and the Executive Director to ensure that it is responsive to the Council’s needs. The chair is responsible for submitting an annual report to the Council, and may also submit items for Council action or discussion and feedback as necessary. The chair also is responsible for ensuring that minutes of Diversity Committee meetings are prepared and posted on the Diversity Committee’s SAA-hosted website to inform SAA members of its activities and comply with SAA’s record-keeping requirements.
V. Meetings
The committee meets once per year at the Annual Meeting and may also meet mid-year when appropriate. In addition, the committee may conduct its business by e-mail or telephone during the course of the year.
Approved by the SAA Council: 2003
Revised: August 2006, February 2010, May 2014
I. Purpose
The Finance Committee is responsible for assisting the Council in meeting its fiduciary responsibilities by: monitoring the financial health of the organization, ensuring that its assets are protected, and providing advice and counsel to the SAA Treasurer and the Council on financial matters, including the investment program.
II. Size, Composition, Selection, and Length of Terms
The Finance Committee consists of six members: the SAA Treasurer (who serves as chair), the Executive Director, the Finance/Administration Director, and three SAA members appointed by the Vice President in consultation with the current Finance Committee members to determine what expertise is needed as appointments are made. The three appointed members of the Committee serve for staggered three-year terms, so that one individual is appointed by the Vice President each year. The Vice President may appoint a seventh member (as needed or appropriate) an individual who is not an SAA member or archivist, but who has special expertise in one or more aspects of financial management.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Finance Committee reports to each full meeting of the Council, typically via the Treasurer's formal written report, and also reports to the Council on special initiatives as necessary or requested.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Review the Society's financial policies and make recommendations to the Council as appropriate. Review and monitor the Society's income and expenditures, annually review SAA dues and dues revenue to assure SAA's long-term financial stability, and report to the Council on SAA's financial needs and stability. Ensure preparation of accurate, timely, and meaningful financial statements. Meet (via conference call) with the independent auditor annually and review the Annual Audit Report. Review bids, interview, and recommend to the Executive Committee the selection of the external auditor every three years. Review and monitor the Society's investments portfolio and report to the Council on the growth and stability of the investments. Recommend changes to the investment strategy and the Investment Policy as appropriate. Review bids, interview, and recommend to the Executive Committee the selection of one or more investment consultants every three years.
V. Meetings
The Committee meets via conference call 1) after receipt of each quarterly report, in order to discuss the Society's financial standing; 2) prior to submission of a draft annual budget for Council review and adoption, in order to ensure that the draft budget is responsible and reasonable; 3) annually with the external auditor, in order to receive and discuss the Annual Audit Report; and 4) as needed with the investment consultant(s), in order to monitor investment performance.
Approved by the SAA Council: August 2009
Revised: May 2010
I. Purpose
Working closely with the SAA Executive Director and staff, the Host Committee serves as an advisory group to, and onsite extension of, the conference staff. Committee members provide their knowledge of the local area and its history and ideas for the non-program-related arrangements associated with the Annual Meeting.
The conference staff works with Committee members’ suggestions, the SAA Council-adopted budget, and the input of the SAA President and other leaders and staff to explore options and make final decisions and arrangements. Committee members also contribute promotional information (including articles, photographs, and online-only information about the host city) and serve on site as registration personnel.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The SAA Vice President / President-Elect appoints the chair and members of the Host Committee for the meeting over which he/she presides as president. The chair recommends members of the Host Committee from the geographic area in which the Annual Meeting is being held. The chair may wish to designate one or more co- or deputy chairs. The Host Committee is appointed one year or more before the Annual Meeting and serves through that meeting. Members of the Host Committee must be members of SAA, although non-SAA members may be asked to advise or assist the committee.
Host Committees generally establish subcommittees to facilitate their work. The number and responsibilities of these subcommittees is left up to the needs and wishes of each Host Committee.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Host Committee chair submits a report to the SAA Council (at the Annual Meeting or soon thereafter for online consideration) that addresses the extent to which Host Committee activities addressed diversity issues, evaluates the success of the Host Committee work process over the course of the year, and outlines issues encountered or to be addressed by future Host Committees. The Host Committee chair or co-chairs should be available to advise the incoming chair/co-chairs of the next year’s Committee to ensure transfer of knowledge.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Executive Director and conference staff are responsible for:
The Host Committee’s primary duties are the following:
A. Identify, research, and recommend:
B. Help promote the meeting and supply articles, images, and other written materials.
The Host Committee works closely with the SAA Executive Director and staff throughout the year prior to and during the Annual Meeting. Activities led by the Host Committee include but are not limited to:
C. Collect, compile, and use available communication mechanisms (social media, conference website, materials in the registration area) to present local information to potential Annual Meeting registrants. The Host Committee should develop and post actively on an Annual Meeting blog, which should include links to Annual Meeting information tracked and publicized by staff on the SAA website (such as repository tours and session information), as well as the following local information:
D. Coordinate and supply volunteers (both Host Committee members and other volunteers) for staffing of the “Advance Registration” desk during conference hours.
SAA is not able to waive registration fees for Host Committee members or other volunteers.
V. Meetings
The Host Committee meets as many times as is necessary before the Annual Meeting. SAA staff members attend some of these meetings. Meetings may be conducted in the host city, via conference call, or via alternative remote meeting technologies.
Approved by the SAA Council: September 1988
Revised: June 1992, December 2012
I. Purpose
The Membership Committee cooperates with the SAA Executive Director, staff, and the Council to provide advice and counsel on matters of membership recruitment and retention.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
The Membership Committee shall be composed of a chair, a vice chair/chair-elect, and six additional members to serve in staggered three-year terms. The chair of the Diversity Committee serves as an ex officio member. Standing subcommittees shall be appointed by the chair as needed and shall be chaired by a committee member.
The composition of the committee shall represent as broadly as possible all constituencies within the Society. The committee chair submits recommendations of prospective committee members to SAA's vice president/president-elect for consideration, as well as the name of a third-year committee member to serve as its next vice chair. The vice chair will serve a one-year term, followed by a one-year term as chair.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Membership Committee chair and vice chair must submit an annual report to the Council by December 31. The committee works closely with the SAA Executive Director and staff throughout the year as needed.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
The Membership Committee is responsible for the following:
V. Meetings
The Membership Committee meets at least once during the Annual Meeting and at other times, if necessary.
Approved by the SAA Council: January 1988
Revised: June 1992, June 1997, September 2004; December 2009
See also:
Membership Committee website
I. Purpose
The Mosaic Program Advisory Group provides ongoing support for the Association of Research Libraries/Society of American Archivists Mosaic Program, which provides financial support, practical work experience, mentoring, career placement assistance, and leadership development to individuals who are from traditionally underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups. The Mosaic Program work is funded by a three-year, $487,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
II. Task Force Selection, Size, and Length of Term
Following an open call for participation, the SAA Vice President/President-Elect will appoint five SAA members of varying levels of experience within the profession. One of those individuals will serve as the chair of the Advisory Group. Another of those individuals will serve as the chair of the Mosaic Program Selection Committee. All appointments are effective from July 1, 2013, to May 31, 2016
III. Reporting Procedures
The Advisory Group will submit periodic reports to the Project Director on a schedule that ensures that all IMLS grant reporting requirements are fulfilled.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Advisory Group members will contribute their time and perform all functions as extra-professional activities.
The Advisory Group will:
Establish the selection criteria for Mosaic Scholars, within the parameters outlined in the grant application.
Provide input on drafts of calls for applicants, marketing materials, and mentor training materials (e.g., webinars).
Work with the site coordinator from each partner institution to recruit on-site internship supervisors.
Work with the site coordinator from each partner institution to recruit on-site mentors.
In consultation with the SAA Executive Director, the SAA Program Coordinator, and the Project Director, develop the curriculum for the annual Mosaic Program Leadership Symposium to be held in conjunction with the SAA Annual Meeting.
Work with the Project Director and assigned staff to establish a “career placement service” that will, with the cooperation of mentors, develop programs and services to facilitate effective transitions into the professional workforce for all program participants.
Work with the Project Director and Program Coordinator to develop and monitor outcomes-based assessment of the program.
V. Meetings
The Advisory Group will accomplish its work primarily via email, conference call, and/or other electronic means and may meet in conjunction with the SAA Annual Meeting (although funding is not provided for a face-to-face meeting).
I. Purpose
The Mosaic Program Selection Committee is responsible for reviewing applications and selecting each cohort of Mosaic Scholars (five individuals in each of three years).
II. Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Selection Committee comprises five individuals. Following an open call for participation, the SAA Vice President/President-Elect will appoint to the Committee three SAA members of varying levels of experience within the profession. The Association of Research Libraries will appoint two individuals to the Committee. The chair of the Selection Committee will also serve as a member of the Mosaic Program Advisory Group. All appointments are effective from July 1, 2013, through May 31, 2016.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Selection Committee will submit periodic reports to the Mosaic Program Advisory Group and Project Director on a schedule that ensures that applicants receive prompt notification and all grant reporting requirements are fulfilled.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Selection Committee members will contribute their time and perform all functions as extra-professional activities.
The Selection Committee will:
Review the applications received in response to the call for applicants issued for each cohort (2013, 2014, and 2015) based on selection criteria established by the Mosaic Program Advisory Group within the parameters outlined in the grant application.
Provide timely reports of its decisions to ensure that all applicants receive prompt notification.
V. Meetings
The Selection Committee will accomplish its work via email, conference call, and/or other electronic means.
I. Purpose
In accordance with the SAA Bylaws, the Nominating Committee selects a slate of candidates to present for membership vote; provides information about the slate of candidates for the SAA Newsletter; drafts questions for inclusion in the candidates' statements; prepares a final report; and reports the election results at the annual business meeting.
II. Committee Selection, Size, Length of Terms
The Nominating Committee is composed of five members who serve for one year. Three members are elected each year by the membership from a slate submitted by the outgoing Nominating Committee and from any petition and write-in candidates submitted by the membership. Two of the three second-year Council members are selected by lot at the spring meeting of the Council to complete this committee. The vice president/president-elect appoints the chair of the Nominating Committee in the event of a tie for that office, according to the procedures in Bylaw 5.A.
The immediate past chair of the Nominating Committee shall serve on the Committee on the Selection of SAA Fellows for a one-year term.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
The committee selects a slate of two candidates for each of the following offices: vice president/president-elect, three members of Council, and three Nominating Committee members. Two candidates for the office of Treasurer are chosen every third year.
Prior to the Annual Meeting, the chair obtains information from the SAA office and/or the SAA Archives regarding the preferential ballot, previous candidate slates, and election results. The Chair sends this information, along with copies of the Nominating Committee Guidelines and Information Sheets for Nominees to the other committee members. She/he also schedules committee meetings at the Annual Meeting, develops meeting agendas, and assigns responsibilities to committee members (e.g., to prepare lists of possible candidates or to contact various groups for suggestions).
The committee normally meets twice during the Annual Meeting. The first meeting, scheduled early in the week, should result in a slate of candidates for each office, a list of alternates, and a draft of the questions for the candidates' statements. (Because so much of the committee's work is completed during the Annual Meeting, if a Nominating Committee Open House is held, it should be scheduled early, perhaps prior to the first committee meeting, so that it can serve as an effective means for securing additional nominations.) The period between the two meetings of the committee is used by committee members to contact prospective candidates, inform them of the duties/ obligations of running for office, provide them with copies of the Information Sheet for Nominees, and secure commitments from as many of them as possible. The second meeting includes preparation of the final slate, the development of plans for contacting any candidates not yet committed, and approval of questions for candidates. A list of suggestions for nominations to be forwarded to the next year's committee also may be prepared at this meeting.
If alternate candidates must be approached after the Annual Meeting, the committee may reconvene by conference call. The final slate is circulated among the committee members for review, and the chair formally writes all candidates to confirm nomination prior to submitting the slate and list of candidates' questions to the Executive Director. The final slate is to be published in the SAA Newsletter. The SAA office handles the preparation and distribution of the ballot and arranges for the tabulation of election results by the Ballot Committee. The Executive Director informs each of the candidates of the results of the election.
The chair of the committee prepares a final report and submits it to the Council.
The chair reports the election results at the following annual business meeting.
IV. Criteria for Selection of Candidates
All candidates must be Individual members of SAA. Although no other formal criteria are listed for candidates, most committees strive for a balanced slate in terms of gender, geographical area, types and size of candidates repositories, and professional interests. The committee may wish to use past service on the Council as a requirement for selection of vice presidential candidates, and active participation in SAA as a requirement for candidates for the Council.
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1988.
Revised: May 2022.
I. Purpose
The Program Committee selects, oversees, and reports on the education sessions for the Annual Meeting for which it is established. It maintains liaison with the SAA President, appropriate SAA staff, and the Host Committee.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
III. Reporting Procedures
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
In reaching its decisions on these questions, the Program Committee will follow the Council-adopted "Principles and Priorities for Continuously Improving the SAA Annual Meeting" (August 2013) and the recommendations of the 2011-2013 Annual Meeting Task Force in its final report to the Council (May 2013).
Approved by the SAA Council: September 1988
Revised: August 2005, August 2013, November 2023,
I. Purpose
The Student Program Subcommittee reviews and selects graduate student paper proposals and oversees selection and/or judging of student posters for the annual meeting for which it is established. The Student Program Subcommittee is also charged with formulating applicable policy recommendations, as necessary, for the effective management of graduate student paper and poster sessions.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Terms
III. Reporting Procedures
The Student Program Subcommittee reports to the Program Committee chair/co-chairs.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Approved by Council: January 2006
Revised: August 2008, January 2013
I. Purpose
The purpose of the Publications Board and Publications Editor is to ensure that the Society's non-serial publications serve the needs of its members. The Publications Board assists the Publications Editor by establishing overall policy direction, goals, and priorities for the non-serial publications program; approving manuscripts; and monitoring publications to ensure consistently high quality. The Publications Board also assists with the evaluation of the Publications Editor as requested by the Council.
II. Board Size, Length of Terms, and Selection
The Publications Board consists of the Publications Editor, who serves as chair of the board, and eight individual board members.
The Publications Editor's term of office, assuming satisfactory performance, is three years, with an option of reappointment for one additional three-year term.
The eight individual board members are appointed for four-year terms that are staggered so that one-fourth of the members are appointed each year. The Publications Editor recommends new members for appointment by the SAA Vice President. The Vice President bears ultimate responsibility for appointing board members to ensure that they represent diverse knowledge areas and constituencies within SAA. The Publications Editor's recommendations, however, bear considerable weight in this appointment process. An individual may serve no more than two consecutive terms.
The chair of The American Archivist Editorial Board will serve as an ex officio member of the Publications Board.
III. Duties and Responsibilities
A. Publications Editor
The role of the Publications Editor is to set a vision and provide philosophical and strategic direction for the program, acquire manuscripts, maintain a clear and transparent review process, direct the work of the Publications Board, cultivate partnerships with other professional associations, and seek external financial support (with the Council's permission) for specific projects.
The Publications Editor also serves as an ex officio member of The American Archivist Editorial Board.
B. Publications Board
The Publications Board assists the Publications Editor to:
C. SAA Office
The SAA office coordinates the physical production and mechanical aspects of the publishing program, including:
IV. Meetings
The Publications Board typically meets twice each year, once at the Annual Meeting and once at the midpoint of the fiscal year (provided funding is available). The Council liaison, Editor of American Archivist, Executive Director, Director of Publishing, and Production Manager participate in all meetings of the Publications Board.
V. Budget
The SAA Council, as part of its budget process, approves the publications program budget, which is prepared by the SAA office.
VI. Reporting and Performance Evaluation Procedures for Editor
The Publications Editor reports directly to the Council, and is required to submit written reports three times a year to the Council. The Council also may request that the Publications Editor attend and present a verbal report in conjunction with the Annual Meeting.
If the Council expresses concern about the performance of the Publications Editor, it will charge the Executive Director to gather information so that the Council can conduct a more detailed performance review. Such a performance review would include feedback from Publications Board members, the Director of Publishing, authors, and other individuals as appropriate.
In years in which the incumbent Publications Editor is eligible for reappointment, the Executive Director will contact the incumbent Publications Editor to determine if he or she is interested in serving a second term. If the Publications Editor expresses such an interest, the matter will be referred to the Council. After reviewing the Publications Editor's performance based on the position description and consulting such individuals as it deems appropriate, the Council will determine whether it wishes to offer the Publications Editor reappointment to a second term or will direct the Executive Director to implement a search for a new Publications Editor.
Approved by the Council September 29, 2006.
Revised by the Council: June 2012.
I. Purpose
The Standards Committee is responsible for initiating and facilitating the development of standards;* providing review and comment on standards that are relevant to archival theory and practice; educating the archives community about the value and role of standards; maintaining and updating the SAA Standards Portal; and partnering with related information management professional organizations on standards of mutual concern and interest.
* For the purposes of this document, the term "standards" includes standards, technical standards, conventions, rules, guidelines, and best practices. See Standards Development and Review for more information.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The Standards Committee consists of nine appointed members (including two co-chairs) appointed by the SAA vice president / president-elect for staggered three-year terms. The Committee also shall include ex officio members, including chairs of all technical subcommittees and development and review teams that report to the Standards Committee, representatives of other SAA groups whose interests and activities closely interact with those of the Standards Committee, and members who serve as SAA's representatives to external organizations that deal with matters within the Committee's area of concern. Ex officio members shall include:
The SAA vice president / president-elect annually appoints three members based on recommendations from the Standards Committee co-chairs, whose terms begin at the end of the Annual Meeting. The co-chairs are appointed for staggered two-year terms, and are normally appointed based on the recommendation of the co-chairs by the vice president / president-elect from among the current and previous members of the Committee. Following the co-chair's two-year appointment, the co-chair shall become an ex officio member for one year.
Technical subcommittees. The Standards Committee may recommend that the SAA Council form (and disband) technical subcommittees. The SAA Council may charge a technical subcommittee to oversee SAA-developed standards. Technical subcommittees are responsible for the maintenance and review of the assigned standard (which requires that they monitor all feedback and calls for revision of the standard) and for promoting the standard and educating appropriate communities about it. Technical subcommittee chairs serve as regular or ex officio members of the Standards Committee.
With the recommendations of the Standards Committee co-chairs, the SAA vice president / president-elect appoints technical subcommittee chairs and members. Technical subcommittee members must have expertise related to the standard that they are responsible for maintaining. Technical subcommittees are ongoing as long as the adoped standard remains in use. Technical subcommittee chairs serve as regular or ex officio members of the Standards Committee.
Development and review teams. The Standards Committee may recommend that the SAA Council form (and disband) development and review teams to research and develop a specific standard, review a specific standard, study the need for a standard, or address a particular topic. Development and review teams are ad hoc and will be charged for an appropriate period of time as determined by the Council in consultation with the Standards Committee, not to exceed three years, and with the possibility of renewal.
With the recommendations of the Standards Committee co-chairs, the SAA vice president / president-elect appoints development and review team chairs and members. Development and review team members must have expertise related to the topic being addressed, and will most often be from the group that proposed the original project. Development and review team chairs serve as regular or ex officio members of the Standards Committee.
III. Reporting Procedures
The Standards Committee reports to the Council, providing a formal written report annually and reporting on special initiatives as necessary or requested. The co-chairs are responsible for coordinating the formulation and evaluation of the annual report and other planning documents as needed in consultation with Standards Committee members. The chair of each current technical subcommittee and development and review team is responsible for preparing and submitting an annual report of the group's activities to the Standards Committee co-chairs.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill its mission as described above, the Standards Committee is specifically charged to:
VI. Meetings
The Standards Committee meets once per year at the SAA annual meeting. Depending on operational need and contingent on SAA Council funding, the Committee or subgroups of it may meet midyear. Periodic conference call meetings may be scheduled as needed. Although regular meetings are open to any SAA member who wishes to attend, the Committee shall also hold public meetings as needed at the SAA annual meeting to report on the progress of ongoing standards development or to review projects and to receive questions and suggestions.
Approved by the SAA Council: June 1991 (for a period of three years); June 1992, extended to June 1995
Revised: June 1998, February 2010, January 2011, January 2012, August 2013, November 2018.
A primary responsibility of the Standards Committee is to oversee the process of initiating, developing, reviewing, and approving all standards developed by the Society of American Archivists through its subgroups, as well as reviewing standards submitted by external groups to SAA for its endorsement.
The Standards Committee works with groups on standards and standards-related projects from the initiation of the proposal, through development or review, to submission of the standard to the SAA Council for final approval.
For additional information about Standards Committee procedures:
The SAA Standards Committee defines a “standard” to be an industry agreement that establishes qualities or practices that make possible sharing of information, development of common vocabularies and practices, and more effective interaction among archivists, librarians, records managers, information managers, preservation administrators, historians, and other allied professionals. SAA standards must be approved by the SAA Council and they are maintained and periodically reviewed by professionals in the community.
Standards of many types are now central to archival practice. This document will generally use the term “standards” to refer to all of these types, including standards used in automated information systems, in preservation management, and in other technical areas, as well as standards and guidelines relating to professional practice.
Standards can take many forms:
The Standards Committee will not be concerned with the creation and maintenance of thesauri.
The Society of American Archivists recognizes the central importance of consensus to the development of standards. However, consensus on a specific standard may not always equate with unanimous and unqualified approval by all concerned, for in most cases this will be difficult to achieve.
The Standards Committee procedures for standards development within SAA mandate broad review of any proposed standard by all groups, both inside and outside of SAA, that have an interest in the standard. Important features of the review process are:
The Standards Committee is concerned both with the development of new standards and with the process of standards maintenance and review.
The best possible effort will be made to ensure that all reasonable opinions are considered in the development process and that most disputes are resolved before a document is deemed ready for the Council's consideration as an SAA standard.
Final adoption of a document as an SAA standard rests with the Council of the Society of American Archivists.
Once a standard is adopted, an ongoing technical subcommittee of the Standards Committee is assigned maintenance responsibilities to ensure that the document is promulgated widely, monitored in its application, and reviewed (and, if necessary, revised) on a regular schedule.
The Standards Committee has prepared detailed procedures for standards development and review.
SAA also plays an important role as a participant in work undertaken by other organizations that develop technical standards, such as the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and the Association for Information and Image Management (AIIM).
One of SAA’s core values is ensuring the diversity of its membership and leaders, the profession, and the archival record. We expect SAA-endorsed standards to reflect this commitment to a diverse and inclusive profession. Groups working on standards revisions or development are expected to articulate how the standard/revision addresses individual, institutional, or geographic diversity, or supports the development, inclusion, and stewardship of a diverse profession or cultural record.
The Standards Committee is ready to assist any SAA subgroup or outside organization to devise a strategy for developing a new standard or for reviewing and/or revising an existing document so that it can be considered for formal adoption as an SAA standard. Please contact the co-chairs of the Standards Committee for further information. [Member Roster]
Approved by SAA Council: June 1995
Revised: February 2010, January 2012, October 2023, June 2024
¹ The Standards Committee has modified the best practice definition from: A Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology. Retrieved May 26, 2009, from: http://www.archivists.org/glossary/term_details.asp?DefinitionKey=1770
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
SAAStandardsWorkflow_20231012.pdf | 71.38 KB |
Standards Committee_ Standard Creation_Revision_Outline_20231012.docx.pdf | 70.16 KB |
SAA Standards Process Flow Chart.pdf | 29.21 KB |
Standard Creation_Revision_Outline_v3_20240625.pdf | 76.05 KB |
Proposals must be submitted by official groups within the SAA (including committees, technical subcommittees, boards, sections, task forces, and working groups). Individuals interested in the development of a standard may consult with the Standards Committee about groups that are appropriate for submission of a standards proposal.
Complete and submit the Proposal for Standards Development form. The form requires the following information:
I.B.1. Acknowledge receipt of the proposal to the individuals who submitted it and notify the Standards Committee of the proposal submission.
I.B.2. Distribute copies of the proposal to the other members of the Standards Committee, including the subgroup chairs and the SAA Council liaison. Subgroup chairs may distribute the proposal to their technical subcommittee or development and review team for comment.
I.B.3. Collect comments and suggestions from members of the Standards Committee and other subgroups to which the proposal was distributed.
I.B.4. If comments warrant further discussion, arrange for communications to determine if there is a consensus to endorse the proposal.
The Standards Committee will take a formal vote in response to the proposal, and will take one of the following actions in response to a proposal, as appropriate:
The Standards Committee will return to the proposing group a proposal that is incomplete or that requires revision and request that it be revised and resubmitted.
Reasons for returning the proposal may include, but are not limited to:
This process ideally occurs no more than once, but may occur more than once if needed.
The Standards Committee may decline to recommend undertaking a standards project because:
The Standards Committee will forward all declined proposals to the SAA Council along with the reason why the Standards Committee does not recommend the proposal. The proposing group may file an appeal with the SAA Council within 60 days of notification by the Committee.
If the Standards Committee is satisfied with the proposal, it will be submitted with a recommendation by the Committee to the Council for final approval. The Standards Committee will send the Standard Proposal Form and any accompanying correspondence or other documentation to the SAA Council for approval to undertake the project.
For standards already maintained by an existing technical subcommittee or other appointed group, the Standards Committee co-chairs will prepare a draft charge based on the revision proposal and review it with the appointed group’s co-chairs. Upon finalizing that plan, the appointed group shall proceed with its work.
For standards without an existing technical subcommittee or other group, the Standards Committee co-chairs will prepare a draft charge for the development and review team and make recommendations for its membership. In most cases, the members of the proposing group will be included in the recommendation for membership of the development and review team. The charge must then be approved by the SAA Council before the SAA vice president / president-elect appoints the chair(s) and members of the development and review team. Once the standard is adopted, the team will be disbanded by the SAA Council and the Council will either assign the standard to an existing component group or create a technical subcommittee to maintain and review the adopted standard (see V.C.I.).
The Standards Committee co-chairs will notify the co-chairs of the proposing group(s) of the approval of the project. Subsequently, the co-chairs of the group(s) responsible for developing the standard will publish a “Notice of Intention to Initiate a Standards Development Project” via all appropriate SAA communication channels. This step is taken to notify the membership that a project will soon be under way and to solicit comments and participation from interested parties. Any comments will be sent to both the Standards Committee co-chairs and the co-chairs of the proposing group. Official project approval will be granted automatically 30 days after publication of the "Notice" unless the comments received by the Standards Committee co-chairs are such that the proposal warrants reconsideration, in which case the Committee will refer the proposal and comments back to the proposing group for review and response.
In the course of developing a new standard, development and review teams shall complete the following actions:
The development and review team will engage in extensive consultation with interested parties inside and outside of SAA that are essential to the development of standards, and must submit to the Standards Committee evidence that such consultation has taken place. The development and review team must address all written comments sent to the group and all comments made at an SAA open meeting. The Standards Committee will assist the development and review team in publicizing the project and identifying consultants.
Consultation should be pursued through several means, such as:
Once it has completed the consultation process and prepared the final draft of the standard, the development and review team will compile a package to forward to the Standards Committee for its review. This package will include:
III.B.1. Full text of the proposed standard.
III.B.2. Introductory narrative.
This section, which should not exceed 1,000 words, must include the scope of application, in particular:
The development and review team must submit documentation that the consultation process has taken place and that a reasonable agreement has been reached on the contents and intent of the proposed standard. This evidence may take the form of:
The development and review team must recommend a plan for maintenance and review of the standard it has developed. Standards developed by SAA will be assigned to a component group, such as a technical subcommittee, for necessary maintenance and review. Each will be either assigned to a review cycle of no more than 5 years, or approved for ongoing review. At the end of a set review cycle, the SAA Council will be asked by the Standards Committee to reaffirm, revise, or rescind the standard. The "Maintenance and Review Plan" will suggest the appropriate subgroup for assignment and type of review process. (See V.C. - V.E.)
The package should be prepared in and sent to the Standards Committee in PDF format attached to an email to the co-chairs, or by another method deemed acceptable by all parties.
In the event that the development and review team fails to reach general agreement on a draft standard or, for whatever reason, chooses to discontinue its work on the proposed standard, it shall notify the Standards Committee that it has abandoned the project. The Standards Committee shall publish a notice in appropriate SAA media that the project has been discontinued.
Upon receiving the final draft package from the development and review team, the Standards Committee will take the following actions:
The Standards Committee will review the package to ensure that it is complete and that adequate consultation and review have taken place. It may return the package to the development and review team if significant elements (as enumerated in III.B) are missing for revisions. Reasons for returning the package may include, but are not limited to:
This process ideally occurs no more than once, but may occur more than once if needed.
IV.B.1. Publication of revised draft standard.
Based on the substance of the revisions, the potential breadth of impact, and any apparent remaining substantive conflicts on content, the Standards Committee may determine that the entire revised text should be published via an appropriate medium in order to ensure the broadest possible participation in and awareness of the standards development process. The Standards Committee will accept written comments on the revised draft addressed to the Standards Committee co-chairs within 30 days of publication of the revised draft or notice of the availability of the revised draft.
If additional comments received after publication of the revision indicate widespread disagreement about the revised draft within the SAA membership, the Committee may determine that the draft should be referred back to the development and review team for response. Substantive changes to the draft standard as a result of these additional comments may require publication of a new "Notice of Completion" and notification or publication of a new revised draft.
The Standards Committee may determine that issues raised in the additional comments were already addressed adequately during the development and consultation process. The Standards Committee will then publish the notice of completion and forward the package to the SAA Council.
IV B.2. Notice of project completion.
When the final draft package is deemed complete, the Standards Committee will work with SAA staff to publish a notice in the appropriate SAA communication channels announcing that the standards development project has been completed and the draft standard has been forwarded to the Council. (See IV.C.)
At the conclusion of the development process, the Standards Committee will send to the SAA Council a report on the process and a recommendation.
IV.C.1. Recommendation to consider adoption.
When the Standards Committee is satisfied that the development and consultation process has been completed satisfactorily it will, after publication of the notice, forward the package to the SAA Council with a recommendation that the Council consider adopting the draft document as an official standard of the Society of American Archivists.
IV.C.2. Report on "irreconcilable differences."
After reviewing all documentation, the Standards Committee may determine that disagreements raised represent substantive irreconcilable differences of views or professional positions. In this situation, the Standards Committee will forward the package to the SAA Council with an explanation of the remaining problems and, depending on the type of standard and breadth of impact, may or may not recommend that the Council consider adopting the draft as an official standard of the Society of American Archivists.
The Standards Committee shall ensure that the following actions are taken for each standard that is formally adopted by the SAA Council. Often the group that developed the standard will be actively involved in or have primary responsibility for these activities.
V.A.1. Full text in the SAA newsletter.
The preferred method of publication will be to publish the full text of the adopted standard in the Society’s newsletter and on the SAA website.
V.A.2. Notice of availability in newsletter.
Some standards may be too long to publish in the newsletter. For these, a notice of their approval and a summary of their contents will be published in the next SAA newsletter and/or on the SAA website, along with information about how to obtain a copy from the SAA website.
V.A.3. Added to Standards Portal webpage.
SAA staff will post all formally adopted standards on the Standards Portal webpage with the following information: 1) the name of the standard, 2) a description of the standard, 3) a link to the full text of the standard or a description of where the standard can be obtained, 4) the date on which the standard was adopted, 5) next review date of the standard, 6) information about how comments and feedback for revision can be submitted, and 7) any additional supporting documents or information.
V.B.1. Notice to heads of allied professional organizations.
The SAA president and/or executive director will send a letter and copy of the adopted standard to all interested outside organizations to notify them of SAA's action. The Standards Committee will assist the group that developed the standard in drafting the letter and identifying which groups to contact.
V.B.2. Press release to editors of professional journals and newsletters.
The executive director will, in cooperation with the Standards Committee and development and review team, ensure that a press release is distributed to editors of allied professional journals and newsletters to announce the development and approval of the standard, providing its full text when possible.
V.B.3. Other publicity.
For standards of interest beyond professional circles, the executive director, Standards Committee, and development and review team will determine how best to publicize their approval. Working in concert with the Program and Education committees and the SAA staff, the Standards Committee will assist the subgroup in developing workshops, conference sessions, or public forums on the new standard.
Immediately upon adoption of an SAA standard, the following actions shall occur:
V.C.1. Component group responsible for maintenance and review assigned.
As part of the approval process, the SAA Council will assign the standard to an ongoing SAA component group for maintenance and review or create a technical subcommittee. If a new technical subcommittee is to be created, the Standards Committee co-chairs will prepare a draft charge for the subcommittee and make recommendations for its membership. In most cases, the members of the development and review team who were actively involved in the development of the standards will be included in the recommendation for membership of the technical subcommittee. The charge must then be approved by the SAA Council before the vice president / president-elect appoints the chair(s) and members of the subcommittee.
V.C.2. Review cycle set.
All adopted SAA standards will be either assigned a review cycle of no more than five years, with a formal review commencing no later than three years following adoption or reaffirmation (section V.D.), or approved for ongoing review (section V.E.). However, in both situations, comments and revisions to the standard and proposals to revise adopted standards may be submitted at any time. At the end of an assigned review cycle, the SAA Council will be asked to reaffirm, agree to revise, or rescind the standard.
V.C.3. Monitoring and promulgating use begins.
The maintaining component group will be responsible for promoting the proper and effective use of the standard and will regularly obtain comments and feedback on the standard for future review and revision.
At least two years before the review cycle expires, the Standards Committee will notify the maintaining component group that it should initiate a formal review of the content and use of the standard. The following actions shall be taken:
V.D.1. Review plan prepared.
In consultation with the Standards Committee, the component group will prepare a plan that will ensure consensus using the same kinds of broadly based consultation and review that occurred when the standard was originally developed. The plan may include:
V.D.2. Standards Committee and SAA Council review plan.
The component group will submit the plan to the Standards Committee, at which point the Standards Committee will decide whether the review process is adequate. If significant financial resources are required for review, the Standards Committee will forward the plan to the SAA Council with a recommendation for funding.
V.D.3. Recommendation to revise, reaffirm, or rescind the standard.
Once the review plan has been approved, the technical subcommittee will commence the formal review. When adequate consultation has taken place, the technical subcommittee will recommend one of the following:
Once the review plan has been approved, the component group will commence the formal review. When adequate consultation has taken place, the technical subcommittee will recommend one of the following:
V.D.4. Recommendation to the SAA Council
The maintaining component group will submit a package to the Standards Committee containing its recommendation to reaffirm, revise, or rescind the standard along with documentation about the review process (as in III.). If the component group recommends revision, the group will also submit a completed proposal form (as in I.A.2.).
V.D.5. The Standards Committee will review the package to ensure that the review plan was adequate. Assuming that no procedural questions remain unresolved, it will forward the package to the Council with the recommendation to reaffirm, revise, or rescind.
V.D.6. The SAA Council votes on whether to reaffirm, revise, or rescind the standard.
If the Council votes to revise the standard, the component group will continue the revision work. Once the revision has been completed, the component group will follow the same process for submission and approval of a new standard, as outlined in sections III.B. and later.
If the Council reaffirms the standard, a new review cycle will be set, which may be shorter than five years. A new component group may be appointed, if necessary. The component group and the Standards Committee will inform all relevant parties that the standard has been reaffirmed and does not require revision at this time.
Should the Council vote to rescind the standard, the component group and the Standards Committee will inform all relevant parties that the standard has been rescinded. The Standards Committee will then either remove the standard from the standards webpage or mark the standard as "rescinded."
V.D.7. Notice and publication of reaffirmed, revised, or rescinded standards.
An information dissemination process similar to that outlined under V.A. and V.B. for new standards will be followed to ensure broad awareness of SAA actions concerning reaffirmed, revised, and rescinded standards.
Proposed revisions to a standard approved for ongoing review are reviewed and addressed as they are received by the assigned component group. Ongoing review is particularly conducive to standards that are electronically published and thus easy to update. Major or minor proposed changes can be submitted at any time.
In order to respond adequately and in a timely manner to proposals for change, the following actions should be taken:
V.E.1. Proposal for changes received.
Proposals may be submitted by SAA component groups (i.e., sections, committees, task forces, or working groups), by interested external organizations (e.g., the Rare Books and Manuscripts Section), or by individuals, or may be generated by the technical subcommittee itself. Proposals should include the following elements:
All proposals should be submitted to the component group responsible for the maintenance of the standard.
V.E.2. Component group reviews proposals.
Upon receiving a proposal, the component group responsible shall:
Conduct a preliminary review of the proposed change request to ensure that it is complete. Incomplete proposals will be returned to the submitting body. If there are no missing elements to the documentation, the component group will acknowledge receipt to the proposer.
Evaluate if the proposed change should be considered a major or minor change.[1]
[1] These definitions were inspired by Semantic Versioning, but do not completely align with the versioning guidelines put forth by it.
[2] In this context, a major change is a single significant change to the standard. This is distinct from a major revision, which is a revision to the standard as a whole or several major changes. Major revision requires utilizing the cyclical revision procedures (see V.E.7 for major revisions to continuous revision standards).
V.E.3. Consultation with other SAA subgroups and external organizations.
For proposals classified as major changes, external groups, particularly those directly impacted by a proposal, must be consulted during the review process. This should include informing the Standards Committee co-chairs of the proposal submission. Consultation should be pursued through several means, which may include:
For proposals classified as minor changes, consultation with external groups is optional.
V.E.4. Recommendation to revise the standard.
Based on comments received from the community, the component group may either reject the proposal, or develop a recommendation for changes to the standard. The draft changes may be based on both the original proposal and amendments developed during the review process. Change proposals should document changes in the standard in relation to the current text. Significant changes in the initial proposal by the component group may require an additional period of consultation. The review and consultation process should be completed within six months of the submission of a proposal.
For major changes, once the draft changes have been finalized, the proposal packet should be forwarded to the Standards Committee together with documentation of the submission and consultation process. For minor changes, complete and submit to the Standards Committee the Minor Changes Form.
V.E.5. Standards Committee review of recommended changes.
For proposals submitted as major changes, the Standards Committee will review the package to ensure that it is complete and that adequate consultation and review have taken place. It may return the package to the component group if significant elements are missing.
For proposals submitted as minor changes, the Standards Committee will review the package to ensure it is complete and meets the qualifications for a minor change. It may return the package to the component group if significant elements are missing or if it identifies the change as constituting a major change, in which case the component group must follow procedures for revising a major change.
The SAA Council authorizes the Standards Committee to accept minor changes to official standards of the Society of American Archivists. Decisions must be reported in a timely manner to the SAA Council, which reserves the right to roll back the change.
V.E.6. Recommendation to the SAA Council.
For proposed major changes, the Standards Committee will send to the SAA Council a report on the process and a recommendation. This may be either a recommendation to consider implementation of the draft changes, or a recommendation against adoption. The decision to accept changes to official standards of the Society of American Archivists can only be made by the SAA Council.
When the draft changes documentation is deemed complete, the Standards Committee will publish a notice in the appropriate SAA media announcing that the draft changes have been forwarded to the Council.
V.E.6. Promulgation of revised standard.
If a major draft change is accepted by the SAA Council, or a minor change is accepted by the Standards Committee, the Standards Committee will publish a notice of the approval of the changes in the appropriate SAA media.
V.E.7. Major revisions or rescinding the standard.
In addition to managing proposals for revision, the component group may also determine that the standard is no longer relevant or has been superseded, and may recommend that the standard be considered for major revisions or rescinded. The guidelines for cyclical review should be followed in developing such recommendations (see section V.D.). The SAA Council may also establish a deadline for reviewing the applicability and maintenance of standards at their discretion.
In some cases the SAA Council may initiate, or encourage/approve a component group to initiate, the standards development process for best practices documents without seeking prior approval from the Standards Committee. In these cases a subgroup of the Council functions as the standard development and review team and the standards approval process begins at step III as described above.
SAA Expert Groups (as identified by the Council) may also create best practice and/or guidelines that support the mission of the Society and its members. In these cases the Expert Group functions as the standards development and review team and the standards approval process begins at Step III. The Expert Group will notify the Standards Committee co-chairs when they begin a revision process.
Revised June 1995, February 2010, January 2012, August 2013, May 2014, July 2016, January 2021, June 2024.
This outline is designed to help Society of American Archivists (SAA) sections or groups who are sponsoring the creation of a new standard or the revision of an existing standard. This is not a substitute for the Procedures for Review and Approval of an SAA-Developed Standard, but it is designed to help navigate the process. References to the Procedures are included throughout the list, for more detailed information with the section and subsection number (ex: I.A. or III.C.1)
Please note: This outline is not for the Procedures for SAA Endorsement of an External Standard. That is a different (and slightly shorter) process designed for SAA approval of standards created or revised by external groups, task forces with representation from multiple organizations, or other non-SAA developed documentation.
1. The proposing group(s) (which must be an official SAA group) must complete the proposal for standards development (I.A.)
a. Note: Occasionally, creation or revision may begin with a different workflow, under the auspices of SAA Council. “Fast-tracked procedures” (VI) may be initiated by Council, but are still subject to review by Standards Committee, beginning with Section III of the Procedures and should follow the outline below starting at step 3.
2. Standards Committee reviews the proposal and may be in communication with the proposing group(s) for additional details (II.A)
3. Standards Committee recommends for Council to approve creation/revision process and forwards it to Council according to their meeting schedule/deadline for agenda items.
4. Once Council has agreed that a proposal is approved for creation/revision, the Standards Development Process (III) begins. The group appointed to do the creation/revision will:
a. Consult with SAA groups and external organizations (III.A). This process should be documented for the submission packet later.
b. Draft the new or revised standard and supporting documentation (III.B) OR submit a notice of project abandonment (III.C).
c. Submit the packet (draft and supporting documentation) to Standards.
5. Standards Committee reviews the submission packet and may be in communication with the group leading the creation/revision for additional details or information (IV.A).
6. Once the packet is complete, Standards Committee will make a recommendation and forward it to Council according to their meeting schedule/deadline for agenda items.
7. Once the packet has been recommended to Council for approval of the creation/revision and Council has agreed, the group leading the creation/revision:
a. Will work with the Standards Committee and SAA Webmaster to add or update the standard on the Standards Portal (V.A.3).
b. Will assist in developing information to release through different channels to share the new or revised standard (V.B)
c. May participate in managing the revision cycle or ongoing maintenance (depending on how the standard is managed) (V.C.2). Details on cyclical review (V.D) and on-going review (V.E.) are part of the procedures.
8. Celebrate your success!
Continuous Revision Note
Some standards are on a continuous revision cycle and major and minor changes may be proposed at any time without a full revision proposal.
1. Technical subcommittees responsible for standards under continuous revision may submit a minor change to the Standards Committee as per Section V.E.2 using the minor change request form. Minor changes are approved by the Standards Committee and submitted to Council for notification at the end of each year, as part of the annual report.
2. The technical subcommittees responsible for standards under continuous revision may submit a major change to one or more parts of the standard following the guidance in Section V.D.
V.2 reviewed and approved by the Standards Committee, October 2023
Proposals must be submitted by official groups within the SAA. Individuals who are interested in submitting a proposal for the endorsement of an external standard may consult with the Standards Committee on appropriate groups to which they may wish to submit a proposal.
I.A. The proposing group shall:
Complete and submit the PROPOSAL FOR ENDORSEMENT OF AN EXTERNAL STANDARD form. The form shall include:
I.B. The Standards Committee co-chairs shall:
I.B.1. Acknowledge receipt of the ENDORSEMENT PROPOSAL FORM to the proposing body and notify the Standards Committee of the proposal submission.
I.B.2. Distribute copies of the ENDORSEMENT PROPOSAL FORM to the other members of the Standards Committee, including the subgroup chairs and the SAA Council liaison. Subgroup chairs may distribute the proposal to their technical subcommittee or development and review team for comment.
I.B.3. Collect comments and suggestions from members of the Standards Committee and other subgroups to which the proposal was distributed.
I.B.4. If comments warrant further discussion, arrange for a discussion to determine whether there is a consensus to endorse the standard.
The Standards Committee will take a formal vote in response to the proposal, and will take one of the following actions in response to a proposal, as appropriate:
II.A. Return for revision.
The Standards Committee will return to the submitting group a proposal form that is incomplete or that requires revision and request that it be revised and resubmitted.
II.B. Decline.
The Standards Committee may decline the endorsement of an external standard because: 1) the external standard is in direct conflict with an SAA-adopted standard or policy; 2) there is insufficient demand or potential benefit to SAA members; 3) the standard is not widely adopted or used in the archives field; or 4) the review process does not allow for SAA contribution or comment.
II.C. Endorse.
If the Standards Committee agrees that the external standard has benefit to the SAA community, it will recommend the standard to the SAA Council for endorsement. If the SAA Council endorses the standard, the Standards Committee will then take the following actions:
Adopted by the SAA Council: February 2010, January 2012
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee on Archival Facilities Guidelines (TS-AFG) of the SAA Standards Committee oversees the ongoing maintenance and development of Archives and Special Collections Facilities: Guidelines for Archivists, Librarians, Architects, and Engineers (“Facilities standard”), a standard adopted by SAA. The Technical Subcommittee also investigates the feasibility of expansion of the Facilities standard to a national standard and/or a multi-organizational standard.
II. Subcommittee Selection, Size, and Length of Term:
TS-AFG shall be charged for five years, beginning August 2010, or until revisions to the Facilities standard are completed as described in the Procedures for Review and Approval of an SAA-Developed Standard. [TS-AFG's original length of term was extended to August 2016 by the SAA Executive Committee on July 27, 2015. The term was further extended to August 2018 by the SAA Council in November 2016. The term was further extended to August 2020 by the SAA Council in February 2019. The term was further extended to August 2022 by the SAA Council in November 2020. The term was extended to July 2024 by the SAA Council in November 2023. The term was extended to July 2025] After revision work is completed, if the Facilities standard continues to be an approved standard of SAA, the TS-AFG shall be re-charged for a subsequent review cycle.
The members and chair(s) of the TS-AFG shall be appointed for the length of time necessary to complete revisions to the Facilities standard, which shall not exceed five years.
The Technical Subcommittee shall be composed of five to nine individuals, including the chair(s), to be recommended by the Standards Committee for appointment by the Vice President. The chair(s) and at least four other member of the Subcommittee shall be a member of SAA with demonstrated experience in archival facility issues. However, the Technical Subcommittee may include one to three members from other professions who have significant knowledge of and experience with archival facilities.
Ex officio members of the TS-AFG shall include the following:
III. Reporting Procedures:
The chair(s) of the TS-AFG shall report at least annually to the chair(s) of the SAA Standards Committee at the SAA Annual Meeting. If extramural funding is obtained by the SAA, the chair(s) shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that reporting requirements of SAA and funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities:
To fulfill its mission as described above, the TS-AFG is specifically charged to:
V. Meetings:
The TS-AFG shall carry out its charges primarily via electronic mail, regular mail, and conference calls. It may meet at the SAA Annual Meeting and as necessary provided that SAA Council-approved funding is available.
Revised by the SAA Council: January 2011; December 2013; July 2015; November 2016; February 2019; November 2020; November 2023; October 2024.
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee for Describing Archives: A Content Standard (TS-DACS) of the SAA Standards Committee is responsible for overseeing the timely and ongoing intellectual and technical maintenance and development of Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS). DACS is an output-neutral set of rules for describing archives, personal papers, and manuscript collections, and can be applied to all material types. DACS is compatible with ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description, 2nd ed. (International Council on Archives, 1999) and ISAAR(CPF): International Standard Archival Authority Records for Corporate Bodies, Persons and Families, 2nd ed. (International Council on Archives, 2003). DACS is an SAA-approved standard; documentation for DACS is available through the Society of American Archivists at http://www.archivists.org/governance/standards/dacs.asp .
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The technical subcommittee shall be composed of ten regular members and two co-chairs. All members shall be appointed by the SAA Vice President/President-Elect for staggered three-year terms so that a minimum of two individuals are appointed by the Vice President each year. All members must demonstrate significant knowledge of and experience with archival description generally, and with DACS specifically.
All members of TS-DACS shall be recommended by the Standards Committee for appointment by the SAA Vice President. The chair(s) will be selected from existing TSDACS membership and appointed for a three year term. The chair(s) and members of TS-DACS may be reappointed for one consecutive term.
Ex officio members of the Technical Subcommittee on DACS shall include the following if they are not regular members of the subcommittee:
III. Reporting Procedures
The chair(s) of the Technical Subcommittee on DACS shall report at least annually to the chair(s) of the SAA Standards Committee on the occasion of the SAA Annual Meeting. If extramural funding is obtained by SAA, the chair(s) shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that the reporting requirements of SAA and the funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill this mission, TS-DACS is specifically charged to:
TS-DACS shall work within the guidelines for ongoing review of an SAA-adopted standard, and may develop more detailed procedures for meeting those requirements.
VI. Meetings
TS-DACS shall carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, regular mail, and conference calls. It shall meet at the SAA Annual Meeting and as necessary, provided that SAA Council-approved funding is available.
Approved by the SAA Council: February 2010
Revised: January 2011; August 2013; February 2017; March 2024;
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee for Encoded Archival Standards (TS-EAS) is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of EAD and EAC-CPF, including all schemas and related code, as well as the development of future companion standards, such as the proposed Encoded Archival Context for Functions. Its membership will be sufficient to encompass the necessary domain expertise for each standard and schema development, and will include broad international representation including SAA members and other professionals from the international archival community. The members of the committee will foster the thoughtful evolution of archival encoding standards on behalf of and in consultation with the global archival community and in close collaboration with the International Council on Archives Experts Group on Archival Description.
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The technical subcommittee shall be composed of between fifteen and twenty-five members (excluding two co-chairs) appointed by the SAA Vice President / President-Elect for staggered three-year terms so that a minimum of three individuals are appointed by the Vice President each year. The committee will reflect the international nature of the standards it develops, and will include balanced representation from its user communities. A majority of the committee members will be members of SAA unless sufficient expertise is not available within the SAA membership, in which case the composition of the committee may be adjusted at the discretion of the Council. All members shall demonstrate significant knowledge of and experience with archival schemas generally, and with EAD and EAC-CPF specifically. The chairs and members of TS-EAS may be reappointed.
The Technical Subcommittee for Encoded Archival Standards co-chairs will be appointed by the SAA Vice President / President-Elect, and serve as the primary contact between TS-EAS, SAA, the Standards Committee, and other related organizations. At least one co-chair will be a member of SAA.
Ex officio members of TS-EAS shall include the following if they are not regular members of the subcommittee:
III. Reporting Procedures
The co-chairs of TS-EAS shall report at least annually to the chairs of the SAA Standards Committee. They will coordinate meeting logistics at the SAA annual meeting and elsewhere, establish TS-EAS priorities and agendas, work with related SAA section leaders, and oversee and support the work of various TS-EAS standard leads. If extramural funding is obtained by SAA, the co-chairs shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that the reporting requirements of SAA and the funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
Within TS-EAS, a member will be designated by the co-chairs as the lead for each standard being maintained or developed. Each standard lead will be responsible, with the support of the co-chairs, for soliciting and compiling comments, logging bugs, leading discussion of proposed changes, articulating and justifying changes to the international community, and coordinating as necessary with other standard leads. There will also be a lead for schema design who will be responsible, with the support of the co-chairs, for coordinating work on schemas and related code and maintaining appropriate GitHub repositories. The TS-EAS co-chairs will also designate a committee member to serve as a secretary, responsible for taking and distributing meeting minutes.
Additional ad hoc subgroups within TS-EAS may be formed to address specific issues on a project basis (e.g., a tag library editorial team).
VI. Meetings
TS-EAS shall carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, regular mail, and on-line meetings. To ensure the inclusion of all members, TS-EAS shall meet in a hybrid setting at the SAA annual meeting and as necessary with funding from SAA or from extramural sources (with prior approval by the SAA Council).
Approved by the SAA Council: November 2015, Revised May 2023
I. Purpose
The Technical Subcommittee on Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning (TS-GRD) of the SAA Standards Committee is responsible for overseeing the timely and ongoing maintenance, review, promotion, outreach, and education-related to the and development of Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning. These guidelines provide resources, recommended procedures, and other information for archivists who may be involved in reviewing their institutional holdings. Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning is an SAA-approved standard and is available via the SAA Standards Portal (http://www2.archivists.org/standards/).
II. Committee Selection, Size, and Length of Term
The TS-GRD was charged for five years, beginning August 2012, to develop the standard, with the charge expiring at the SAA Annual Meeting of the fifth year. The Guidelines continue to be an approved standard of SAA. In May 2017, the Council extended the technical subcommittee for another 5-year review cycle, to be completed by August 2022. In 2022, the Council approved an extension of the second review cycle to August 2025.
The technical subcommittee shall be composed of five to eight individuals, including the Chair and Vice-chair, to be recommended by the Standards Committee for appointment by the Vice President. The Chair of the second review cycle will serve until August 2023. A Vice Chair will be appointed for a three-year term beginning August 2022: the first year as Vice Chair, and the second and third years as Chair. All members shall demonstrate significant knowledge of and experience with archival appraisal, reappraisal, reprocessing, and/or deaccessioning. Members and chairs may be reappointed to the TS-GRD for two consecutive review cycles, but at least two new SAA members must be appointed per review cycle.
Ex officio members of the Technical Subcommittee for Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning shall include the following if they are not regular members of the Subcommittee:
III. Reporting Procedures
The chair(s) of the TS-GRD shall report at least annually to the chair(s) of the SAA Standards Committee on the occasion of the SAA Annual Meeting. If extramural funding is obtained by SAA, the chair (or co-chairs) shall provide all necessary narrative reports to the SAA office in order that the reporting requirements of SAA and the funding source are met.
IV. Duties and Responsibilities
To fulfill this mission, the TS-GRD is specifically charged to:
VI. Meetings
The TS-GRD shall carry out its charge primarily via electronic mail, and conference calls. It shall meet at the SAA Annual Meeting and as necessary with funding from SAA or from extramural sources (with prior approval by the SAA Council.
Adopted by the SAA Council: May 23, 2012. Revised: May 2017. June 2023.